The redox state of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) was measured with the peptide N-Acetyl-Asn-Tyr-Thr-Cys-NH2. The peptide diffused across cellular membranes; some became glycosylated and thus trapped within the secretory pathway, and its cysteine residue underwent reversible thiol-disulfide exchanges with the surrounding redox buffer. Glycosylated peptides from cells were disulfide-linked to glutathione, indicating that glutathione is the major redox buffer in the secretory pathway. The redox state of the secretory pathway was more oxidative than that of the cytosol; the ratio of reduced glutathione to the disulfide form (GSH/GSSG) within the secretory pathway ranged from 1:1 to 3:1, whereas the overall cellular GSH/GSSG ratio ranged from 30:1 to 100:1. Cytosolic glutathione was also transported into the lumen of microsomes in a cell-free system. Although how the ER maintains an oxidative environment is not known, these results suggest that the demonstrated preferential transport of GSSG compared to GSH into the ER lumen may contribute to this redox compartmentation.

The pharmacological effect of morphine as a painkiller is mediated mainly via the mu opioid receptor (MOR) and is dependent on the number of MORs in the cell surface membrane. While several studies have reported that the MOR gene is regulated by various cis-and trans-acting factors, many questions remain unanswered regarding in vivo regulation. The present study shows that epigenetic silencing and activation of the MOR gene are achieved through coordinated regulation at both the histone and DNA levels. In P19 mouse embryonal carcinoma cells, expression of the MOR was greatly increased after neuronal differentiation. MOR expression could also be induced by a demethylating agent (5-aza-2-deoxycytidine) or histone deacetylase inhibitors in the P19 cells, suggesting involvement of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation for MOR gene silencing. Analysis of CpG DNA methylation revealed that the proximal promoter region was unmethylated in differentiated cells compared to its hypermethylation in undifferentiated cells. In contrast, the methylation of other regions was not changed in either cell type. Similar methylation patterns were observed in the mouse brain. In vitro methylation of the MOR promoters suppressed promoter activity in the reporter assay. Upon differentiation, the in vivo interaction of MeCP2 was reduced in the MOR promoter region, coincident with histone modifications that are relevant to active transcription. When MeCP2 was disrupted using MeCP2 small interfering RNA, the endogenous MOR gene was increased. These data suggest that DNA methylation is closely linked to the MeCP2-mediated chromatin structure of the MOR gene. Here, we propose that an epigenetic mechanism consisting of DNA methylation and chromatin modification underlies the cell stage-specific mechanism of MOR gene expression.Opioids exert their pharmacological and physiological effects through binding to their endogenous receptors. Three types of opioid receptors, mu (), delta (␦), and kappa (), all belonging to the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily, have been cloned. Upon agonist binding, these receptors couple to G proteins and affect several signal transduction pathways thought to mediate a broad range of functions and pharmacological effects of endogenous and exogenous opioids (51). Previous studies suggested that the opioid receptor (MOR) plays a key role in mediating the major clinical effects of analgesics, such as morphine, as well as the development of tolerance and physical dependence upon prolonged administration (39). MOR is mainly expressed in the central nervous system, with densities varying greatly in different regions, which can display different functional roles (55). During mouse embryonic development, the MOR message was specifically observed as early as embryonic day 8.5 (E8.5) using the reverse transcription (RT)-PCR method (44). In contrast, MOR transcripts were detected only beginning at E12 using the radioligand binding method (70) and at E10.5 by in situ hybridization (85). Transcript levels gradually incr...

Purpose To determine the relative effectiveness, major complications, and refractive errors associated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) versus panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) to treat Type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Subjects Consecutive infants with Type 1 ROP who received either IVB or PRP between January 2008 and December 2012 and had at least six months of follow-up. Design Retrospective case series. Methods The data from infants treated with either IVB or PRP for Type 1 ROP between January 2008 and December 2012 were recorded from two medical centers in Atlanta, Georgia. Main Outcome Measures Recurrence rate, complication rate, refractive error. Results A total of 54 eyes (28 patients) with Type 1 ROP were evaluated: 22 eyes (11 patients) received IVB, and 32 eyes (17 patients) received PRP. Among the 22 eyes treated with IVB, 16 eyes had Zone I ROP and 6 eyes had posterior Zone II ROP. The number of Zone I and Zone II ROP eyes treated with PRP were 5 and 27 eyes, respectively. Mean gestational age, birth weight, postmenstrual age at the initial treatment, and follow-up period for the infants receiving IVB were 24.2 weeks, 668.1 grams, 35.1 weeks, and 21.7 weeks, respectively, and for the infants receiving PRP were 24.8, 701.4 grams, 36.1 weeks, and 34.5 weeks, respectively. ROP recurred in 3/22 (14%) IVB-treated eyes and in 1/32 (3%) PRP-treated eyes. None of IVB-treated eyes progressed to retinal detachment or developed macular ectopia. Only one eye went on to retinal detachment and five eyes developed macular ectopia in PRP-treated eyes. Mean spherical equivalent and postgestational age at the last refraction for IVB-treated eyes were −2.4 D and 22.4 months, respectively, and for PRP-treated eyes were −5.3 D and 37.1 months, respectively. Mean spherical equivalent for Zone I ROP eyes treated with IVB and PRP were −3.7 D and −10.1 D, respectively, and for Zone II ROP eyes were 0.6 D and −4.7 D, respectively. Conclusions Both IVB and PRP are effective treatment options for Type 1 ROP with low complication rates. Zone I ROP was associated with high minus refractive errors in eyes treated with either IVB or PRP.

No abstract

In the vertebrate retina, melatonin is synthesized by the photoreceptors with high levels of melatonin at night and lower levels during the day. Melatonin exerts its influence by interacting with a family of G-protein-coupled receptors that are negatively coupled with adenylyl cyclase. Melatonin receptors belonging to the subtypes MT1 and MT2 have been identified in the mammalian retina. MT1 and MT2 receptors are found in all layers of the neural retina and in the retinal pigmented epithelium. Melatonin in the eye is believed to be involved in the modulation of many important retinal functions; it can modulate the electroretinogram (ERG), and administration of exogenous melatonin increases light-induced photoreceptor degeneration. Melatonin may also have protective effects on retinal pigment epithelial cells, photoreceptors and ganglion cells. A series of studies have implicated melatonin in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration, and melatonin administration may represent a useful approach to prevent and treat glaucoma. Melatonin is used by millions of people around the world to retard aging, improve sleep performance, mitigate jet lag symptoms, and treat depression. Administration of exogenous melatonin at night may also be beneficial for ocular health, but additional investigation is needed to establish its potential.

No abstract

Poly(C)-binding proteins (PCBPs) are generally known as RNA-binding proteins that interact in a sequence-specific fashion with single-stranded poly(C). They can be divided into two groups: hnRNP K and PCBP1-4. These proteins are involved mainly in various posttranscriptional regulations (e.g., mRNA stabilization or translational activation/silencing). In this review, we summarize and discuss how PCBPs act as transcriptional regulators by binding to specific elements in gene promoters that interact with the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery. Transcriptional regulation of PCBPs might itself be regulated by their localization within the cell. For example, activation by p21-activated kinase 1 induces increased nuclear retention of PCBP1, as well as increased promoter activity. PCBPs can function as a signal-dependent and coordinated regulator of transcription in eukaryotic cells. We address the molecular mechanisms by which PCBPs binding to single-and double-stranded DNA mediates gene expression. KeywordsPoly(C)-binding proteins; p21-activated kinase 1; DNA-binding proteins; Transcriptional regulationThe poly(C)-binding proteins (PCBPs) are characterized by high affinity for, and sequencespecific interaction with polycytosine, poly(C). In mammalian cells, these PCBPs belong to one of two subsets: hnRNP K/J, or the alpha-complex proteins (e.g., PCBP1-4) [1]. hnRNP K, PCBP1, and PCBP2 have been studied in the greatest detail. The latter two proteins are also known as αCP1 and αCP2, or hnRNPE1 and hnRNPE2 [2,3]. Recently, two other members of the αCP family were discovered: PCBP3 (αCP3) and PCBP4 (αCP4) [4].PCBPs are expressed broadly in human and mouse tissues and demonstrate poly(C)-binding specificity [2,4,5]. All members of the PCBP family are related evolutionarily. The common feature of all PCBPs is the presence of three hnRNP K homology (KH) domains [1]; these are RNA-binding modules of about 70 amino acids in length. PCBP1 and PCBP2 share the highest level of amino acid sequence similarity (89%) [6]. PCBP3 is more divergent, and PCBP4 is the most distantly related (52% divergence from PCBP2 [4,7]. Members of this family perform multiple functions through their poly(C)-binding ability, including mRNA stabilization [8- Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. NIH Public Access Structure of PCBPsThe PCBPs contain three KH domains, two consecutive KH domains at the amino terminus and a third KH domain at the carboxyl terminus, separated by an intervening sequence of variable length (Fig. 1A). The structure of each KH domain consists of three α-helices...

No abstract