Background
The da Vinci Surgical System has facilitated considerable advancements in surgery. The process and results of robot‐assisted microvascular anastomosis in real clinical situations have rarely been reported. This study presents our experience of performing robot‐assisted microvascular anastomosis in free flap reconstruction in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.
Patients and methods
This was a retrospective study of reconstructive operations using a free radial forearm flap for oropharyngeal defects after tumor extirpation in 15 consecutive adult patients (12 men and 3 women). In total, 17 robot‐assisted microvascular vessel anastomoses (2 arteries and 15 veins) were performed; moreover, 13 arteries and 13 veins were anastomosed using the standard operating microscope and hand‐sewing technique.
Results
The recipient and donor vessel diameters were 2.5 ± 0.7 and 2.1 ± 0.8 mm, respectively. The donor blood vessel diameter selected for anastomosis using da Vinci Surgical System was significantly smaller (2.1 ± 0.8 vs. 2.5 ± 0.6 mm) than that for a standard operating microscope and hand‐sewing technique (p = .021), the operating time spent (38.4 ± 10.4 vs. 28.0 ± 7.7 min) was significantly longer (p < .001). The vascular patency rate was 100%, and all flaps survived without requiring additional operation for revision.
Conclusion
Robotic surgical systems can facilitate vascular microanastomosis and provide a blood vessel patency rate comparable to that of a standard operating microscope and hand‐sewing technique.
The application of a robotic surgical system seems to be a safe option in the free flap reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects without lip or mandible splitting.
Background: Anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap is one of the most popular options for surgeons when reconstructing head and neck defects. When the recipient vessels are located in a remote site, a flap with adequate pedicle length is essential.The conventional methods of either pedicle elongation or fabricating combined flap increase the total surgical time. We present the experience on the use of what in situ pedicle lengthening and perforator shifting technique to overcome these problems.Methods: Fifteen patients with an age range of 38-65 years underwent in situ vascular transposition microsurgery of the ALT free flap harvest during head and neck reconstruction. Fourteen patients were male and one was female. Indications for reconstruction were malignant neoplasm in 14 patients and osteoradionecrosis in one patient. In this series, the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral vessels was used for interposition grafts. If the pedicle length was insufficient, the interposition grafts were used to lengthen the pedicle. The interposition grafts could also bridge different perforasomes in the thigh region in complex head and neck reconstruction.Results: Of the 15 patients, 11 received the in situ pedicle lengthening technique, while four patients received in situ fabricated combined techniques. After surgery, all of the patients were followed up for at least 3 months. Two partial wounds involving poor healing occurred but finally healed after debridement. There were two major complications: one case involved venous thrombosis of the anastomosis and the other suffered from hematoma. Both cases were salvaged. All of the 15 free ALT flaps were successful.
Conclusions:The alternative method employed in this series was able to solve the ALT flap perforator variation. Although the enrolled cases were confined to only head and neck reconstruction in the series, the in situ technique of the ALT flaps could be administered during reconstruction in other regions.
There is no significant difference in complications or revision rates between the robot-assisted and conventional oropharyngeal reconstructions. The functional postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted reconstructions are superior to those of conventional reconstructions. Robotic surgical systems provide a safe option with optimal postoperative oral function for the free flap reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects without lip or mandible splitting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.