that it will do so is firmly implanted in his mind.Physical therapy will never restore function to a part. At this stage it is of value only as an adjuvant, and then only if physician, physical therapist and patient under¬ stand it as such. Here lies the peculiar difficulty in the care of fractures. If a man has an acute appendicitis one operates on him and removes his appendix. With the clearing up of the pathologic process he gets well. As a personality he plays relatively little part in the story. In a man who has had a fracture, however, one may achieve a perfect anatomic result and solid bony healing, check all pathologic changes and demonstrate perfect passive function, but if he does not use the part as it was used before the injury all the work has been in vain. The regaining of function is the patient's job, and once he is given the erroneous idea that the phy¬ sician can regain it for him, the groundwork is laid for prolonged convalescence and impaired end-results. I cannot emphasize this point too strongly. One can make the patient's efforts to regain function more com¬ fortable, one can ease the spasm and pain resultant on overuse and one can aid the circulatory status of the part, but one cannot restore function or circulatory efficiency by physical therapy without normal muscular activity. Active motion within pain limits is the means of regaining function : guided active motion ; gently resisted active motion ; active motion with the patient's mind concentrated on some useful, purposeful aim, rather than on the actual motion that he is making. This is much better than aimless exercises. Passive motion is a confession of inability to secure active motion. It may infrequently be necessary, but its use is always deplorable. Its use in children may be regarded as a calamity.One may use what physical therapy one will, then, in the late stages, but it must be understood that the patient is not regaining function by it ; one is merely making it easier for him to carry out his job. The only reservation that I should make as to the forms of physical therapy to be employed is that they must cause neither pain nor muscle spasm and that heat must be used in low intensity and for a prolonged time. Anything that makes it easier for the patient actively to exercise function is good physical therapy if he under¬ stands that its sole value to him lies in that help. If he sits by and does nothing but receive physical therapythree times a week for fifteen minutes or half an hour, as thousands of them do every day, his dependence on physical therapy is doing him harm. I believe that it is just as much the physical therapist's as it is the physician's part to implant in the patient's mind the proper valua¬ tion of late physical therapy in treatment of fracture. In a way, I feel that it is the physical therapist's job to help educate the physician, who is prone to treat his patients after the splints are off by simply sending them for physical therapy at intervals, as to the real intrinsic value of early physical therap...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.