The mechanism of flow separation control was investigated experimentally and computationally using pulse-modulated dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuation on a stalled flat plate airfoil at a Reynolds number of 3000. Load measurements were complimented with two-dimensional phase-averaged particle image velocimetry performed in the flowfield above the airfoil. A parametric study was carried out where the pulse-modulation frequency, duty cycle, and peak plasma body-force were varied. The two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations, with no turbulence modeling, were solved directly using a commercial flow solver and a simple but satisfactory heuristic DBD plasma body-force model was incorporated. The overall experimental trends were well predicted by the computations, where the frequencies that produced the largest increases in lift coefficient excited bluff-body shedding at a frequency corresponding approximately to its unforced sub-harmonic. At non-dimensional frequencies most effective for increasing lift (∼0.2 to 0.5), the leading-edge shear layer was severed by the perturbations and then merged with a downstream vortex. In a time-mean sense this mechanism forced relatively high momentum fluid towards the surface with typically two re-circulating structures present on the airfoil. Although the essential flow control mechanism was captured by the computation, the idealized 2D approach was identified as a weakness due to the shedding instability not being present in the baseline experiments and the inability to account for three-dimensional structures in the shear layer.
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have become a standard therapy for patients with severe heart failure. As low blood trauma in LVADs is important for a good clinical outcome, the assessment of the fluid loads inside the pump is critical. More specifically, the flow features on the surfaces where the interaction between blood and artificial material happens is of great importance. Therefore, experimental data for the near-wall flows in an axial rotary blood pump were collected and directly compared to computational fluid dynamic results. For this, the flow fields based on unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations-computational fluid dynamics (URANS-CFD) of an axial rotary blood pump were calculated and compared with experimental flow data at one typical state of operation in an enlarged model of the pump. The focus was set on the assessment of wall shear stresses (WSS) at the housing wall and rotor gap region by means of the wall-particle image velocimetry technique, and the visualization of near-wall flow structures on the inner pump surfaces by a paint erosion method. Additionally, maximum WSS and tip leakage volume flows were measured for 13 different states of operation. Good agreement between CFD and experimental data was found, which includes the location, magnitude, and direction of the maximum and minimum WSS and the presence of recirculation zones on the pump stators. The maximum WSS increased linearly with pressure head. They occurred at the upstream third of the impeller blades and exceeded the critical values with respect to hemolysis. Regions of very high shear stresses and recirculation zones could be identified and were in good agreement with simulations. URANS-CFD, which is often used for pump performance and blood damage prediction, seems to be, therefore, a valid tool for the assessment of flow fields in axial rotary blood pumps. The magnitude of maximum WSS could be confirmed and were in the order of several hundred Pascal.
It can be concluded that turbulence is indeed present in the investigated blood pump and that it can be described by Kolmogorov's theory of turbulence. The size of the smallest vortices compares well to the turbulence length scales as found in prosthetic heart valves, for example.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.