SUMMARY BackgroundControversy exists regarding glucocorticoids therapy and the risk of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB).

The major issue in selecting patients for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) lies in determining the optimal number of TACE sessions that may benefit patients before switching to other therapies. This is often a subjective decision not based on any standardized protocol. The ART (Assessment for Retreatment with Transarterial chemoembolization) score was recently developed to determine patients who may benefit from multiple sessions of TACE for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. The primary aim of the study was to validate the ART score in a Taiwanese cohort. The secondary aims were to evaluate overall survival and clinical determinants of improved survival in patients treated with multiple TACE sessions. The ART score, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of 82 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who received multiple TACE sessions at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from September 2007 to July 2013 were analyzed. Among the 82 patients evaluated, 69.5% (n = 57) had an ART score of 0 to 1.5 and 34.1% (n = 25) had a score of ≥2.5. The median overall survival was 23.1 months and the overall mortality rate was 62.2% (n = 51). The ART score was not associated with survival (P = 0.58). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor size >7.2 cm (hazard ratio 4.44, P < 0.001), aspartate transaminase (AST) level above 95 IU/L (hazard ratio 2.18, P = 0.02), AST increase more than 25% (hazard ratio 2.13, P = 0.02), 2nd/1st (pre-TACE) alpha-fetoprotein ratio (hazard ratio 1.40, P = 0.001), and lack of radiological response to TACE (hazard ratio 2.21, P = 0.02) were independent clinical determinants of survival. The ART score was not found to be effective in selecting patients for TACE retreatment in our Taiwanese cohort. Large tumor size, high AST level, high 2nd/1st (pre-TACE) alpha-fetoprotein ratio, AST increase >25%, and lack of radiological response to TACE were independently associated with shorter survival after TACE therapy.

Rationale, aims and objectives Baseline thyroid function testing and regular follow-up of thyroid function under amiodarone usage was recommended by guidelines. Little is known about the status of amiodarone monitoring in real-world clinical care in Taiwan. The objective was to determine the rate of thyroid monitoring and to assess the clinical and physicians' characteristics associated with adequate monitoring in a tertiary referral centre for arrhythmia. Methods We reviewed the medical records of patients receiving amiodarone during the period 2008-2009 at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. The rate of baseline and follow-up thyroid function monitoring during amiodarone therapy were calculated. Factors associated with guideline adherence to monitoring were analysed. Results Among the 1319 enrolled cases, 36.4% (n = 480) underwent baseline thyroid function testing and 1.1% (n = 15) received measurement of anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody before amiodarone initiation. Regular follow up of thyroid function under amiodarone usage occurred in only 8.6% (n = 114) of cases. Baseline thyroid function was more likely to be present in patients of younger age (P < 0.001), female sex (P = 0.01), and in those who received amiodarone therapy from cardiologists (P < 0.001) or electrophysiologists (P < 0.001) with fewer years of service (P < 0.001). Upon multivariate analysis, only physicians' expertise (cardiologist versus non-cardiologist, OR = 5.67, 95% CI: 2.44-13.16) and years of service (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-0.998) were significantly associated with adequate thyroid monitoring. Conclusions The rate of thyroid monitoring with amiodarone therapy had been suboptimal. Strategies to enhance guideline adherence are needed.