Hospital Authority Research Ethics Committee Clinical Trial Registry (HARECCTR0500018; Hong Kong) and US ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00371319).

No abstract

The aim of this study is to report the long-term outcome of pure membranous lupus nephropathy (MLN) treated with glucocorticoid and azathioprine (AZA). A cohort of patients with SLE who had biopsy-confirmed pure MLN was treated initially with prednisone (0.8-1.0 mg/kg/day) and AZA (targeted to 2 mg/kg/day). Patients were followed for the following outcomes: remission rate at 12 months, renal flares, extra-renal flares and renal function deterioration. The cumulative risks of renal flares and renal function decline were studied by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Thirty-eight patients were studied (31 women; age 35.0 +/- 9.2 years; mean SLE duration 48.5 +/- 59 months; WHO Class Va 45%, Vb 55%). Twenty-two (58%) patients were nephrotic and four (11%) were hypertensive at presentation. All patients were treated with prednisolone (0.85 +/- 0.24 mg/kg/day) and AZA (1.72 +/- 0.43 mg/kg/day). At 12 months, 24 (67%) patients achieved complete response (CR), 8 (22%) had partial response (PR) and 4 (11%) were treatment resistant. After a follow-up of 12 +/- 5.8 years, 19 episodes of renal flares (15 proteinuric and 4 nephritic) occurred in 13 (34%) patients. The cumulative risks of renal flares at 5, 10 and 15 years were 19.4, 32.0 and 36.8%, respectively. Retreatment with an augmented dosage of prednisolone, +/- another immunosuppressive agent, resulted in CR and PR in 15 (79%) and 4 (21%) of these flare episodes, respectively. At last visit, three (8%) patients had doubling of serum creatinine, whereas six (16%) patients had decline of creatinine clearance by >/=30% (none developed end stage renal failure). Seven episodes of thromboembolic complications occurred in five (13%) patients and 11 episodes of infective complications (five major, six minor) were reported in seven (18%) patients. In the absence of co-existing proliferative lesions, MLN runs a relatively benign course with low risk of renal function deterioration. Treatment with high-dose prednisolone and AZA is effective, inexpensive and well-tolerated. Prolonged observation shows that one of three patients develop renal flares, which are often proteinuric and responsive to reinduction therapy.

A significant proportion of PsA patients had asymptomatic hyperuricemia. It was closely related with BMI, which represented metabolic dysregulation; but not with severity of skin disease, joint involvement or renal function.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a multisystem disease that affects the joints and various organs, resulting in compromised quality of life and increased mortality. A wide spectrum of treatment options is available for RA. Conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) are the first-line of treatment for RA, whereas tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors are commonly used as a second-line biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug following inadequate response to csDMARDs. However, remission remains difficult to achieve. No single agent is effective for all patients. It is important to consider patients' comorbidities, perspectives, and preferences when selecting treatment. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) plays a prominent role in the pathophysiology of RA and is an important therapeutic target for RA. Tocilizumab and sarilumab are approved IL-6 inhibitors, which have demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability as combination therapy or monotherapy in RA patients with inadequate response to csDMARDs or tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors. Apart from alleviating joint symptoms, inducing remission, and reducing structural damage, tocilizumab and sarilumab exhibit additional advantages in alleviating extra-articular symptoms, such as fatigue and morning stiffness, and have positive effect on anemia and glucose metabolism. Additionally, evidence showed that certain patient subgroups, such as those with comorbidities including anemia and diabetes mellitus, those with early RA, those with high baseline IL-6 levels, those at high risk of tuberculosis infection, or those intolerant to methotrexate monotherapy, may benefit from IL-6 inhibition. Given these advantages, tocilizumab and sarilumab can be considered earlier as a rational choice for treating RA in suitable patients. Future clinical investigations will help refine the use of these agents.