Melanoma lines MEL.A and MEL.B were derived from metastases removed from patient LB33 in 1988 and 1993, respectively. The MEL.A cells express several antigens recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL) on HLA class I molecules. The MEL.B cells have lost expression of all class I molecules except for HLA-A24. By stimulating autologous lymphocytes with MEL.B, we obtained an HLA-A24-restricted CTL clone that lysed these cells. A novel gene, PRAME, encodes the antigen. It is expressed in a large proportion of tumors and also in some normal tissues, albeit at a lower level. Surprisingly, the CTL failed to lyse MEL.A, even though these cells expressed the gene PRAME. The CTL expresses an NK inhibitory receptor that inhibits its lytic activity upon interaction with HLA-Cw7 molecules, which are present on MEL.A cells and not on MEL.B. Such CTL, active against tumor cells showing partial HLA loss, may constitute an intermediate line of anti-tumor defense between the CTL, which recognize highly specific tumor antigens, and the NK cells, which recognize HLA loss variants.

A subset of male germ line-specific genes, the MAGE-type genes, are activated in many human tumors, where they produce tumor-specific antigens recognized by cytolytic T lymphocytes. Previous studies on gene MAGE-A1 indicated that transcription factors regulating its expression are present in all tumor cell lines whether or not they express the gene. The analysis of two CpG sites located in the promoter showed a strong correlation between expression and demethylation. It was also shown that MAGE-A1 transcription was induced in cell cultures treated with demethylating agent 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine. We have now analyzed all of the CpG sites within the 5 region of MAGE-A1 and show that for all of them, demethylation correlates with the transcription of the gene. We also show that the induction of MAGE-A1 with 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine is stable and that in all the cell clones it correlates with demethylation, indicating that demethylation is necessary and sufficient to produce expression. Conversely, transfection experiments with in vitro-methylated MAGE-A1 sequences indicated that heavy methylation suffices to stably repress the gene in cells containing the transcription factors required for expression. Most MAGE-type genes were found to have promoters with a high CpG content. Remarkably, although CpG-rich promoters are classically unmethylated in all normal tissues, those of MAGE-A1 and LAGE-1 were highly methylated in somatic tissues. In contrast, they were largely unmethylated in male germ cells. We conclude that MAGE-type genes belong to a unique subset of germ line-specific genes that use DNA methylation as a primary silencing mechanism.

We reported previously that human gene MAGE-1 directs the expression of a tumor antigen recognized on a melanoma by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes. Probing cosmid libraries with a MAGE-1 sequence, we identified 11 closely related genes. The analysis of hamster-human somatic cell hybrids indicated that the 12 MAGE genes are located in the q terminal region of chromosome X. Like MAGE-1, the 11 additional MAGE genes have their entire coding sequence located in the last exon, which shows 64%-85% identity with that of MAGE-1. The coding sequences of the MAGE genes predict the same main structural features for all MAGE proteins. In contrast, the promoters and first exons of the 12 MAGE genes show considerable variability, suggesting that the existence of this gene family enables the same function to be expressed under different transcriptional controls. The expression of each MAGE gene was evaluated by reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction amplification. Six genes of the MAGE family including MAGE-1 were found to be expressed at a high level in a number of tumors of various histological types. None was expressed in a large panel of healthy tissues, with the exception of testis and placenta.

Human gene MAGE-1 encodes tumorspecific antigens that are recognized on melanoma cells by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes. This gene is expressed in a significant proportion of tumors of various histological types, but not in normal tissues except male germ-line cells. We reported previously that reporter genes driven by the MAGE-1 promoter are active not only in the tumor cell lines that express MAGE-1 but also in those that do not. This suggests that the critical factor causing the activation of MAGE-1 in certain tumors is not the presence of the appropriate transcription factors. The two major MAGE-1 promoter elements have an Ets binding site, which contains a CpG dinucleotide. We report here that these CpG are demethylated in the tumor cell lines that express MAGE-1, and are methylated in those that do not express the gene. Methylation of these CpG inhibits the binding of transcription factors, as seen by mobility shift assay. Treatment with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine activated gene MAGE-1 not only in tumor cell lines but also in primary fibroblasts. Finally, the overall level of CpG methylation was evaluated in 20 different tumor cell lines. It was inversely correlated with the expression of MAGE-I. We conclude that the activation of MAGE-1 in cancer cells is due to the demethylation of the promoter. This appears to be a consequence of a genome-wide demethylation process that occurs in many cancers and is correlated with tumor progression.

The Myc transcription factor is an essential mediator of cell growth and proliferation through its ability to both positively and negatively regulate transcription. The mechanisms by which Myc silences gene expression are not well understood. The current model is that Myc represses transcription through functional interference with transcriptional activators. Here we show that Myc binds the corepressor Dnmt3a and associates with DNA methyltransferase activity in vivo. In cells with reduced Dnmt3a levels, we observe specific reactivation of the Myc-repressed p21Cip1 gene, whereas the expression of Myc-activated E-boxes genes is unchanged. In addition, we find that Myc can target Dnmt3a selectively to the promoter of p21Cip1. Myc is known to be recruited to the p21Cip1 promoter by the DNA-binding factor Miz-1. Consistent with this, we observe that Myc and Dnmt3a form a ternary complex with Miz-1 and that this complex can corepress the p21Cip1 promoter. Finally, we show that DNA methylation is required for Myc-mediated repression of p21Cip1. Our data identify a new mechanism by which Myc can silence gene expression not only by passive functional interference but also by active recruitment of corepressor proteins. Furthermore, these findings suggest that targeting of DNA methyltransferases by transcription factors is a wide and general mechanism for the generation of specific DNA methylation patterns within a cell.

Representational difference analysis was used to identify genes that are expressed in a human melanoma cell line and not in normal skin. A cDNA clone that appeared to be specific for tumors was obtained and the corresponding gene was sequenced. This new gene was named LAGE‐1. Using a LAGE‐1 probe to screen a cDNA library from the same melanoma cell line, we identified a closely related gene, which proved to be identical to NY‐ESO‐1, a gene recently reported to code for an antigen recognized by autologous antibodies in an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gene LAGE‐1 maps to Xq28. It comprises 3 exons. Alternative splicing produces 2 major transcripts encoding polypeptides of 210 and 180 residues, respectively. Expression of LAGE‐1 was observed in 25–50% of tumor samples of melanomas, non‐small‐cell lung carcinomas, bladder, prostate and head and neck cancers. The only normal tissue that expressed the gene was testis. As for MAGE‐A1, expression of LAGE‐1 is induced by deoxy‐azacytidine in lymphoblastoid cells, suggesting that tumoral expression is due to demethylation. The expression of LAGE‐1 is strongly correlated with that of NY‐ESO‐1. It is also clearly correlated with the expression of MAGE genes. Int. J. Cancer 76:903–908, 1998.© 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Several male germ line-specific genes, including MAGE-A1, rely on DNA methylation for their repression in normal somatic tissues. These genes become activated in many types of tumors in the course of the genomewide demethylation process which often accompanies tumorigenesis. We show that in tumor cells expressing MAGE-A1, the 5 region is significantly less methylated than the other parts of the gene. The process leading to this site-specific hypomethylation does not appear to be permanent in these tumor cells, since in vitromethylated MAGE-A1 sequences do not undergo demethylation after being stably transfected. However, in these cells there is a process that inhibits de novo methylation within the 5 region of MAGE-A1, since unmethylated MAGE-A1 transgenes undergo remethylation at all CpGs except those located within the 5 region. This local inhibition of methylation appears to depend on promoter activity. We conclude that the site-specific hypomethylation of MAGE-A1 in tumor cells relies on a transient process of demethylation followed by a persistent local inhibition of remethylation due to the presence of transcription factors.Cytosines in CpG sequences are often methylated in mammalian genomes. This heritable modification of the DNA contributes to gene silencing by preventing the binding of activating transcription factors and by attracting repressor complexes that induce the formation of inactive chromatin structures (3). The repressive role of DNA methylation has been clearly demonstrated in such processes as the inactivation of one of the two X chromosomes in female somatic cells and the monoallelic silencing of parentally imprinted genes (20, 37). The establishment and the maintenance of specific genome methylation patterns are essential for the appropriate pattern of gene expression in the different cell types (24). Lineage-specific DNA methylation patterns appear to be established during embryonic development by a process that involves an early phase of extensive demethylation followed by active de novo methylation (26,33). The mechanisms directing the methylation to certain regions of the genome and not to others is still unclear. The unmethylated status of certain regions has been ascribed to their association with active promoters (9,31

No abstract