No abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is mediator of inflammation that regulates tissue regeneration, but its continual activation has been associated with carcinogenesis. Little is known about factors in the PGE2 signaling pathway that contribute to tumor formation. We investigated whether yes associated protein 1 (YAP1), a transcriptional co-activator in the Hippo signaling pathway, mediates PGE2 function. METHODS DLD-1 and SW480 colon cancer cell lines were transfected with vectors expressing transgenes or small hairpin RNAs and incubated with recombinant PGE2, with or without pharmacologic inhibitors of signaling proteins, and analyzed by immunoblot, immunofluorescence, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, transcriptional reporter, and proliferation assays. Dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) was given to induce colitis in C57/BL6 (control) mice, as well as in mice with disruption of the hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase 15 gene (15-PGDH-knockout mice), Yap1 gene (YAP-knockout mice), and double knockout mice. Some mice were also given indomethacin to block PGE2 synthesis. 15-PGDH knockout mice were crossed with mice with intestine-specific disruption of the Salvador family WW domain containing 1 gene (Sav1), which encodes an activator of Hippo signaling. We performed immunohistochemical analyses of colon biopsy samples from 26 patients with colitis-associated cancer and 51 age- and sex-matched patients with colorectal cancer (without colitis). RESULTS Incubation of colon cancer cell lines with PGE2 led to phosphorylation of cAMP responsive element binding protein 1 (CREB1) and increased levels of YAP1 mRNA and protein and YAP1’s transcriptional activity. This led to increased transcription of the prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 gene (PTGS2 or COX2) and prostaglandin E receptor 4 gene (PTGER4 or EP4). Incubation with PGE2 promoted proliferation of colon cancer cell lines, but not cells with knockdown of YAP1. Control mice developed colitis after administration of DSS, but injection of PGE2 led to colon regeneration in these mice. However, YAP-knockout mice did not regenerate colon tissues and died soon after administration of DSS. 15-PGDH-knockout mice regenerated colon tissues more rapidly than control mice after withdrawal of DSS, and had faster recovery of body weight, colon length, and colitis histology scores. These effects were reversed by injection of indomethacin. SAV1 -knockout or 15-PDGH-knockout mice did not develop spontaneous tumors following colitis induction, but SAV1/15-PDGH double knockout mice developed polyps that eventually progressed to carcinoma in situ. Administration of indomethacin to these mice prevented spontaneous tumor formation. Levels of PGE2 correlated with those of YAP levels in human sporadic colorectal tumors and colitis-associated tumors. Conclusion PGE2 signaling increases expression and transcriptional activities of YAP1, leading to increased expression of COX2 and EP4 to activate a positive signaling loop. This pathway promotes proliferation of colon cancer...

Highlights d Dedicated genes govern paligenosis, a conserved cellular regeneration program d DDIT4 first blocks mTORC1, inducing massive autophagy to downscale the cell d p53 activation continues mTORC1 suppression to maintain cell quiescence d IFRD1 suppresses p53 to reinduce mTORC1 and license progression into the cell cycle

EUS-FNB using 22-gauge needle obtains a high yield for the diagnosis of gastric SET ≥2 cm, mostly via core tissue acquisition. Endosonographers should pay careful attention to the adequacy of FNB specimens.

SEMS selection for malignant obstruction of the upper gastrointestinal tract depends on the site of obstruction.

Cumulative incidence of metachronous tumors after ER of HGD was comparable to the incidence after ER of EGC. Surveillance endoscopy can be considered at least for 10 years, with special attention on the lower third of the stomach.

The evolution of cancer cells is believed to be dependent on genetic or epigenetic alterations. However, this concept has recently been challenged by another mode of nucleotide alteration, RNA editing, which is frequently up-regulated in cancer. RNA editing is a biochemical process in which either Adenosine or Cytosine is deaminated by a group of RNA editing enzymes including ADAR (Adenosine deaminase; RNA specific) or APOBEC3B (Apolipoprotein B mRNA Editing Enzyme Catalytic Subunit 3B). The result of RNA editing is usually adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) or cytidine to uridine (C-to-U) transition, which can affect protein coding, RNA stability, splicing and microRNA-target interactions. The functional impact of these alterations is largely unclear and is a subject of extensive research. In the present review, we will specifically focus on the influence of ADARs on carcinogenesis via the regulation of microRNA processing and functioning. This follows a brief review of the current knowledge of properties of ADAR enzyme, RNA editing, and microRNA processing.

ADAR1 regulates post-transcriptional gene expression in gastric cancer through both RNA editing-dependent and editing-independent mechanisms.