BACKGROUND: Current hemophilia treatment involves frequent intravenous infusions of clotting factors, which is associated with variable hemostatic protection, a high treatment burden, and a risk of the development of inhibitory alloantibodies. Fitusiran, an investigational RNA interference (RNAi) therapy that targets antithrombin (encoded by SERPINC1), is in development to address these and other limitations. METHODS: In this phase 1 dose-escalation study, we enrolled 4 healthy volunteers and 25 participants with moderate or severe hemophilia A or B who did not have inhibitory alloantibodies. Healthy volunteers received a single subcutaneous injection of fitusiran (at a dose of 0.03 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo. The participants with hemophilia received three injections of fitusiran administered either once weekly (at a dose of 0.015, 0.045, or 0.075 mg per kilogram) or once monthly (at a dose of 0.225, 0.45, 0.9, or 1.8 mg per kilogram or a fixed dose of 80 mg). The study objectives were to assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and safety of fitusiran. RESULTS: No thromboembolic events were observed during the study. The most common adverse events were mild injection-site reactions. Plasma levels of fitusiran increased in a dose-dependent manner and showed no accumulation with repeated administration. The monthly regimen induced a dose-dependent mean maximum antithrombin reduction of 70 to 89% from baseline. A reduction in the antithrombin level of more than 75% from baseline resulted in median peak thrombin values at the lower end of the range observed in healthy participants. CONCLUSIONS: Once-monthly subcutaneous administration of fitusiran resulted in dose-dependent lowering of the antithrombin level and increased thrombin generation in participants with hemophilia A or B who did not have inhibitory alloantibodies. ( BACKGROUNDCurrent hemophilia treatment involves frequent intravenous infusions of clotting factors, which is associated with variable hemostatic protection, a high treatment burden, and a risk of the development of inhibitory alloantibodies. Fitusiran, an investigational RNA interference (RNAi) therapy that targets antithrombin (encoded by SERPINC1), is in development to address these and other limitations.

Summary Background Bevacizumab and erlotinib target different tumour growth pathways with little overlap in their toxic-effect profiles. On the basis of promising results from a phase 1/2 trial assessing safety and activity of erlotinib plus bevacizumab for recurrent or refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we aimed to assess efficacy and safety of this combination in a phase 3 trial. Methods In our double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 3 trial (BeTa), we enrolled patients with recurrent or refractory NSCLC who presented to 177 study sites in 12 countries after failure of first-line treatment. Patients were randomly allocated in a one-to-one ratio to receive erlotinib plus bevacizumab (bevacizumab group) or erlotinib plus placebo (control group) according to a computer-generated randomisation sequence by use of an interactive voice response system. The primary endpoint was overall survival in all enrolled patients. Patients, study staff, and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. We assessed safety by calculation of incidence of adverse events and tissue was collected for biomarker analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00130728. Findings Overall survival did not differ between 317 controls and 319 patients in the bevacizumab group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·97, 95% CI 0·80–1·18, p=0·7583). Median overall survival was 9·3 months (IQR 4·1–21·6) for patients in the bevacizumab group compared with 9·2 months (3·8–20·2) for controls. Progression-free survival seemed to be longer in the bevacizumab group (3·4 months [1·4–8·4]) than in the control group (1·7 months [1·3–4·1]; HR 0·62, 95% CI 0·52–0·75) and objective response rate suggested some clinical activity of bevacizumab and erlotinib. However, these secondary endpoint differences could not be defined as significant because the study prespecified that the primary endpoint had to be significant before testing of secondary endpoints could be done, to control type I error rate. In the bevacizumab group, 130 (42%) of 313 patients with safety data had a serious adverse event, compared with 114 (36%) controls. There were 20 (6%) grade 5 adverse events, including two arterial thromboembolic events, in the bevacizumab group, and 14 (4%) in the control group. Interpretation Addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib does not improve survival in patients with recurrent or refractory NSCLC. Funding Genentech.

No abstract

We studied the reliability and validity of the Chinese Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) in a cross sectional study of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Sixty-nine consecutive subjects completed a questionnaire containing the Chinese SF-36 twice within 14 d. Disease activity and damage were assessed using the British Isles Lupus Activity Group (BILAG) and SLICC/ACR Damage Index (DI) scales, respectively. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, reliability using Spearman's correlation and repeatability coefficients, and relationships between SF-36, BILAG and DI scores using Spearman's correlation. The Chinese SF-36 showed high internal consistency (alpha = 0.72-0.91) and good reliability, with correlations exceeding 0.70 for 7 scales and mean scale score differences of < 2 points for 6 scales. SF-36 scores correlated weakly with BILAG scores (-0.27 to -0.41) and DI scores (-0.24 to -0.35), and subjects' mean SF-36 scores were 6-24 points lower than the general population, supporting construct validity of the SP-36. These data suggest that the Chinese SF-36 is a reliable and valid measure of quality of life in patients with SLE.

LBA8002 Background: B when added to chemotherapy, and E alone, each lead to improved survival in the treatment of patients (pts) with NSCLC (Sandler et al, NEJM 2006, 355:2542–2550; Shepherd et al, NEJM 2005, 353:123–132). Pre-clinical and clinical data (Herbst, J Clin Oncol 2007, 25: 4743–4750) suggest that the combination of B and E may improve the efficacy of NSCLC treatment. This potential was demonstrated in the BETA (B in combination with E compared with E alone for treatment of advanced NSCLC after failure of standard first-line chemotherapy) trial, a phase III trial in which progression free survival (PFS) was improved for patients treated with B + E (Hainsworth, Thoracic Oncol 2008, 3(11) Supp. 4:S302). Methods: The ATLAS study was designed to evaluate B + E (150 mg daily) versus B alone, following B + platin-containing doublet chemotherapy, in pts with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC. Enrolled pts were B-eligible, including pts with treated brain metastases, and pts anticoagulated with low molecular weight heparin(s). Pts with peripheral and/or extra-thoracic squamous tumors were also eligible. Pts received 4 cycles of B (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) with chemotherapy. Pts who had not experienced disease progression (DP) or significant toxicity were then randomized to receive B + E or B + placebo (P). The primary objective of ATLAS was to compare PFS in pts receiving B + E versus B + placebo. Secondary objectives included the assessment of safety, and overall survival. A data safety monitoring committee (DSMC) monitored safety and efficacy. Results: 1,160 patients were enrolled and 768 randomized from May 2005 to May 2008. The DSMC recommended stopping the trial at the second planned interim efficacy analysis, because it met the primary endpoint. The median PFS after randomization was 4.8 mos for (B + E) vs. 3.7 mos for (B + P), HR= 0.722 (95% CI: 0.592–0.881), p = 0.0012. The safety profile for B + E was consistent with known profiles for B and E. Conclusions: E added to B treatment after chemotherapy with B significantly improves the PFS of patients treated in the first-line setting for locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic NSCLC. [Table: see text]

The WOMAC is a valid and reliable outcome measure in Asian patients with OA in Singapore.

No abstract

No abstract