Published data imply that normal faults in general are steeply inclined, and it is commonly assumed that faults of this class have developed habitually with dips of 45° or more. The writer has not seen in the literature many descriptions of large normal faults that have conspicuously low dips. Those that dip 25° or less usually are assumed to have been rotated from initially steep inclinations. Moreover, few published descriptions of large normal faults known to the writer cite evidence of decreasing dip with increasing depth, to indicate concavity of fault‐surfaces toward the hanging wall. Indeed, some structural geologists have argued that evidence favors steepening of ordinary normal faults downward, with resulting concavity toward the footwall‐block [see 12 of “References” at end of paper]. Pronounced concavity of a fault‐surface toward the hanging wall has been interpreted as a characteristic of superficial “landslide‐faulting”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.