No abstract

BackgroundTo determine if tibial positioning affects the external rotation of the tibia in a dial test for posterolateral rotatory instability combined with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries.MethodsBetween April 2007 and October 2007, 16 patients with a PCL tear and posterolateral rotatory instability were diagnosed using a dial test. The thigh-foot angle was measured at both 30° and 90° of knee flexion with an external rotation stress applied to the tibia in 2 different positions (reduction and posterior subluxation). The measurements were performed twice by 2 orthopedic surgeons.ResultsIn posterior subluxation, the mean side-to-side difference in the thigh-foot angle was 11.56 ± 3.01° at 30° of knee flexion and 11.88 ± 4.03° at 90° of knee flexion. In the sequential dial test performed with the tibia reduced, the mean side-to-side difference was 15.94 ± 4.17° (p < 0.05) at 30° of knee flexion and 16.88 ± 4.42° (p = 0.001) at 90° of knee flexion. The mean tibial external rotation was 5.31 ± 2.86° and 6.87 ± 3.59° higher in the reduced position than in the posterior subluxation at both 30° and 90° of knee flexion.ConclusionsIn the dial test, reducing the tibia with an anterior force increases the ability of an examiner to detect posterolateral rotary instability of the knee combined with PCL injuries.

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Purpose:To compare the clinical efficacy after an arthroscopic ACL double-bundle reconstruction with and without functional knee brace. Materials and Methods: Between July 2004 and May 2006, fifty patients who underwent an ACL double-bundle reconstruction with and without a functional knee brace for more than a 1-year follow-up were evaluated. The patients were treated with brace (Group 1, 22 cases) or without (Group 2, 28 cases) a brace after surgrey. Stability was assessed by maximal manual testing with a KT-1000 arthrometer, anterior stress radiographs using the Telos device and a lateral pivot shift test. The clinical results were assessed by the OAK (Orthopadische Arbeitsgruppe Knie) score, IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) score, mid thigh circumference and the range of motion. Results: More than one year after surgery, average of OAK score, IKDC score, lateral pivot shift test of the stability results and maximal manual testing with the KT-1000 arthrometer, stress radiographs with the Telos device, mid thigh circumference difference, range of motion of the clinical results were similar in both groups. Conclusion: An ACL double-bundle reconstruction produces similar stability and clinical results regardlness of whether or not a functional knee brace is used.