DNR designation was late in terminally ill cancer patients. DNR-designated cancer patient indicators were high PPI scores, patients' prognostic awareness, family's diagnostic and prognostic awareness, and longer durations of care by the PCCS.
Background: The aim of our study was to assess the practical utility of the palliative prognostic index (PPI) as a prognostic tool used by nurse specialists in a hospice consultation setting in Taiwan The sensitivity and specificity for the poor prognosis group was 66% and 71%; the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 81% and 52%, respectively, to predict patient death within 21 days (area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.68). Conclusions: Assessment by PPI can accurately predict survival of terminal cancer patients receiving hospice consultation care. PPI is a simple tool and can be administered by nurse members of hospice consultation teams.
Combination of initial PPI and score change is more useful than initial PPI for identifying patients with poor outcomes in good prognostic groups and patients with better outcomes in poor prognostic groups.
This study aimed to compare the characteristics of patients with hematologic malignancies and solid cancers who received palliative care. A total of 124 patients with hematologic malignancy and 3032 patients with solid cancer, who received palliative care consultation services between 2006 and 2010 in a medical center in Taiwan, were retrospectively analyzed. Higher prevalence of oral stomatitis, diarrhea, and hematologic symptoms including infection, fever, severe anemia, and bleeding, and lower prevalence of constipation, abdominal distension, and pain were observed in patients with hematologic malignancies compared to that in patients with solid cancer. The interval from hospital admission to palliative care referral was longer for patients with hematologic malignancy than that for patients with solid cancer. Hematologists should refer patients earlier, and palliative care specialists should understand the specific needs of patients with hematologic malignancy.
BackgroundThe clinical course for hematologic malignancy varies widely and no prognostic tool is available for patients with a hematologic malignancy under palliative care. To assess the application of the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) as prognostic tools in patients with hematologic malignancies under palliative care.MethodsWe included 217 patients with pathologically proven hematologic malignancies under palliative care consultation service (PCCS) between January 2006 and December 2012 at a single medical center in Taiwan. Patients were categorized into subgroups by PPI, CCI, and GPS for survival analysis.ResultsThe median survival was 16 days (interquartile range, 4–47.5 days) for all patients and 204 patients (94%) died within 180 days after PCCS. There was a significant difference in survival among patients categorized using the PPI (median survival 49, 15, and 7 days in patients categorized into a good, intermittent, and poor prognostic group, respectively) and the GPS (median survival 66 and 13 days for GPS 0 and 1, respectively). There was no difference in survival between patients with a GPS score of 0 versus 2, or a CCI score of 0 versus ≥1. The survival time was significantly discriminated after stratifying patients with a good PPI score based on the CCI (median survival 102 and 41 days in patients with a CCI score of 0 and ≥1, respectively) from those with a poor PPI score by using the GPS (median survival 47 and 7 days in patients with GPS scores of 0 and 1–2, respectively).ConclusionsPPI is a useful prognosticator of life expectancy in terminally ill patients under palliative care for a hematologic malignancy. Concurrent use of the GPS and CCI improved the accuracy of prognostication using the PPI.
Disease awareness is affected by multiple factors related to the patients, their families, and the clinicians. The promotion of PCCS increased disease awareness among terminally ill cancer patients in Taiwan.
Family caregivers' quality of life (QOL) is an important indicator for end-of-life care, but appropriate assessment tools are unavailable in Taiwan. This correlational study therefore tested the psychometric properties of the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer Mandarin version (CQOLC-M) in 359 dyads of cancer patients with terminal illness and their family caregivers from 5 teaching hospitals throughout Taiwan. Caregivers' QOL, spiritual well-being, social support, pain intensity, and economic situation were assessed using the CQOLC-M and 4 established scales. The CQOLC-M had internal consistency reliability of .87. Construct validity was supported by factor analysis, hypothesis testing, and known-group comparison. Exploratory factor analysis showed 7 underlying factors explaining 48.15% of the variance. Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer Mandarin version scores correlated moderately with caregivers' social support (P < .01) and spiritual well-being (P < .01). Caregivers' QOL was inversely related to both patients' (F = 4.90; P = .008) and caregivers' average pain (t = -4.22; P < .001) in the past 24 hours. We suggest removing 4 items with factor loading of less than 0.4. Since caregivers' QOL depends on patients' and caregivers' physical dimensions, we recommend adding physical-related items to the CQOLC-M. Clinicians can improve caregivers' QOL not only by maintaining their health, social support, and spirituality but also by better managing the pain of patients with terminal illness.
Aims and objectives:To determine factors associated with nurses' spiritual care competencies.Background: Holistic nursing care includes biopsychosocial and spiritual care.However, nurses are limited by a lack of knowledge, time constraints and apprehension of assessing spiritual issues, which leaves them unable to assess and meet patients' spiritual needs. Thus, when patients experience spiritual distress, clinical nurses lose the opportunity to support spiritual growth and self-actualisation. In Taiwan, spiritual care, religion and culture are unique compared to those in other countries. Overall, factors associated with Taiwanese nurses' spiritual care competencies lack comprehensive exploration.
Methods:This study adopted a descriptive correlational design using cross-sectional survey (see Appendix S1). Cluster sampling was used to select clinical nurses from fourteen units of a medical centre and a regional hospital. Data were collected from January-June 2018 with a 97.03% response rate. Clinical nurses completed a background questionnaire, spiritual care practice questionnaire, spirituality and spiritual care-related scales. Data were analysed using descriptive and linear regression. This report followed the STROBE checklist.Results: Spiritual care competence ranged from 44-123 (mean 84.67 ± 12.88; range 27-135). The majority of clinical nurses rated their spiritual care competence as moderate (64-98). The significant factors associated with nurses' spiritual care competence were education, religion, interest in spiritual care, having role models, past life events, barriers to providing spiritual care of the spiritual care practice score, and spiritual attitude and involvement score. The overall model was significant (p < .001) and accounted for 55.0% of variance (adjusted R 2 = .488).
Conclusions: Most clinical nurses have moderate spiritual care competence. Objective factors identified affect clinical nurses' spiritual care competencies. Relevance to clinical practice: To improve nurses' spiritual care competencies, objective factors that affect clinical nurses' spiritual care competencies must be
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.