Objective To evaluate the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR), platelet-to-monocyte ratio (PMR), and neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio (NMR) as predictors for lupus nephritis (LN) patients without infection or as biomarkers for distinguishing between infection or flare with LN patients. Methods LN patients were divided into three groups: LN without infection, LN with infection, and LN with flare. A total of 57 healthy subjects were enrolled as controls. The differentiation was analyzed between LN without infection and control group, and LN with infection and LN with flare. Correlations among variables were assessed in the LN group without infection. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed in two comparable groups. Results NLR, PLR, and MLR were increased significantly in the LN group without infection as compared with those in healthy controls. NLR (area under the curve (AUC): 0.75) and MLR (AUC: 0.79) were useful for distinguishing between LN patients without infection and healthy subjects. In differentiating LN patients without infection from the controls, optimal cutoffs of NLR and MLR were 3.43 (sensitivity: 45.6%, specificity: 96.5%, and overall accuracy: 68.8%) and 0.24 (sensitivity: 75.0%, specificity: 73.7%, and overall accuracy: 73.6%), respectively. In addition, NLR ( r = 0.322, p = 0.011) and PLR ( r = 0.283, p = 0.026) were positively correlated with CRP. Importantly, NLR and NMR were increased while PNR was decreased in the LN group with infection in comparison with those in the LN group with flare. NLR (AUC: 0.80), NMR (AUC: 0.78), and PNR (AUC: 0.74) were useful in differentiating LN patients with infection and flare, and their optimal cutoffs were 4.02 (sensitivity: 82.6%, specificity: 69.6%, and overall accuracy: 75.5%), 12.19 (sensitivity: 80.4%, specificity: 73.9%, and overall accuracy: 77.5%), and 28.26 (sensitivity: 65.2%, specificity: 76.8%, and overall accuracy: 71.6%), respectively. Conclusions We demonstrated, for the first time, that MLR or NMR had the best accuracy in differentiating LN patients without infection from healthy subjects, or differentiating infection from flare in LN patients, respectively. Our results implied that NLR, MLR, PNR, and NMR may be useful biomarkers in predicting LN.

Background Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been reported to be associated with inflammation in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving dialysis. However, the value of NLR and PLR in non-dialysis patients with ESRD remains unclear. Methods Among 611 non-dialysis patients with ESRD in The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China (2012–2018), we compared NLR and PLR in patients with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels of ≤3 mg/L vs. > 3 mg/L. Correlation of NLR and PLR to hs-CRP, PCT, ferritin were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used for estimating sensitivity and specificity of NLR and PLR. Results NLR was higher in the patients with high hs-CRP levels (> 3 mg/L), compared to patients with low hs-CRP levels (≤ 3 mg/L) [5.74 (3.54–9.01) vs. 3.96 (2.86–5.85), p < 0.0001]. Additionally, PLR was higher in high hs-CRP group than in low group [175.28 (116.67–252.26) vs. 140.65 (110.51–235.17), p = 0.022]. In the current study, NLR and PLR were both positively correlated with hs-CRP (rs = 0.377, p = 0.000 for NLR; rs = 0.161, p = 0.001 for PLR), PCT, leukocytes, neutrophils, platelets, and age. NLR or PLR with a cut-off value of 5.07 or 163.80 indicated sensitivity and specificity were 65.67 and 66.37% (AUC = 0.69) or 57.21 and 57.52% (AUC = 0.55), respectively. Conclusions NLR or PLR was positively correlated with hs-CRP in non-dialysis patients with ESRD. NLR might be better for identifying inflammation than PLR in this population.

No abstract

No abstract