We have investigated the effect of placing phosphoserine at the N-cap, N1, N2, N3, and interior position in alanine-based alpha-helical peptides. Helix contents of each peptide were measured by CD spectroscopy and titrations performed to determine pK(a) values. Data were analyzed with modified Lifson-Roig theory to determine helix-coil parameters (n, n(1), n(2), n(3), and w) and free energy changes for phosphoserine at each helical position. Results are given for a -1 and -2 phosphoserine charge state. Results show that phosphoserine stabilizes at the N-terminal positions by as much as 2.3 kcal.mol(-1), while destabilizes in the helix interior by 1.2 kcal.mol(-1), relative to serine. The rank order of free energies relative to serine at each position is N2 > N3 > N1 > N-cap > interior. Moreover, -2 phosphoserine is the most preferred residue known at each of these N-terminal positions. Experimental pK(a) values for the -1 to -2 phosphoserine transition are in the order N2 < N-cap < N1 < N3 < interior. This order agrees well with electrostatics calculations carried out with phosphoserine at the N-terminal positions and interior positions. Combining these with calculations at the C3, C2, C1, and C-cap positions gives results for phosphoserine along the length of the helix. We see a transition from phosphoserine stabilization at the N-terminus to destabilization at the C-terminus and can explain this in terms of the balance of protein solvation, favorable interactions, and dehydration. These results give insight into the phosphorylatable control of biological systems through positive or negative changes in stability.

Here we investigate the structures and energetics of interactions between aromatic (Phe or Tyr) and basic (Lys or Arg) amino acids in alpha-helices. Side chain interaction energies are measured using helical peptides, by quantifying their helicities with circular dichroism at 222 nm and interpreting the results with Lifson-Roig-based helix/coil theory. A difficulty in working with Tyr is that the aromatic ring perturbs the CD spectrum, giving an incorrect helicity. We calculated the effect of Tyr on the CD at 222 nm by deriving the intensities of the bands directly from the electronic and magnetic transition dipole moments through the rotational strengths corresponding to each excited state of the polypeptide. This gives an improved value of the helix preference of Tyr (from 0.48 to 0.35) and a correction to the helicity for the peptides containing Tyr. We find that Phe-Lys, Lys-Phe, Phe-Arg, Arg-Phe, and Tyr-Lys are all stabilizing by -0.10 to -0.18 kcal.mol-1 when placed i, i + 4 on the surface of a helix in aqueous solution, despite the great difference in polarity between these residues. Interactions between these side chains have previously been attributed to cation-pi bonds. A survey of protein structures shows that they are in fact predominantly hydrophobic interactions between the CH2 groups of Lys or Arg and the aromatic rings.

A simplistic, yet often used, view of protein stability is that amino acids attract other amino acids with similar polarity, whereas nonpolar and polar side chains repel. Here we show that nonpolar/polar interactions, namely Val or Ile bonding to Lys or Arg in alpha-helices, can in fact be stabilizing. Residues spaced i, i + 4 in alpha-helices are on the same face of the helix, with potential to favorably interact and stabilize the structure. We observe that the nonpolar/polar pairs Ile-Lys, Ile-Arg, and Val-Lys occur in protein helices more often than expected when spaced i, i + 4. Partially helical peptides containing pairs of nonpolar/polar residues were synthesized. Controls with i, i + 5 spacing have the residues on opposite faces of the helix and are less helical than the test peptides with the i, i + 4 interactions. Experimental circular dichroism results were analyzed with helix-coil theory to calculate the free energy for the interactions. All three stabilize the helix with DeltaG between -0.14 and -0.32 kcal x mol(-1). The interactions are hydrophobic with contacts between Val or Ile and the alkyl groups in Arg or Lys. Side chains such as Lys and Arg can thus interact favorably with both polar and nonpolar residues.

Pauling first described the α-helix nearly 50 years ago, yet new features of its structure continue to be discovered, using peptide model systems, site-directed mutagenesis, advances in theory, the expansion of the Protein Data Bank and new experimental techniques. Helical peptides in solution form a vast number of structures, including fully helical, fully coiled and partly helical. To interpret peptide results quantitatively it is essential to use a helix/coil model that includes the stabilities of all these conformations. Our models now include terms for helix interiors, capping, side-chain interactions, N-termini and 310-helices. The first three amino acids in a helix (N1, N2 and N3) and the preceding N-cap are unique, as their amide NH groups do not participate in backbone hydrogen bonding. We surveyed their structures in proteins and measured their amino acid preferences. The results are predominantly rationalized by hydrogen bonding to the free NH groups. Stabilizing side-chain-side-chain energies, including hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding and polar/non-polar interactions, were measured accurately in helical peptides. Helices in proteins show a preference for having approximately an integral number of turns so that their N- and C-caps lie on the same side. There are also strong periodic trends in the likelihood of terminating a helix with a Schellman or αL C-cap motif. The kinetics of α-helix folding have been studied with stopped-flow deep ultraviolet circular dichroism using synchrotron radiation as the light source; this gives a far superior signal-to-noise ratio than a conventional instrument. We find that poly(Glu), poly(Lys) and alanine-based peptides fold in milliseconds, with longer peptides showing a transient overshoot in helix content.