Background
In response to the overdose epidemic, a network of support groups for family members in Massachusetts has been providing overdose education and naloxone rescue kits (OEN). The aims of this study were to describe the characteristics, motivations and benefits of family members who receive OEN and to describe the frequency of naloxone used during an overdose rescue.
Methods
This cross-sectional, multisite study surveyed attendees of community support groups for family members of opioid users where OEN training was offered using a 42 item self-administered survey that included demographics, relationship to opioid user, experience with overdose, motivations to receive OEN, and naloxone rescue kit use.
Results
Of 126 attendees who completed surveys at 8 sites, most attendees were white (95%), female (78%), married or partnered (74%), parents of an opioid user (85%), and provide financial support for opioid user (52%). The OEN trainees (79%) were more likely than attendees not trained (21%) to be parents of an opioid user (91% v 65%, p <0.05), provide financial support to an opioid user (58% v 30%, p <0.05), and to have witnessed an overdose (35% v 12%, p=0.07). The major motivations to receive training were: wanting a kit in their home (72%), education provided at the meeting (60%) and hearing about benefits from others (57%). Sixteen parents reported witnessing their child overdose and five attendees had used naloxone successfully during an overdose rescue.
Conclusions
Support groups for families of people who use opioids are promising venues to conduct overdose prevention trainings, because attendees are motivated to receive training and will use naloxone to rescue people when witnessing an overdose. Further study is warranted to understand how to optimize this approach to overdose prevention in the community setting.
Additional information:
Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.
We incorporate the non-linear clustering of dark matter halos, as modelled by Jose et al. (2016) into the halo model to better understand the clustering of Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) in the redshift range z = 3 − 5. We find that, with this change, the predicted LBG clustering increases significantly on quasi-linear scales (0.1 ≤ r / h −1 Mpc ≤ 10) compared to that in the linear halo bias model. This in turn results in an increase in the clustering of LBGs by an order of magnitude on angular scales 5 ≤ θ ≤ 100 . Remarkably, the predictions of our new model on the whole remove the systematic discrepancy between the linear halo bias predictions and the observations. The correlation length and large scale galaxy bias of LBGs are found to be significantly higher in the non-linear halo bias model than in the linear halo bias model. The resulting two-point correlation function retains an approximate power-law form in contrast with that computed using the linear halo bias theory. We also find that the non-linear clustering of LBGs increases with increasing luminosity and redshift. Our work emphasizes the importance of using non-linear halo bias in order to model the clustering of high-z galaxies to probe the physics of galaxy formation and extract cosmological parameters reliably.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.