Medical students are at elevated risk for mental health difficulties and may struggle to ask for help. Innovative outreach programs are warranted to reduce barriers and ensure that students receive the professional care they need and deserve. This article provides a 6-year retrospective of the Keck Checks program, a well-established initiative that offered universal 15-minute mental health screenings to every first-year medical student at the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California from fall 2016 to fall 2022. This early detection program was designed to combat barriers to seeking mental health care by normalizing the concept of all students meeting with a psychologist early in their academic careers. The Keck Checks program showed promising feasibility, with a single full-time clinician successfully hosting appointments for entire classes of first-year medical students (mean of 189 students per class) during approximately 4 months, in addition to other work duties. Participation rates were high, with 715 eligible students (76.3%) choosing to attend their Keck Check. Students were frequently referred to follow-up services during the Keck Check, including mental health care (n = 360 [50.4%] referred), occupational therapy (n = 72 [10.1%] referred), and academic support services (n = 60 [8.4%] referred). Next steps include possible expansion of similar programs to medical students in years 2 to 4, residents, and physicians, as well as understanding the effect of brief mental health screenings on long-term help-seeking, adherence to mental health treatment plans, and general educational or professional success. Brief, universal mental health screenings are a relatively low-cost, high-impact approach for medical schools to consider in supporting the mental health of their student body.
The Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) requires that well-being programs must be "effective." Yet most medical schools do not robustly assess their wellbeing programs. Most evaluate their programs using one question on the Association of American Medical College's annual Graduation Questionnaire (AAMC GQ) survey for fourth-year students on their satisfaction with well-being programs, which is inadequate and nonspecific and only assesses a specific time in training. In this perspective, we, as members of the AAMC Group on Student Affairs (GSA) -Committee on Student Affairs (COSA) Working Group on Medical Student Well-being, suggest adapting Kern's 6-step approach to curriculum development as an effective framework to guide the development and evaluation of well-being programs. We suggest strategies for applying Kern's steps to well-being programs, with attention to conducting needs assessments, identifying goals, implementation, and evaluation and feedback. While each institution will have unique goals emerging from their needs assessment, we put forth five common medical student well-being goals as examples. Applying a rigorous and structured approach to developing and evaluating undergraduate medical education well-being programs will involve defining a guiding philosophy and clear goals and implementing a strong assessment strategy. This Kern-based framework can help schools meaningfully assess the impact of their initiatives on student well-being.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.