Background. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are associated with significant morbidity and high frequency of antibiotic prescription. Diagnosing UTI is often difficult, particularly in the critically ill patient and in patients with unspecific and mild symptoms. The standard rapid tests have limited value, and there is a need for more reliable diagnostic tools. Heparin-binding protein (HBP) is released from neutrophils and has previously been studied as a diagnostic and predictive biomarker in different bacterial infections.Methods. This prospective survey enrolled adult patients at 2 primary care units and 2 hospital emergency departments, to investigate in urine HBP as a biomarker of UTI. In addition, urine levels of interleukin-6, white blood cells, and nitrite were analyzed and compared with HBP. Based on symptoms of UTI and microbiological findings, patients were classified into different groups, UTI (cystitis and pyelonephritis) and no UTI.Results. Three hundred ninety patients were evaluated. The prevalence of UTI in the study group was 45.4%. The sensitivity and specificity for HBP in urine as a marker for UTI were 89.2% and 89.8%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 90.2% and 88.8%, respectively. Heparin-binding protein was the best diagnostic marker for UTI, with an area-under-curve value of 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.93–0.96). Heparin-binding protein was significantly better in distinguishing cystitis from pyelonephritis, compared with the other markers.Conclusions. An elevated level of HBP in the urine is associated with UTI and may be a useful diagnostic marker in adult patients with a suspected UTI.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background and Aims Transient elastography (TE) has largely replaced liver biopsy to evaluate fibrosis stage and cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C. Previous studies have reported excellent reliability of TE but agreement metrics have not been reported. This study aimed to assess interrater agreement and reliability of repeated TE measurements. Methods Two operators performed TE independently, directly after each other. The primary outcome was disagreement, defined as a difference in TE results between operators of ≥33%, as well as the smallest detectable change, SDC 95 (i.e., the difference between measurements needed to state with 95% certainty that there is a difference in underlying stiffness). Secondary outcomes included reliability, measured as intraclass correlation (ICC), and patient and examination characteristics associated with the agreement. Results In total, 65 patients were included, with a mean liver stiffness of 9.7 kPa. Of these, 21 (32%) had a disagreement in TE results of ≥33% between the two operators. The SDC 95 on the log scale was 1.97, indicating that an almost twofold increase or decrease in liver stiffness would be required to confidently represent a change in the underlying fibrosis. Reliability, estimated using the ICC, was acceptable at 0.86. In a post hoc analysis, fasting less than 5 h before TE was associated with a higher degree of disagreement (48% vs. 19%, p = 0.03). Conclusions In our clinical setting, interrater agreement in directly repeated TE measurements was surprisingly low. It is essential to further investigate the reliability and agreement of TE to determine its validity and usefulness.