Primary spontaneous colporrhexis is rare a condition characterised by rupture of the upper one third of the vaginal wall without extension from uterus or cervix in a parous women with an unscarred uterus. In our case the colporrhexis was also a complete one with rupture of the entire vaginal wall layers.A 31-year old, second gravida was booked in our hospital at 36 wks of gestation. She had no comorbities. She had previous full term normal vaginal delivery of an alive baby weighing 2.75kg.At 39 weeks and 4 days gestation she was admitted for induction of labour as she had borderline liquor. Induction was done with 2 doses of misoprostol 25mcg kept vaginally 4 hrs apart. 2 hours after placing the 2ndmisoprost she had spontaneous rupture of membranes with clear liquor draining PV. With strong uterine contractions. She delivered within 45 minutes a live healthy baby of 3kg weight. Placenta was delivered by AMTSL. Bleeding per vagina was within normal limits. During visualization of cervix and vagina prior to closure of episiotomy, omentum was seen coming out of upper part of posterior fornix of vagina. An irregular transverse rent was found and felt behind the cervix. Cervix was intact Uterus had contracted well. There was no excessive bleeding from vagina. Patients vitals were stable. Vagina was immediately packed and patient was shifted to OT after explaining about the unexpected complication and obtaining informed consent from patient and her relatives. Under anaesthesia, Visualisation of cervix and Examination of uterus was done. They were found to be intact. No extension of episiotomy seen. There was a transverse tear of 5 cm involving the posterior fornix. The left edge of the tear was found to be extending slightly upwards for about 2 cm. Omentum was seen protruding through the rent. The edges were dilineated, omentum was pushed inside. The delineated edges of the rent were sutured with 1-0 vicryl with intermittent sutures in two layers. Complete hemostasis was ensured.
Background: The post-partum period is challenging enough for most new mothers. Recovering from birth, learning to parent, and taking care of her child requires lot of energy. Having anemia in postpartum period can make this process much more difficult. According to WHO, in India incidence of anemia in postnatal mother is around 58% and according to ICMR prevalence of anemia in Tamil Nadu population 76% during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of intravenous iron supplementation with Iron sucrose to the oral supplementation with ferrous ascorbate in management of patient with post-partum anemia. To study the safety and side effects of these two preparations.Methods: This was a prospective study conducted on 100 post-partum anemic women in KG Hospital in Coimbatore, October 2012 to November 2013 with hemoglobin less than 10g/dl but more than 6g/dl within 24-48 hours of delivery ,after satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study.Results: Mean hemoglobin of oral group was 8.49±0.75 and mean hemoglobin of IV group was 8.43±0.76; 24 hours after delivery. After treatment, that is after 4 weeks mean hemoglobin of oral group was 10.38±0.79 and mean hemoglobin of IV group was 11.20±0.71.on comparing both groups, the increase in hemoglobin in the IV groups was significant. Reticulocyte count and other parameters increased significantly after four wks of starting therapy in IV group compare to the oral group. No major side effects or anaphylactic reactions were noted during study period.Conclusions: Intravenous iron sucrose complex is safe, convenient and effective in postpartum anemic women as compared with the oral ferrous ascorbate. Intravenous iron sucrose have shorter treatment periods, increased likelihood of compliance, a lack of gastrointestinal side effects, and rapid replenishment of iron stores, making them superior to oral ferrous ascorbate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.