Comparative studies on social evolution are ideally based on large datasets to ensure high statistical power, but their scientific validity also relies on the quality of the data. However, even though social organization, i.e., the composition of social units, is measured in many field studies testing specific hypotheses, these data are often not adequately reported. Here, 2 we summarise which data on social organization should always be reported regardless of the study focus to make them available for comparative studies. As an example, we report data from a literature survey on one of the four superorders of placental mammals, the Xenarthra from South America (armadillos, anteaters and sloths), of which all 30 species are generally assumed to be solitary living. In total we found 4510 articles. The titles and abstracts of 61 publications indicated that data on social organization were collected, but only 12 publications contained sufficient information for us to determine the social organization. We found reliable information on nine species, of which seven were strictly solitary. Two species showed a combination of solitary-living and pair-living with one including female groups. This review therefore indicates that Xenarthra may not be exclusively solitary. Our literature survey further shows that valuable data are often not reported even though it can be assumed that these data had been collected. We report examples from 23 additional studies on monotremes, marsupials, and two other placental superorders showing similar issues in reporting data. It is important to make authors aware that this information would be valuable for comparative studies. In sum, we recommend including data on the composition of social units, sex of individuals, occupancy of sleeping sites, frequency of observations and trapping events, home range overlap, and the proportion of the individuals in the study area, independent of the study question in all publications.

Elephant‐shrews (Macroscelidea) have long been considered the only mammalian order to be completely monogamous, based on observations of their pair‐living social organization. We reviewed primary studies on the four components of social systems (social organization, mating system, social structure, and care system) in elephant‐shrews to evaluate whether they truly are monogamous. To identify gaps in our knowledge of their social system, we reviewed evidence for a pair‐living social organization, mate fidelity (mating system), pair bonds (social structure), and biparental care (care system). Field data were available for eight species and seven were often pair‐living. However, these seven species exhibited intra‐specific variation in social organization; two of these species were also solitary living, two species were also group‐living, and the remaining three species were both solitary and group‐living. The eighth species was exclusively solitary. We reconstructed the ancestral social organization of Macroscelidea using Bayesian phylogenetic mixed‐effects models and found that variable social organization, rather than exclusive pair‐living, was the most likely ancestral state, though there was high uncertainty. No socio‐ecological factors (body size, population density, and habitat) predicted a specific social organization. Observations of mating have been rare, such that no firm statements can be made. However, one unpublished study indicated high levels of extra‐pair paternity. Regarding social structure, there was no evidence of pair‐bonding, but there was evidence of mate guarding. Only maternal care has been observed, with females having very short nursing bouts. Evidence suggests that despite having often a pair‐living form of social organization, Macroscelidea should not be described as a monogamous order, as little or no evidence supports that designation, nor are they exclusively pair‐living (social organization) and we urge further field studies on Macroscelidea social systems.

It is generally believed that marsupials are more primitive than placentals mammals and mainly solitary living, representing the ancestral form of social organization of all mammals. However, field studies have observed pair and group-living in marsupial species, but no comparative study about their social evolution was ever done. Here, we describe the results of primary literature research on marsupial social organization which indicates that most species can live in pairs or groups and many show intra-specific variation in social organization. Using Bayesian phylogenetic mixed-effects models with a weak phylogenetic signal of 0.18, we found that solitary living was the most likely ancestral form (35% posterior probability), but had high uncertainty, and the combined probability of a partly sociable marsupial ancestor (65%) should not be overlooked. For Australian marsupials, group-living species were less likely to be found in tropical rainforest, and species with a variable social organization were associated with low and unpredictable precipitation representing deserts. Our results suggest that modern marsupials are more sociable than previously believed and that there is no strong support that their ancestral state was strictly solitary living, such that the assumption of a solitary ancestral state of all mammals may also need reconsideration.

No abstract