The use of beta-blockers in the first 24 h of patients presenting with NSTEACS was associated with better in-hospital and long-term mortality outcomes.
Aims To evaluate whether a strategy of double-dose influenza vaccination during hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared with standard-dose outpatient vaccination (as recommended by current guidelines) would further reduce the risk of major cardiopulmonary events. Methods and results Vaccination against Influenza to Prevent cardiovascular events after Acute Coronary Syndromes (VIP-ACS) was a pragmatic, randomized, multicentre, active-comparator, open-label trial with blinded outcome adjudication comparing two strategies of influenza vaccination following an ACS: double-dose quadrivalent inactivated vaccine before hospital discharge vs. standard-dose quadrivalent inactivated vaccine administered in the outpatient setting 30 days after randomization. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, urgent coronary revascularization, and hospitalization for respiratory causes, analysed by the win ratio method. Patients were followed for 12 months. During two influenza seasons, 1801 participants were included at 25 centres in Brazil. The primary outcome was not different between groups, with 12.7% wins in-hospital double-dose vaccine group and 12.3% wins in the standard-dose vaccine group {win ratio: 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79–1.32], P = 0.84}. Results were consistent for the key secondary outcome, a hierarchical composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke [win ratio: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.66–1.33), P = 0.72]. Time-to-first event analysis for the primary outcome showed results similar to those of the main analysis [hazard ratio 0.97 (95% CI: 0.75–1.24), P = 0.79]. Adverse events were infrequent and did not differ between groups. Conclusion Among patients hospitalized with an ACS, double-dose influenza vaccination before discharge did not reduce cardiopulmonary outcomes compared with standard-dose vaccination in the outpatient setting. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04001504
Background Patients with multivessel or complex coronary artery disease (CAD) are at increased risk of atherothrombotic events. It has been suggested that these patients may derive an incremental benefit with more intense antiplatelet strategies, according to prior subgroup analyses from randomized clinical trials. However, whether there is any association between the presence and extension of multivessel CAD and platelet aggregability (PA) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unknown. Purpose To analyze the independent association between PA and presence of multivessel CAD in patients with ACS. Methods Patients with ACS on dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) were included in this study. Multivessel CAD was defined as the presence of significant ≥50% stenosis at two or more major epicardic vessels. Platelet aggregability was assessed by VerifyNow P2Y12 assay expressed in P2Y12 Reactivity Units (PRU) on the day of discharge from the coronary care unit. High On-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as PRU ≥208. Stepwise linear and logistic regression models were applied to adjust for confounders. Models were adjusted for: age, sex, race, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, prior MI, prior PCI, prior CABG, prior HF, prior stroke and ACS phenotype (STEMI vs. Non-ST-segment elevation ACS). Results A total of 237 patients were included, among whom 143 (60.3%) had multivessel CAD at the coronary angiogram and 175 (73.8%) were submitted to PCI during index hospitalization. Patients with multivessel disease were older (mean age 64.8±12.1 vs. 58.9±11.2 years; p<0.001) and more likely to have a history of diabetes (47.6% vs. 29.8%; p=0.006) and non-ST-segment elevation ACS as the index event (55.2% vs. 28.7%; p<0.001), compared to patients without multivessel CAD. After adjustments, presence of multivessel CAD was associated with higher PA (mean 161.4±74 PRU in patients with versus 140.3±70.9 PRU in patients without multivessel CAD; adjusted mean difference 23.7 PRU; 95% CI 4.8 to 42.5; p=0.014). Additionally, there was an incremental of 12.5 PRU (95% CI 2.8 to 22.3; adj p=0.012) for each diseased vessel and of 4.67 PRU (95% CI 0.11 to 9.22; adj p=0.045) for each diseased coronary segment. Compared to patients with single-vessel disease, patients with three-vessel disease had higher rates of HPR. (Figure). Conclusion In patients with ACS, the presence and extension of multivessel CAD were associated with higher levels of platelet aggregability and higher rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity with clopidogrel. This finding may explain the incremental benefit with more intense antiplatelet therapies seen in this particular subgroup in prior clinical trials. Prevalence of HPR and extension of CAD Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
OBJECTIVES: Returning to work after an episode of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is challenging for many patients, and has both personal and social impacts. There are limited data regarding the working status in the very long-term after ACS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1,632 patients who were working prior to hospitalization for ACS in a quaternary hospital and were followed-up for up to 17 years. Adjusted models were developed to analyze the variables independently associated with actively working at the last contact, and a prognostic predictive index for not working at follow-up was developed. RESULTS: The following variables were significantly and independently associated with actively working at the last contact: age>median (hazard-ratio [HR], 0.76, p <0.001); male sex (HR, 1.52, p <0.001); government health insurance (HR, 1.36, p <0.001); history of angina (HR, 0.69, p <0.001) or myocardial infarction (MI) (HR, 0.76, p =0.005); smoking (HR, 0.81, p =0.015); ST-elevation MI (HR, 0.81, p =0.021); anterior-wall MI (HR, 0.75, p =0.001); non-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (HR, 0.77, p =0.002); fibrinolysis (HR, 0.61, p <0.001); cardiogenic shock (HR, 0.60, p =0.023); statin (HR, 3.01, p <0.001), beta-blocker (HR, 1.26, p =0.020), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) (HR, 1.37, p =0.001) at hospital discharge; and MI at follow-up (HR, 0.72, p =0.001). The probability of not working at the last contact ranged from 24.2% for patients with no variables, up to 80% for patients with six or more variables. CONCLUSIONS: In patients discharged after ACS, prior and in-hospital clinical variables, as well as the quality of care at discharge, have a great impact on the long-term probability of actively working.
Resumo Fundamento O maior risco de se desenvolver diabetes com o uso de estatinas é um desafio para a segurança do uso dessa classe de medicamentos em longo prazo. No entanto, poucos estudos analisaram essa questão durante síndromes coronarianas agudas (SCA). Objetivos Investigar a associação entre início precoce da terapia com estatina e níveis de glicemia em pacientes admitidos com SCA. Métodos Este foi um estudo retrospectivo de pacientes hospitalizados por SCA. Pacientes que nunca haviam usado estatinas foram incluídos e divididos segundo uso ou não de estatina nas primeiras 24 horas de internação. O desfecho primário foi a incidência de hiperglicemia na internação (definida como pico de glicemia > 200mg/dL). Modelos de regressão logística e modelos lineares multivariados foram usados para ajuste quanto a fatores de confusão e um modelo de pareamento por escore de propensão foi desenvolvido para comparações entre os dois grupos de interesses. Um valor de p menor que 0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. Resultados Um total de 2357 pacientes foram incluídos, 1704 deles alocados no grupo que receberam estatinas e 653 no grupo que não receberam estatinas nas primeiras 24 horas de internação. Após os ajustes, uso de estatina nas primeiras 24 horas foi associado com uma menor incidência de hiperglicemia durante a internação (OR ajustado = 0,61, IC95% 0,46-0,80; p < 0,001) e menor necessidade de uso de insulina (OR ajustado = 0,56, IC 95% 0,41-0,76; p < 0,001). Essas associações mantiveram-se similares nos modelos de pareamento por escore de propensão, bem como após análises de sensibilidade, como exclusão de pacientes que desenvolveram choque cardiogênico, infecção grave ou pacientes que foram a óbito durante a internação hospitalar. Conclusões Entre os pacientes internados com SCA que não receberam estatinas previamente, a terapia precoce com estatina associou-se independentemente com menor incidência de hiperglicemia durante a internação. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(2):285-294)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.