Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4-1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks and 5-6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3-4.8), 3.9 (2.6-5.1) and 3.6 (2.0-5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9-2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2-8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6-2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.

Non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is present at liver transplantation in 5% to 26% of cirrhotic patients, and the prevalence of complex PVT as defined here (grade 4 Yerdel, and grade 3,4 Jamieson and Charco) has been reported in 0% to 2.2%. Adequate portal inflow is mandatory to ensure graft and patient survival after liver transplantation. With time, the proposed classifications of non-tumoral chronic PVT have evolved from being anatomy-based, to also incorporating functional parameters. However, none of the currently proposed classifications are directed towards decision-making, regarding the choice of inflow to the graft during transplantation and the outcomes thereof. The present scoping review i) addresses the limits of the currently available classifications in terms of surgical decisiveness, ii) clarifies the concept of physiological or non-physiological portal inflow reconstruction, and subsequently, iii) proposes a new classification of non-tumoral PVT in candidates for liver transplantation; to help tailor the surgical strategy to an individual patient, in order to provide portal inflow to the graft together with control of prehepatic portal hypertension whenever feasible.

No abstract

Caval inflow to the graft is an efficacious salvage technique with satisfactory long-term results, considering the spontaneous outcome in patients denied LT because of diffuse PVT. Adequate preoperative management of PHT and its associated complications is vital in obtaining good results. In the long term, residual PHT resolves and the liver function returns to normal.

Background Patients affected by HCC represent a vulnerable population during the COVID-19 pandemic and may suffer from the unusual allocation of healthcare resources. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of HCC patients within six French referral centers of the metropolitan area of Paris. Materials and methods We performed a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study on the management of patients affected by HCC during the first six weeks of COVID-19 pandemic (exposed), compared to the same period in 2019 (unexposed). Were included all patients discussed in multidisciplinary tumor meeting (MTB) and/or undergoing radiological or surgical programmed procedure during the study period, in a curative or palliative intent. Endpoints were the number of patients with a modification in the treatment strategy, or a delay in decision-to-treatment. Results After screening, n=670 patients were included (n=293 Exposed to COVID, n=377 Unexposed to COVID). A decrease of the numbers of patients with HCC presented in MTB in 2020 (p=0.034) and with a first diagnosis of HCC (n=104 Exposed to COVID, n=143 Unexposed to COVID, p=0.083) was find. Modification in the treatment strategy was observed in 13.1% of patients, with no differences between the two periods. Nevertheless 21.5% versus 9.5% of patients experienced a treatment delay longer than 1 month in 2020 compared to 2019 (p<0.001). In 2020, 7.1% (21/293) of patients had a diagnosis of an active COVID-19 infection: 11 (52.4%) were hospitalized, and 4 (19.1%) died. Conclusions In a metropolitan area highly impacted by COVID-19 pandemic, we observed a decreased number of cases of HCC, and similar rates of modification in treatment strategy, but with a treatment delay significantly longer in 2020 versus 2019.

No abstract

Although recurrence rates are high, surgical resection for solitary HCC offers good overall survival. Tumor size was not a prognostic factor. Solitary large HCC >10 cm would be a good candidate for hepatectomy as well as solitary HCC between 5 and 10 cm.

Liver resection using standard TVE with hypothermic portal perfusion and venovenous bypass is associated with a high mortality rate. The identification of preoperative predictors of mortality should improve the selection of patients for this aggressive surgery. Compared with nonsurgical management, the long-term results are acceptable and justify this aggressive surgery in selected patients.