Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have been implicated in atherothrombosis; however, their potential role as markers of risk is unclear. We investigated whether circulating NETs-related components associated with clinical outcome and hypercoagulability in St-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In this observational cohort study, STEMI patients admitted for PCI (n = 956) were followed for median 4.6 years, recording 190 events (reinfarction, unscheduled revascularization, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, or death). Serum drawn median 18 hours post-PCI was used to quantify double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and the more specific NETs markers myeloperoxidase-DNA and citrullinated histone 3. Levels of the NETs markers did not differ significantly between groups with/without a primary composite endpoint. However, patients who died (n = 76) had higher dsDNA compared to survivors (p < 0.001). Above-median dsDNA was associated with an increased number of deaths (54 vs. 22, p < 0.001). dsDNA in the upper quartiles (Q) was associated with increased mortality (Q3 vs. Q1 + 2 adjusted HR: 1.89 [95% CI 1.03 to 3.49], p = 0.041 and Q4 vs. Q1 + 2 adjusted HR: 2.28 [95% CI 1.19 to 4.36], p = 0.013). dsDNA was weakly correlated with D-dimer (r s = 0.17, p < 0.001). dsDNA levels associated with increased all-cause mortality, yet weakly with hypercoagulability in STEMI patients. The prognostic significance of potentially NETs-related markers requires further exploration. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) often results from erosion or rupture of atherosclerotic plaques followed by thrombosis, ischemia, and myocardial injury. It has been suggested that the risk-stratification of ACS patients should be expanded to include new soluble biomarkers, which may help individualize treatment 1. Potential candidates include components of the innate immune response, widely accepted to be important in the immediate aftermath of ACS, yet still not completely understood. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) were first described in 2004 by Brinkmann and colleagues, who documented the expulsion of extracellular webbed structures comprising deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and histones, studded with neutrophil granule proteins 2. The process of NETs release, or NETosis, is initiated by granular proteins such as myeloperoxidase (MPO), neutrophil elastase, and peptidylarginine deiminase 4 3. The latter mediates the citrullination of histone 3, inducing chromatin decondensation before extracellular release 3. Circulating NETs-associated components may contribute to endothelial dysfunction and plaque instability 4 , as well as coronary thrombus formation 5 by activating platelets, triggering the coagulation cascade, and trapping thrombus constituents 6,7. Nevertheless, it is not yet clear how NETs per se are implicated in the fine balance between beneficial and deleterious effects of inflammation after revascularization.
Objectives: Women with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) previously received less invasive evaluation and experienced higher mortality than men. After improvements in AMI care it is unclear whether gender differences still exist in management and outcome of AMI. Methods: All patients admitted to Ullevål University Hospital for AMI during 2006 and 2007 were included in this cohort study. Predefined data were recorded during the hospital stay, and the survival status of the patients was ascertained on June 30, 2008. Results: A total of 931 women and 2,174 men were included. No gender differences were observed in treatment delay or age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of invasive evaluation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), women were less likely than men to undergo coronary angiography (adjusted OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53–0.99, p = 0.044) and percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47–0.76, p = 0.0001). Age-adjusted in-hospital mortality and long-term survival were similar between men and women. Conclusions: Women with STEMI experienced similar treatment delays and odds of invasive evaluation as men. However, gender differences in invasive evaluation were still observed in NSTEMI patients. No sex differences were observed in age-adjusted early and long-term mortality.
Background Clinical complexity is increasingly prevalent among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The ‘Atrial fibrillation Better Care’ (ABC) pathway approach has been proposed to streamline a more holistic and integrated approach to AF care; however, there are limited data on its usefulness among clinically complex patients. We aim to determine the impact of ABC pathway in a contemporary cohort of clinically complex AF patients. Methods From the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry, we analysed clinically complex AF patients, defined as the presence of frailty, multimorbidity and/or polypharmacy. A K-medoids cluster analysis was performed to identify different groups of clinical complexity. The impact of an ABC-adherent approach on major outcomes was analysed through Cox-regression analyses and delay of event (DoE) analyses. Results Among 9966 AF patients included, 8289 (83.1%) were clinically complex. Adherence to the ABC pathway in the clinically complex group reduced the risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.72, 95%CI 0.58–0.91), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; aHR: 0.68, 95%CI 0.52–0.87) and composite outcome (aHR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.58–0.85). Adherence to the ABC pathway was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death (aHR: 0.74, 95%CI 0.56–0.98) and composite outcome (aHR: 0.76, 95%CI 0.60–0.96) also in the high-complexity cluster; similar trends were observed for MACEs. In DoE analyses, an ABC-adherent approach resulted in significant gains in event-free survival for all the outcomes investigated in clinically complex patients. Based on absolute risk reduction at 1 year of follow-up, the number needed to treat for ABC pathway adherence was 24 for all-cause death, 31 for MACEs and 20 for the composite outcome. Conclusions An ABC-adherent approach reduces the risk of major outcomes in clinically complex AF patients. Ensuring adherence to the ABC pathway is essential to improve clinical outcomes among clinically complex AF patients.
Aims The 4S-AF classification scheme comprises of four domains: stroke risk (St), symptoms (Sy), severity of atrial fibrillation (AF) burden (Sb), and substrate (Su). We sought to examine the implementation of the 4S-AF scheme in the EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry and compare outcomes in AF patients according to the 4S-AF-led decision-making process. Methods and results Atrial fibrillation patients from 250 centres across 27 European countries were included. A 4S-AF score was calculated as the sum of each domain with a maximum score of 9. Of 6321 patients, 8.4% had low (St), 47.5% EHRA I (Sy), 40.5% newly diagnosed or paroxysmal AF (Sb), and 5.1% no cardiovascular risk factors or left atrial enlargement (Su). Median follow-up was 24 months. Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, independent predictors of all-cause mortality were (St) [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 8.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.60–25.9], (Sb) (aHR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.08–1.35), and (Su) (aHR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.14–1.41). For CV mortality and any thromboembolic event, only (Su) (aHR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.45–2.06) and (Sy) (aHR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.00–1.66) were statistically significant, respectively. None of the domains were independently linked to ischaemic stroke or major bleeding. Higher 4S-AF score was related to a significant increase in all-cause mortality, CV mortality, any thromboembolic event, and ischaemic stroke but not major bleeding. Treatment of all 4S-AF domains was associated with an independent decrease in all-cause mortality (aHR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55–0.92). For each 4S-AF domain left untreated, the risk of all-cause mortality increased substantially (aHR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.16–1.56). Conclusion Implementation of the novel 4S-AF scheme is feasible, and treatment decisions based on this scheme improve mortality rates in AF.
IntroductionPlatelet activation, thrombin generation and fibrin formation play important roles in intracoronary thrombus formation, which may lead to acute myocardial infarction.We investigated whether the prothrombotic markers D-dimer, pro-thrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) are associated with myocardial necrosis assessed by Troponin T (TnT), and left ventricular impairment assessed by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).Materials/MethodsPatients (n = 987) with ST-elevation mycardial infarction (STEMI) were included. Blood samples were drawn at a median time of 24 h after onset of symptoms.ResultsStatistically significant correlations were found between both peak TnT and D-dimer (p < 0.001) and F1 + 2 (p < 0.001), and between NT-proBNP and D-dimer (p = 0.001) and F1 + 2 (p < 0.001). When dividing TnT and NT-proBNP levels into quartiles there were significant trends for increased levels of both markers across quartiles (all p < 0.001) D-dimer remained significantly associated with NT-proBNP after adjustments for covariates (p = 0.001) whereas the association between NTproBNP and F1 + 2 was no longer statistically significant (p = 0.324).A significant inverse correlation was found between LVEF and D-dimer (p < 0.001) and F1 + 2 (p = 0.013). When dichotomizing LVEF levels at 40 %, we observed significantly higher levels of both D-dimer (p < 0.001) and F1 + 2 (p = 0.016) in the group with low EF (n = 147).Summary/conclusionIn our cohort of STEMI patients we demonstrated that levels of D-dimer and F1 + 2 were significantly associated with myocardial necrosis as assessed by peak TnT. High levels of these coagulation markers in patients with low LVEF and high NTproBNP may indicate a hypercoagulable state in patients with impaired myocardial function.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.