No abstract

Objective Cognitive impairment (CI) is highly prevalent in breast cancer survivors (BCS), and can be a barrier to health‐promoting behaviours. However, the ways in which CI may affect self‐regulation or motivation to perform such behaviours have not been explored. We assessed if BCS with CI report greater extrinsic self‐regulation compared to those without CI and if this relationship persists after controlling for depression. Methods We recruited BCS with diabetes and assessed cognition and motivation to perform healthy diabetes management behaviours (e.g., diet and exercise). Participants completed a cognitive battery evaluating attention, working memory, executive functioning (EF), processing speed (PS), language and memory. The Treatment Self‐Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) assessed intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. Depression was determined by a score ≥16 on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Wilcoxon rank‐sum test compared associations between CI and TSRQ scores. Results Participants were 118 older adults (mean age 65 years). Participants with CI in the following domains had higher extrinsic self‐regulation scores compared to those without CI: attention (p < 0.01), PS (p = 0.01), EF (p < 0.01), language (p = 0.02; p = 0.04) and memory (p = 0.04; p = 0.03). After adjusting for depression, the relationship between CI and higher extrinsic self‐regulation scores remained significant. Conclusions BCS with CI appear to rely more on external sources of motivation to perform health behaviours, regardless of depression. Future studies and interventions to improve health behaviours should consider screening for CI and involving caregivers for those with CI to improve outcomes.

No abstract

Introduction: Advances in breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and treatment have increased the number of long-term survivors. Consequently, survivors of primary BC are at a greater risk of developing second primary cancers (SPCs). The risk factors for SPCs among BC survivors including sociodemographic, cancer treatment, comorbidities, and other medications have not been comprehensively examined. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence and clinicopathologic factors associated with risk of SPCs. Methods: We analyzed 170, 639 women with early-stage primary BC diagnosed between January 2000-December 2015 from the Medicare-linked Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER-Medicare) database. SPC was defined as any diagnosis of malignancy occurring within the study period and at least two months after primary BC diagnosis. Univariate analyses compared baseline characteristics between those who developed a SPC and those who did not. We evaluated the cause-specific hazard of developing a SPC in the presence of death as a competing risk.Results: Of the study cohort, 20,838 (12%) of BC survivors developed a SPC and BC was the most common SPC type (32%). The median time to SPC was 42 months. Women who were white, older, and with fewer comorbidities were more likely to develop a SPC. While statins [hazard ratio (HR) 1.060 (1.016 - 1.106)] and anti-hypertensives [HR 1.517 (1.461 – 1.575)] increased the hazard of developing a SPC, aromatase inhibitor therapy [HR 0.588 (0.542 – 0.638)] and bisphosphonates [HR 0.897 (0.848 – 0.949)] were associated with a decreased hazard of developing any SPC, including non-breast SPCs.Conclusion: Our study shows that specific clinical factors including type of cancer treatment, medications, and comorbidities are associated with increased risk for the development of SPCs among older BC survivors. These results can increase patient and clinician awareness, target cancer screening among BC survivors, as well as developing risk-adapted management strategies.

No abstract