Background: Ultrasound is a promising imaging examination for type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). This study aimed to explore the risk factors of ultrasound diagnostic characteristics in the tibial nerves of patients with type 2 DPN. Methods:The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) was used for neuropathy evaluation, and 520 patients with type 2 diabetes were divided into a DPN group and non-DPN (NDPN) group with 2 points as the cut-off value. The two groups were matched at a ratio of 1:1 according to age, BMI, calf circumference, and gender, resulting in 44 matched pairs. The dependent variable was type 2 DPN and the concomitant variables were the width, thickness, cross-sectional area, and unclear honeycomb-like structure of the tibial nerve. A 1:1 matched conditional logistic regression model was established to analyze which ultrasound diagnostic characteristics of the tibial nerve were risk factors for type 2 DPN.Results: The thickness (OR =5.176, P=0.043) and cross-sectional area (OR =1.659, P=0.030) of the tibial nerve were risk factors for the diagnosis of DPN, while the width and unclear honeycomb-like structure of the nerve were not (P>0.05). In the diagnosis of DPN, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the cross-sectional area of the tibial nerve was 0.747, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 61.36%, 95.45%, 93.10%, and 71.20%, respectively.The area under the ROC curve of tibial nerve thickness was 0.867, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 81.82%, 90.91%, 90.00%, and 83.30%, respectively.The area under the ROC curve of thickness was larger than that of cross-sectional area of the tibial nerve (z statistic =1.800, P=0.07). Conclusions:The thickness and cross-sectional area of the tibial nerve measured by ultrasound are risk factors for type 2 DPN. The diagnostic sensitivity of the thickness is higher than the cross-sectional area, while the diagnostic specificity of the cross-sectional area is higher than the thickness.
Background: This study aimed to compare the differences of ultrasound findings between subhepatic appendicitis and appendicitis at a normal position, then discuss the diagnostic strategies and improve the accuracy of diagnosis.Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in our hospital. One thousand five hundred ninetyone patients with appendicitis were diagnosed from January 2014 to January 2018. Eighteen patients with subhepatic appendicitis and 25 patients with appendicitis with regular positions were selected randomly as the control group. The difference in ultrasound features between the two groups was studied. Comparisons between the two groups showed statistically significant differences in the frequencies of the fishbone sign, enlarged appendix, appendicoliths, and hyperechoic omental cap (P<0.05).Results: Statistical significance was not observed with the difference in the frequency of whether there was lymphadenectasis (P>0.05) in the abdominal cavity between the two groups. The Pareto chart was drawn to look for the main factors associated. The results of interpretation on the critical points of diagnosis for subhepatic appendicitis: (I) the fishbone sign of a dilated ileum in the right lower abdomen; and (II) the fishbone sign of a dilated ileum in the right lower abdomen + presence of an enlarged appendix in the right upper abdomen.Conclusions: An abnormally dilated ileum in the right lower abdomen -the fishbone sign, is a vital sign leading to the diagnosis of subhepatic appendicitis. The fishbone sign of a dilated ileum in the right lower abdomen + whether there is a vermiform structure is an important diagnostic indicator for subhepatic appendicitis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.