Clonally transmissible cancers are somatic cell lineages that are spread between individuals via the transfer of living cancer cells. There are only three known naturally occurring transmissible cancers, and these affect dogs, soft-shell clams, and Tasmanian devils, respectively. The Tasmanian devil transmissible facial cancer was first observed in 1996, and is threatening its host species with extinction. Until now, this disease has been consistently associated with a single aneuploid cancer cell lineage that we refer to as DFT1. Here we describe a second transmissible cancer, DFT2, in five devils located in southern Tasmania in 2014 and 2015. DFT2 causes facial tumors that are grossly indistinguishable but histologically distinct from those caused by DFT1. DFT2 bears no detectable cytogenetic similarity to DFT1 and carries a Y chromosome, which contrasts with the female origin of DFT1. DFT2 shows different alleles to both its hosts and DFT1 at microsatellite, structural variant, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) loci, confirming that it is a second cancer that can be transmitted between devils as an allogeneic, MHC-discordant graft. These findings indicate that Tasmanian devils have spawned at least two distinct transmissible cancer lineages and suggest that transmissible cancers may arise more frequently in nature than previously considered. The discovery of DFT2 presents important challenges for the conservation of Tasmanian devils and raises the possibility that this species is particularly prone to the emergence of transmissible cancers. More generally, our findings highlight the potential for cancer cells to depart from their hosts and become dangerous transmissible pathogens.
Contagious cancers that pass between individuals as an infectious cell line are highly unusual pathogens. Devil facial tumor disease (DFTD) is one such contagious cancer that emerged 16 y ago and is driving the Tasmanian devil to extinction. As both a pathogen and an allograft, DFTD cells should be rejected by the host-immune response, yet DFTD causes 100% mortality among infected devils with no apparent rejection of tumor cells. Why DFTD cells are not rejected has been a question of considerable confusion. Here, we show that DFTD cells do not express cell surface MHC molecules in vitro or in vivo, due to down-regulation of genes essential to the antigen-processing pathway, such as β 2 -microglobulin and transporters associated with antigen processing. Loss of gene expression is not due to structural mutations, but to regulatory changes including epigenetic deacetylation of histones. Consequently, MHC class I molecules can be restored to the surface of DFTD cells in vitro by using recombinant devil IFN-γ, which is associated with up-regulation of the MHC class II transactivator, a key transcription factor with deacetylase activity. Further, expression of MHC class I molecules by DFTD cells can occur in vivo during lymphocyte infiltration. These results explain why T cells do not target DFTD cells. We propose that MHC-positive or epigenetically modified DFTD cells may provide a vaccine to DFTD. In addition, we suggest that down-regulation of MHC molecules using regulatory mechanisms allows evolvability of transmissible cancers and could affect the evolutionary trajectory of DFTD.
The Tasmanian devil, a marsupial carnivore, is endangered because of the emergence of a transmissible cancer known as devil facial tumor disease (DFTD). This fatal cancer is clonally derived and is an allograft transmitted between devils by biting. We performed a large-scale genetic analysis of DFTD with microsatellite genotyping, a mitochondrial genome analysis, and deep sequencing of the DFTD transcriptome and microRNAs. These studies confirm that DFTD is a monophyletic clonally transmissible tumor and suggest that the disease is of Schwann cell origin. On the basis of these results, we have generated a diagnostic marker for DFTD and identify a suite of genes relevant to DFTD pathology and transmission. We provide a genomic data set for the Tasmanian devil that is applicable to cancer diagnosis, disease evolution, and conservation biology. † To whom correspondence should be addressed. DFTD appears to be a clonal cell line, transmitted (by biting) as an allograft between devils (5,6) and may be similar in transmission to canine transmissible venereal tumor (CTVT) and a transmissible sarcoma affecting Syrian hamsters (7-9). The prevalence and biology of such somatic cell parasites is generally unknown (10).Studies of captive Tasmanian devils have suggested that the species is prone to developing tumors, particularly carcinomas (11,12). However, DFTD does not resemble previously described devil cancers (3,13), and determining its etiology is critical for developing management strategies for the disease. Cytologically, DFTD appears as a soft tissue neoplasm consisting of undifferentiated round to spindle-shaped cells with few defining ultrastructural features (3,13). Immunohistochemistry suggests that the tumor is derived from neuroectoderm (13).Clonal transmission of DFTD was proposed on the basis of karyotypic evidence (5) and was supported by genetic analysis of DFTD tumors at microsatellite and major histocompatibility complex loci (6). We genotyped at 14 micro-satellite loci 25 paired tumor and host samples, as well as 10 samples from DFTD-unaffected devils from 16 locations in Tasmania (14) (figs. S1 and S2 and table S1). All DFTD tumors shared a similar genotype across all loci, regardless of location, sex, or age of the animal (P = 0.18, permutation test) (figs. S1 and S2). Furthermore, the tumor genotype was distinct from that of both the hosts and unaffected devils (P < 0.001, permutation test) (figs. S1 and S2). These data were consistent with previous studies (5,6) and support the supposition that DFTD is a single clonal cell line propagated as a tumor allograft.To further assess the clonal origin of DFTD, we sequenced a 1180-base pair fragment of the mitochondrial locus control region (LCR) from 14 tumors, 14 hosts, and 9 DFTD-unaffected devils (table S2). We found that all devils and tumors shared a single LCR haplotype in this region, except for one single-nucleotide polymorphism at position 15,711, which supported the idea that the tumors are clonal. Furthermore, this nucleotide variant was...
Devil facial tumour disease (DFTD) is a transmissible cancer devastating the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) population. The cancer cell is the ‘infectious’ agent transmitted as an allograft by biting. Animals usually die within a few months with no evidence of antibody or immune cell responses against the DFTD allograft. This lack of anti-tumour immunity is attributed to an absence of cell surface major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-I molecule expression. While the endangerment of the devil population precludes experimentation on large experimental groups, those examined in our study indicated that immunisation and immunotherapy with DFTD cells expressing surface MHC-I corresponded with effective anti-tumour responses. Tumour engraftment did not occur in one of the five immunised Tasmanian devils, and regression followed therapy of experimentally induced DFTD tumours in three Tasmanian devils. Regression correlated with immune cell infiltration and antibody responses against DFTD cells. These data support the concept that immunisation of devils with DFTD cancer cells can successfully induce humoral responses against DFTD and trigger immune-mediated regression of established tumours. Our findings support the feasibility of a protective DFTD vaccine and ultimately the preservation of the species.
As the support of host communities is a precondition for a sustainable industry, regional social impact studies are a crucial input to tourism planning and decisionmaking. This study assessed the social impacts of tourism in a rural region of Australia where tourism is an important sector of the economy. As well as providing data to aid regional tourism planning, this study identifi es differences in personal and community-wide impacts; advances understanding of the factors that infl uence residents' perceptions of tourism impacts; and assesses the degree to which tourism activity associated with protected areas contributes to the identifi ed social impacts. across a range of sectors (Davidson and Lockwood, 2007), including tourism. Naturebased tourism is a key industry sector (De Lacy and Whitmore, 2006), and a signifi cant proportion of regional nature-based tourism is focused on protected areas. The work, as well as providing data to aid regional tourism planning and management, aimed to
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.