Background Determining the absence or presence of peripancreatic lymph nodal metastasis (PLNM) is important to the pathologic staging, prognostication, and guidance of treatment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Computed tomography and MRI had a poor sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of PLNM. Purposes To develop and validate a 3 T MRI primary tumor radiomics‐based nomogram from multicenter datasets for pretreatment prediction of the PLNM in PDAC patients. Study Type Retrospective. Subjects A total of 251 patients (156 men and 95 women; mean age, 60.85 ± 8.23 years) with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from three hospitals. Field Strength and Sequences A 3.0 T and fat‐suppressed T1‐weighted imaging. Assessment Quantitative imaging features were extracted from fat‐suppressed T1‐weighted (FS T1WI) images at the arterial phase. Statistical Tests Normally distributed data were compared by using t‐tests, while the Mann–Whitney U test was used to evaluate non‐normally distributed data. The diagnostic performances of the preoperative and postoperative nomograms were assessed in the external validation cohort with the area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). AUCs were compared with the De Long test. A p value below 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results The AUCs of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Rad‐score were 0.868 (95% confidence level [CI]: 0.613–0.852) and 0.772 (95% CI: 0.659–0.879) in the training and internal validation cohort, respectively. The preoperative and postoperative nomograms could accurately predict PLNM in the training cohort (AUC = 0.909 and 0.851) and were validated in both the internal and external cohorts (AUC = 0.835 and 0.805, 0.808 and 0.733, respectively). DCA indicated that the two novel nomograms are of similar clinical usefulness. Data Conclusion Pre−/postoperative nomograms and the constructed radiomics signature from primary tumor based on FS T1WI of arterial phase could serve as a potential tool to predict PLNM in patients with PDAC. Evidence Level 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 2

BACKGROUND Multifocal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), sometimes forming multiple pancreatic masses, is frequently misdiagnosed as pancreatic malignancy in routine clinical practice. It is critical to know the imaging features of multifocal-type AIP to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgery. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies evaluating the value of diffusionweighted imaging (DWI), axial fat-suppressed T1 weighted image (T1WI), and dynamic contrast enhanced-computed tomography (DCE-CT) in detecting the lesions of multifocal-type AIP. AIM To clarify the exact prevalence and radiological findings of multifocal AIP in our cohorts and compare the sensitivity of DWI, axial fat-suppressed T1WI, and DCE-CT for detecting AIP lesions. We also compared radiological features between multifocal AIP and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with several key imaging landmarks. METHODS Twenty-six patients with proven multifocal AIP were retrospectively included. Two blinded independent radiologists rated their confidence level in detecting the lesions on a 5-point scale and assessed the diagnostic performance of DWI, axial fat-suppressed T1WI, and DCE-CT. CT and magnetic resonance imaging of multifocal AIP were systematically reviewed for typical imaging findings and compared with the key imaging features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS Among 118 patients with AIP, 26 (22.0%) had multiple lesions (56 lesions). Ulcerative colitis was associated with multifocal AIP in 7.7% (2/26) of patients, and Crohn’s disease was present in 15.3% (4/26) of patients. In multifocal AIP, multiple lesions, delayed homogeneous enhancement, multifocal strictures of the main pancreatic duct, capsule-like rim, lower apparent diffusion coefficient values, and elevated serum Ig4 level were observed significantly more frequently than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, whereas the presence of capsule-like rim in multifocal-type AIP was lower in frequency than total AIP. Of these lesions of multifocal AIP, DWI detected 89.3% (50/56) and 82.1% (46/56) by the senior and junior radiologist, respectively. CONCLUSION Multifocal AIP is not as rare as previously thought and was seen in 22.0% of our patients. The diagnostic performance of DWI for detecting multifocal AIP was best followed by axial fat-suppressed T1WI and DCE-CT.