Wheat powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici) and stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis Westend f. sp. tritici) restrict wheat production in southwest China. Nitrogen fertilizers may influence outbreaks of these wheat diseases where wheat/faba beans are intercropped. To clarify how intercropping and varying nitrogen levels influence wheat powdery mildew and stripe rust and their relationship with crop yield, two consecutive field experiments were conducted from 2015 to 2017. Three cropping regimens (monocropped wheat, monocropped faba beans, and intercropped wheat/faba beans) and four nitrogen levels [N0 (0 kg⋅ha–1), N1 (90 kg⋅ha–1), N2 (180 kg⋅ha–1), and N3 (270 kg⋅ha–1)] were evaluated. In two consecutive planting seasons, the incidence and disease index of powdery mildew and stripe rust increased, while the disease index was more affected by nitrogen levels than their incidence. Both diseases were most prevalent at the N3 level. Compared with monocropping, intercropping (N0–N3 levels) reduced the incidence of powdery mildew by 2.8–37.0% and disease index by 15.5–47.4%, increased the relative control effect by 10.7–56.2 and 16.3–47.2%, reduced the incidence of stripe rust by 2.9–42.7% and disease index by 8.3–42.2%, and increased the relative control effect by 5.9–43.7 and 8.8–42.1%. The relative control efficacy of intercropping was most affected by N2 level. Intercropping yield increased with increasing nitrogen by 25.0–46.8%, and overall land equivalent ratio (LER) was 1.30–1.39. The correlation coefficient between disease index and wheat yield for both diseases was −0.7429 to −0.9942, a significant negative correlation, most significant at N1. Nitrogen regulation in intercropped wheat/faba beans can control powdery mildew and stripe rust, and optimize wheat yield. Intercropping at 180 kg ha–1 N2 resulted in the highest yield.
Changes in the light environment have an important effect on crop growth and yield. To clarify the effects of intercropping and the application of nitrogen on the yield of wheat and light within the crop canopy, the relationship between light and yield and their response to nitrogen fertilizer were studied. In a 2-year field experiment, the characteristics of growth, light, biomass, and yield of wheat were measured using three cropping arrangements (monocropped wheat, monocropped faba beans, and intercropped wheat/faba beans) and four levels of applied nitrogen, in groups termed N0 (0 kg/ha), N1 (90 kg/ha), N2 (180 kg/ha), and N3 (270 kg/ha). The results demonstrated that the application of nitrogen fertilizer increased wheat plant height, spike leaf length and width, and the number of leaves while significantly decreasing wheat canopy light transmittance (LT) and canopy photosynthetic active radiation transmittance (PART), by 7.5–71.1 and 12.7–75.1%, respectively. There was a significantly increased canopy photosynthetic active radiation interception rate (IPAR) of 7.5–97.8% and an increase in biomass of 9.6–38.4%, of which IPAR, biomass, and yield were highest at the N2 level. Compared with monocropping, intercropping increased parameters of wheat growth to varying degrees. Intercropping decreased LT and PART by 10.8–46.4 and 15.7–58.7%, respectively, but increased IPAR by 0.1–66.0%, wheat biomass and yield by 7.5–17.4 and 27.7–47.2%, respectively. The mean yield of intercropped wheat increased by 35.8% over 2 years, while the mean land equivalent ratio (LER) was 1.36, for which a values greater than 1 indicates that wheat and faba bean intercropping is advantageous. Correlation analysis demonstrated that there was a very significant negative correlation between wheat LT and yield, while simultaneously demonstrating a very significant positive correlation between PART and IPAR with yield, indicating that the efficient interception and utilization of light energy in intercropping was the basis for the higher biomass and yield of wheat. In summary, wheat/faba bean intercropping and the application of nitrogen at 180 kg/ha were effective in increasing wheat yield.
While intercropping can help control faba bean rust, the ability of intercropping to reduce this disease under different levels of nitrogen fertilization and its contribution to increasing yield is not clear. In this study, two planting patterns of faba bean monocropping and wheat/faba bean intercropping, together with two treatments for disease control (DC) and non-control (NC), and four nitrogen application levels [N0 (0 kg/ha), N1 (45 kg/ha), N2 (90 kg/ha), and N3 (135 kg/ha)] were tested for two years in a continuous field experiment. The results revealed that nitrogen application increased the area under the progress curve (AUDPC) of faba bean rust from 41.9% to 47.3%, with the N3 treatment resulting in the largest increase. Nitrogen application decreased the relative control efficacy (RCE) of intercropping on faba bean rust. Compared with monocropping, N0 to N3 with intercropping significantly reduced AUDPC by 33.1% for the first year and 28.7% for the second year (P<0.05). Nitrogen application aggravated the faba beans grain yield loss, while the loss of yield components increased in the first year and then declined as the nitrogen application increased, and the yield losses of monocropping were higher than those of intercropping. The N1 and N2 application levels significantly increased the total effect (TE) of intercropping yield advantage by 34.3% and 32.9% in the two years, respectively. During the two years, the overall partial land equivalent ratio (pLER) of faba bean was greater than 0.33. The average disease control effect (DCE)/TE of intercropping was 56.1% and 49.3% for the two years, respectively, indicating that intercropping increased yields and that the contribution of the DCE was close to or higher than that of the other intercropping effects. A regression analysis of the grain yield loss and the AUDPC showed that reducing the nitrogen fertilizer input (N1) could effectively reduce the yield loss caused by rust and enhance the yield. Intercropping of faba bean combined with a suitable nitrogen application (45 kg/ha) is the best treatment to maximize yield by fully utilizing intercropping for managing faba bean rust.
Effects of nitrogen fertilization on the accumulation and distribution of biomass and plant nitrogen content in intercropped faba beans, together with its impact on the interspecific interactions between faba bean and wheat has not been well studied. Here, we have used a logistic model to analyze the cropping systems (i.e., monocropped faba bean, monocropped wheat, and faba bean intercropped with wheat) by evaluating the effects of different levels of nitrogen application on the dynamic changes in biomass and nitrogen accumulation, along with the interspecific interaction. Using monocropped and intercropped faba beans in field experiments spanning two years, we found that nitrogen application increased both monocropped and intercropped faba bean yields. The yield of intercropped faba beans was greatest at the lower nitrogen input for two consecutive years. Nitrogen application increased the biomass and nitrogen accumulation in both monocropped and intercropped faba beans. The simulation parameters that increased were maximum nitrogen accumulation (A') and maximum accumulation rate (R' max ) while the initial cumulative rate (r') decreased. Compared with monocropping, intercropped faba bean-wheat showed increased yield and biomass accumulation, along with a significantly increased initial growth rate (r) and a maximum instantaneous growth rate (R max ). Intercropping reduced stem and leaf biomass and the nitrogen distribution ratio while increasing the pod content. In the early intercropped faba bean growth stage, there was no competition for nutrients or any kind of yield advantage, while in the later stages, the nutrient competitiveness of intercropping was stronger than the intraspecific competition, showing the advantages of intercropping on biomass and yield (i.e., relative
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.