No abstract

No abstract

SummaryTo evaluate the role of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as an alternative to oral anticoagulants in the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism, we compared in a randomized trial conventional warfarin treatment with a three-month course of enoxaparin 4000 anti-Xa units once a day subcutaneously. 187 patients with symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), diagnosed by strain-gauge plethysmography plus D-dimer latex assay and confirmed by venography in most cases, were treated with full-dose subcutaneous heparin for ten days and then randomized to secondary prophylaxis. During the 3-month treatment period, 6 of the 93 patients who received LMWH (6%) and 4 of the 94 patients on warfarin (4%) had symptomatic recurrence of venous thromboembolism confirmed by objective testing (p = 0.5; 95% confidence interval [Cl] for the difference, -3% to 7%). Four patients in the LMWH group had bleeding complications as compared with 12 in the warfarin group (p = 0.04; 95% Cl for the difference, 4% to 14%). In the 9-month follow-up period, during which 34 patients on warfarin prolonged treatment for other 3 months and 14 up to one year, 10 patients in the enoxaparin group and 4 patients in the warfarin group suffered a documented recurrence of venous thromboembolism. Of these 14 late recurrences, just one occurred in patients with postoperative DVT. After one year there were 16 recurrences (17%) in the LMWH group and 8 (9%) in the warfarin group (p = 0.07; 95% Cl for the difference, 1% to 16%).These results confirm the potential of LMWH as an alternative to oral anticoagulants in this setting, and suggest to evaluate in a prospective study a slightly higher dose of enoxaparin in patients with postoperative DVT.

SummaryThe paper reports on rate and type of thrombotic events occurring during the observational, prospective, inception-cohort, multicenter ISCOAT study. 2,745 unselected, daily practice patients, consecutively referring to 34 Italian anticoagulation clinics to monitor the oral anticoagulant treatment, were included in the study from beginning of their first anticoagulant course. During a total follow-up of 2,011 patient-years of treatment 70 thrombotic events (3.5 per 100 patient years) were recorded in 67 patients: 20 fatal (1%), 39 major (1.9%) and 11 minor (0.6%). 34/70 events occurred within the first 90 days of treatment (relative risk - at multivariate analysis - of <90 days vs. >90 = 20.6, C.I. 12.7-33.5; p <0.0001). The risk was higher in patients aged >70 y (1.62, C.I. 1.0-2.61; p <0.05), and when indication for anticoagulant treatment was peripheral/cerebral arterial disease (1.84, C.I. 1.01-3.36; p <0.05). The frequency of thrombotic events was 17.5% when international normalised ratio (INR) levels were <1.5, decreasing to 2.3% for INRs within the 2-2.99 category (relative risk of INRs <2.0 vs. >2 = 1.88, C.1.1.16-3.07; p <0.05).The recorded rate of thrombotic events was lower than that reported in the few available studies. A greater risk should be expected during the first 90 days of treatment, when anticoagulation levels are <2.0 INR, in patients > 70 years and in those with cerebrovascular/peripheral arterial disease.

At variance with vitamin K antagonists, the new oral anticoagulants(NOAs) can be prescribed at fixed dosage without adjustment by laboratory testing. However, this does not necessarily mean that the laboratory does not play a role for their management. This position paper represents the consensus document of three Italian scientific societies dealing with laboratory issues in thrombosis and hemostasis. It is aimed at reviewing: 1) which test(s) should be used to evaluate the anticoagulant effect of each of the NOAs presently available(i.e., dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban); 2) the patients to be investigated; and 3) the timing of investigation.