A B S T R A C TObjectives: Although the association between systemic infection and cardiovascular events has been identified, uncertainty remains regarding the incidence and prognosis of sepsis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The purpose of this research was to assess the impact of sepsis on survival after first AMI. Methods: This was a nationwide cohort study involving the analysis of data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database for the period 2000-2012, for patients with a primary diagnosis of first AMI. Among the 186 112 prospective patients, sepsis was diagnosed in 13 065 (7.0%). The propensity score matching technique was used to match 13 065 controls to the patients with sepsis and AMI with similar baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards regression models, including sepsis, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and comorbidities, were performed to further evaluate the different influences on the mortality risk in patients hospitalized for first AMI. Results: Overall, the 12-year survival rate was lower in AMI patients with sepsis than in those without sepsis (log rank p-value <0.001); this was also shown in the different age and sex groups. The AMI patients with sepsis had a longer length of hospital stay than those without sepsis (32.5 days vs. 11.74 days, p < 0.001). In the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, sepsis was an independent risk factor for mortality in patients after AMI (hazard ratio 1.78; 95% confidence interval 1.72-1.83). Interventional management with PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting improved survival in both the sepsis and non-sepsis patients after first AMI. Conclusions: In conclusion, sepsis significantly increased the mortality risk of patients after first AMI. PCI may improve the long-term survival of patients in comparison to those managed conservatively.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Many patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were found to have a multivessel disease. Uncertainty still exists in the optimal revascularization strategy in AMI patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of immediate multivessel revascularization compared with staged multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with AMI.Method: This was a nationwide cohort study of 186,112 patients first diagnosed with AMI, 78,699 of whom received PCI for revascularization. Patients who received repetitive PCI during the index hospitalization were referred to as staged multivessel PCI. Immediate multivessel PCI was defined as patients with two-vessel PCI or three-vessel PCI during the index procedure. Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to evaluate the different indicators of mortality risks in AMI.Result: Immediate multivessel PCI was associated with a worse long-term outcome than staged multivessel PCI during the index admission (log-rank P &lt; 0.001). There was a higher incidence of stroke in patients with multivessel PCI during hospitalization. In Cox analysis, immediate multivessel PCI was an independent risk factor for mortality compared to those with staged multivessel PCI, regardless of the type of myocardial infarction.Conclusion: This study demonstrated that performing immediate multivessel PCI for AMI may lead to worse long-term survival than staged multivessel PCI. Our findings emphasized the importance of PCI timing for non-infarct-related artery stenosis and provided information to supplement current evidence.

Background and Purpose: No previous study has compared the impact of dipyridamole-based triple antiplatelet therapy on secondary stroke prevention and long-term outcomes to that of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and previous stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of dipyridamole added to DAPT on stroke prevention and long-term outcomes in patients with cerebral infarction after first AMI.Methods: This nationwide, case-control study included 75,789 patients with cerebral infarction after first AMI. A 1:4 propensity score matching ratio was adopted based on multiple variables. Finally, the data of 4,468 patients included in the DAPT group and 1,117 patients included in the Dipyridamole-DAPT group were analyzed. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were cumulative event rate of recurrent MI or stroke, and cumulative intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and gastrointestinal bleeding rate.Results: Long-term survival rate was comparable between the two groups (log-rank P = 0.1117), regardless of sex analyses. However, after first year, DAPT subgroup revealed better survival over DAPT-dipyridamole subgroup (log-rank P = 0.0188). In age subgroup analysis, a lower survival rate was detected in younger patients from the Dipyridamole-DAPT group after first year (log-rank P = 0.0151), but no survival difference for older patients. No benefit of Dipyridamole-DAPT was detected for patients after AMI, regardless of the myocardial infarction type. DAPT was superior to Dipyridamole-DAPT in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (log-rank P = 0.0153) and ST elevation myocardial infarction after first year (log-rank P = 0.0019). Dipyridamole-DAPT did not reduce cumulative event rate of recurrent MI or stroke in patients after AMI. Moreover, Dipyridamole-DAPT increased the cumulative ICH rate (log-rank P = 0.0026), but did not affect the cumulative event rate of gastrointestinal bleeding. In Cox analysis, dipyridamole did not improve long-term survival.Conclusions: This nationwide study showed that Dipyridamole-DAPT, compared with DAPT, did not improve long-term survival in patients with stroke after AMI, and was related to poor outcomes after 1 year. Dipyridamole-DAPT did not reduce recurrent rate of MI or stroke, but increased the ICH rate without impacting the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Background:The etiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in the Han Chinese population is poorly understood. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess gene variants and associated functional annotations for PAH in Han Chinese patients. Methods: This is an ethnicity-based multi-centre study. Blood samples were collected from 20 PAH patients who volunteered for the study, and genetic tests were performed. The DAVID database was used to functionally annotate the genes BMPR2, ALK1, KCNK3, CAV1, and ENG. Associated diseases, functional categories, gene ontology, and protein interactions were analysed using the Functional Annotation Tool in the DAVID database. GEO and ClinVar databases were also used for further comparison with gene mutations in our study. Results: PAH patient with gene mutations were female predominant except for a single male with a BMPR2 mutation. Locus variants in our study included 'G410DfsX1' in BMPR2, 'ex7 L300P, ' 'ex4 S110PfsX40,' and 'ex7 E295Afs96X' in ALK1,' in CAV1, and 'ex8 D366H' in ENG were not found in the ClinVar database associated with PAH. In addition to BMP and TGF-β pathways, gene ontology of input genes in the DAVID database also included pathways associated with nitric oxide signaling and regulation. Conclusions: This Multi-centre study indicated that 'G410DfsX1' in BMPR2, 'ex7 L300P,' 'ex4 S110PfsX40,' 'ex7 E295Afs96X' in ALK1, 'c.-2C>A (IVS1-2 C>A)' in CAV1, and 'ex8 D366H' in ENG were identified in Han Chinese patients with PAH. Females were more susceptible to PAH, and a relatively young age distribution was observed for patients with BMPR2 mutations.

Over the past decades, the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been redefined with the incorporation of evidence from multiple clinical trials. Recommendations from guidelines are updated regularly to reduce morbidity and mortality. However, heterogeneous care systems, physician perspectives, and patient behavior still lead to a disparity between evidence and clinical practice. The quality of care has been established and become an integral part of modern healthcare in order to increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and adhere to professional knowledge. For patients with STEMI, measuring the quality of care is a multifactorial and multidimensional process that cannot be estimated solely based on patients’ clinical outcomes. The care of STEMI is similar to the concept of “the chain of survival” that emphasizes the importance of seamless integration of five links: early recognition and diagnosis, timely reperfusion, evidence-based medications, control of cholesterol, and cardiac rehabilitation. Serial quality indicators, reflecting the full spectrum of care, have become a widely used tool for assessing performance. Comprehension of every aspect of quality assessment and indicators might be too demanding for a physician. However, it is worthwhile to understand the concepts involved in quality improvement since every physician wants to provide better care for their patients. This article reviews a fundamental approach to quality care in STEMI.

Background and Purpose Combination therapy with dipyridamole and clopidogrel in stroke prevention and long-term outcomes in aspirin-intolerant patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and previous stroke are unknown. This nationwide study analyzed the impact of dipyridamole and clopidogrel on secondary stroke prevention and long-term outcomes in aspirin-intolerant stroke patients after AMI. Methods This was a nationwide, case-control study involving 186,112 first AMI patients, 78,607 of whom had a previous history of stroke. In the final analysis, we included 4637 patients taking clopidogrel alone and 208 patients using a combination of clopidogrel and dipyridamole. Results The 12-year survival rate was not different between clopidogrel and clopidogrel–dipyridamole groups (log-rank p = 0.6247). Furthermore, there were no differences in event-free survival after stroke (log-rank p = 0.6842), gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (log-rank p = 0.9539), or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH; log-rank p = 0.6191) between the two groups. Dipyridamole did not contribute significantly to AMI survival (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.84–1.15), and did not show benefits in any of the subgroups regardless of sex, age (younger or older than 75 years), comorbidities, percutaneous coronary intervention, or medications. Conclusion No differences were observed in the 12-year survival rate between clopidogrel and clopidogrel–dipyridamole groups. The two groups had balanced event-free survival in recurrent stroke, ICH, GI bleeding, and myocardial infarction.