For cementation of yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconium polycrystal (Y-TZP) ceramic frameworks, protocols of surface-conditioning methods and available cements vary, resulting in confusion among clinicians regarding selection and effects of different conditioning methods on cement adhesion. This study evaluated the effect of two silanes (3-trimethoxysilylpropylmethacrylate (MPS) and 3-trimethoxysilylpropylmethacrylate/4-methacryloyloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride methyl methacrylate (MPS/4-META) on the adhesion of two resin-based cements (SuperBond and Panavia F 2.0) to Y-TZP ceramic and compared several protocols with those indicated by the manufacturer of each of these cements. Disks of Y-TZP ceramic (LAVA, 3M ESPE) (n = 60) were divided into six experimental groups (n = 10 per group) and treated as follows: (1) silica coating (SC) + MPS silane + SuperBond; (2) SC + MPS/4-META + silane + SuperBond); (3) SC + MPS silane + Panavia F 2.0); (4) SC + MPS/4-META silane + Panavia F 2.0); (5) no conditioning + MPS/4-META silane + Super-Bond (SuperBond instructions); and (6) 50-μm Al(2)O(3) conditioning + Panavia F 2.0 (Panavia F 2.0 instructions). The specimens were subjected to shear-bond testing after water storage at 37 °C for 3 months in the dark. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD (α = 0.05). After silica coating, the mean bond strength of SuperBond cement was not significantly different between MPS and MPS/4-META silanes (20.2 ± 3.7 and 20.9 ± 1.6 MPa, respectively), but the mean bond strength of Panavia F 2.0 was significantly higher with MPS silane (24.4 ± 5.3 MPa) than with MPS/4-META (12.3 ± 1.4 MPa) (P < 0.001). The SuperBond manufacturer's instructions alone resulted in significantly higher bond strength (9.7 ± 3.1 MPa) than the Panavia F 2.0 manufacturer's instruction (0 MPa) (P < 0.001). When silica coating and silanization were used, both SuperBond and Panavia F 2.0 cements demonstrated higher bond strengths they did when the manufacturers' instructions were followed. With SuperBond, use of MPS or MPS/4-META silane resulted in no significant difference when the ceramic surface was silica coated, but with Panavia F 2.0, use of MPS silane resulted in a significantly higher bond strength than use of MPS/4-META. Use of chairside silica coating and silanization to condition the zirconia surface improved adhesion compared with the manufacturers' cementation protocols for SuperBond and Panavia F 2.0 resin cements.
This in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the interaction between the shear bond strength and the surface treatment method for a commercial dental ceramic. Ninety bonded ceramic units were manufactured for this study. Each unit was made by luting two cylinder-shaped ceramic samples to each other with a resin-composite luting agent. The units were then divided into nine groups, containing 10 units in each group. Samples from each group were treated with one of the following: etching with 4.9% hydrofluoric acid for 10, 20 and 40 s, 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 10, 20 and 40 s, 40% orthophosphoric acid for 40 s, air abrasion with alumina in 50-microm particles, and grinding with a high-speed diamond bur. The treated samples were then silanated and luted with a resin-composite luting agent. The luted units were then loaded to failure. Two samples from each group were neither silanated nor luted after the surface treatment procedure, and morphological changes obtained by various surface treatment regimens were investigated by scanning electron microscopy. A statistically significant difference was observed among the mean shear bond strengths of the groups prepared with different surface treatment techniques (P = 0.00). Hydrofluoric acid appeared to be the most suitable chemical medium to produce a reliable ceramic bond. Etching time and concentration of the acidic medium were also observed as important prognostic variates. Orthophosphoric acid treatment was observed to be the least effective surface treatment method on the heat-pressed ceramic samples. Physical applications such as bur grinding and air blasting maintained stronger bonds than the orthophosphoric acid, while producing weaker bonds than surfaces treated with hydrofluoric acid in all concentrations and etching periods. The effect of the silane priming agent was not considered in this study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.