Background: Hospice agencies face unique challenges during times of widespread public health emergencies. The pandemic of novel coronavirus disease COVID-19 is widely affecting global healthcare systems. Aim: This study assesses effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on U.S. hospice agencies, staff, and patients as reported by hospice agency staff. Design: An anonymous electronic survey was developed. Free-text comments were assessed for impacts on hospice agencies, staff, and patients and their families. Setting/Participants: The target audience was members of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association who self-identified as being active with hospice agencies in the United States. Results: Reported impacts include inadequate supplies of personal protective equipment, changes in hospice services, and decreased access by hospice personnel to patients in long term care facilities. Flow of patients through hospice care settings was impeded. Agencies experienced changes in workforce availability and increased emotional support needs of staff. Patient and families experienced increased bereavement needs. Nearly one-third of respondents reported negative effects on patient outcomes, such as inadequate symptom management and negative psychosocial effects. Conclusion: Respondents indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic had negative effects on both hospice patient care and hospice agency functioning. Hospice agencies appear to face challenges unique among U.S. healthcare agencies due to their service delivery model and focus on interdisciplinary care. There is need for further exploration of the effects that the COVID-19 pandemic has on hospice agencies in order to improve care for their patient population during public health emergencies.
Objectives: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requirements for Emergency Preparedness Planning (EPP) by hospice organizations significantly increased in 2017. This study seeks to assess the involvement of various hospice personnel in EPP before and since the onset of the novel coronavirus disease COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A link to an anonymous online survey was sent to members of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association, targeting members involved in hospice care in the United States. A descriptive analysis of the data was performed. Results: Prior to the pandemic, 39.8% of respondents were “moderately” or “very” involved with the development and revisions of the Emergency Preparedness Plan. Since the beginning of the pandemic, this increased to 59%, which largely occurred among physicians. Clinical Nurse and Nurse Practitioner involvement in development/revisions remained low. Approximately 30% of respondents desired more involvement across the areas of EPP. Conclusion: The involvement of personnel of various disciplines is varied and the involvement of physicians appears to have increased with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. A notable portion of personnel desired more involvement across all aspects of EPP. More research is needed in this important but little-understood area.
Objectives Our study sought to further characterize patterns of medical cannabis use in elderly cancer patients. Furthermore, we sought to assess efficacy of medical cannabis for the treatment of pain, nausea, anorexia, insomnia and anxiety in elderly cancer patients. Background Medical cannabis use is growing for symptom management in cancer patients, but limited data exists on the safety or efficacy of use in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective chart review assessing changes in numerical symptom scores reported at clinic visits before and after medical cannabis initiation. Results There was no statistically significant difference in pain, nausea, appetite, insomnia or anxiety scores reported before and after initiation of medical cannabis. Oil was the most common form used, followed by vape, and the most common ratios used were high tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to cannabidiol (CBD) and equal parts THC/CBD products. Conclusion This study did not find a statistically significant change in symptom scores with medical cannabis use, although further study is warranted given the limitations of the present study. Elderly patients most commonly are using equal parts THC/CBD or high THC ratio products initially.
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is a common AIDS-defining malignancy among people living with HIV. Of the different types of NHLs, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common. Prognosis of DLBCL has improved over the years in the general population but remains relatively poor in HIV-positive individuals. Almost any organ system can be affected by DLBCL; however, cardiac involvement remains rare and suggests aggressive disease. We present a case of DLBCL in an HIV-positive patient, who had cardiac involvement, with the only clue to cardiac involvement being symptom being tachycardia and dysphagia.
Hypothyroidism is common, with an extreme manifestation of myxedema coma if untreated. Hematologic consequences of myxedema coma include mild leukopenia and anemia, rarely pancytopenia. We present a patient with typical symptoms of myxedema coma, but found to be pancytopenic, with sustained response to levothyroxine and blood transfusion for anemia.
Key Clinical MessageUpper extremity lymphedema and cutaneous spread are atypical behavior of prostate disease and should be kept in the differential for selected patients. This presentation in these patients may be underdiagnosed and potentially an ominous sign. Our case adds to our continued learning of possible prostate malignancy behavior.
13 Background: Use of medical cannabis (MC) for cancer-related symptoms is growing, yet many prior studies used formulations not available in the United States (US). Clinical data on formulation, dosing and efficacy for formulations available in the US is limited. Furthermore, though interest is growing in the use of MC for elderly patients, data on safety and efficacy in this population is limited. We aimed to assess the clinical characteristics of elderly people using MC, formulations prescribed, and efficacy for cancer-related pain, insomnia and anxiety. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients age 65 and older prescribed MC in the year 2018 in an outpatient palliative care clinic at a tertiary comprehensive cancer center. Pain intensity and anxiety were measured by numerical rating (0-10), and insomnia was assessed by self-reported hours of sleep per night, with data collected at consecutive clinic visits before and after MC use. Results: Eighty-three patients aged 65 and over were included in our analysis. Half of patients were age 65-70, while 12% were age 76 or older. Slightly more than half were male (58%), while the majority were Caucasian (92%). For patients with pain, two thirds were already prescribed opioids; 28% were using gabapentin/pregabalin, 22% duloxetine, and 7% nortriptyline/amitriptyline. Two-thirds (65%) reported never using cannabis previously. The most common MC product used was oil (35%), followed by vape (13%), pill (6%) and powder (3%). The most common initial concentrations were equal THC/CBD (41%) and high THC (43%); 8% of patients used high CBD, and 8% used a combination. The median delta pain score did not change with use of MC (delta pain = 0.0, p = 0.72), nor did anxiety (delta anxiety = -0.2, p = 1.00) nor insomnia (delta hours sleep = -0.1, p = 1.000). Conclusions: In this study of elderly patients prescribed MC, the majority of whom were cannabis naïve and already prescribed opioids, most were initially prescribed high THC or 1:1 THC/CBD, with oil and vape the most common formulations used. Use of MC was not associated with changes in pain, anxiety nor insomnia scores.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.