Decentralisation has been advocated by donors and development agencies as an instrument to ensure broader participation of citizens as well as to improve local governance leading to poverty reduction from the bottom up. On the basis of a comprehensive review of nine case studies documented in the literature, this study questions this assumption. According to our findings, a clear link between decentralisation and a reduction in poverty cannot be established. Two important policy lessons emerge from this study. First, in an environment where the central state barely fulfils basic functions and is not interested in giving power and resources to local tiers of government, decentralisation should not be a priority for donors as it could be rather counter-productive. Second, in countries that fulfil basic prerequisites, decentralisation could be a powerful tool for poverty reduction.La décentralisation a été mise en avant par les partenaires au développement comme un instrument permettant d'assurer la participation des citoyens à la définition des politiques publiques ainsi que l'amélioration de la gouvernance locale, débouchant ainsi sur une approche participative de la réduction de la pauvreté. Sur la base d'une revue systématique de neuf études de cas de référence sur le sujet, cet article remet en cause cette hypothèse. Nous concluons en effet qu'il est impossible d'établir un lien clair entre décentralisation et réduction de la pauvreté. Dès lors, ce travail aboutit à deux recommandations importantes. Tout d'abord, dans un contexte où l'É tat central parvient à
Complete document available on OLIS in its original format This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
This series gathers together OECD working papers on the tools, governance and institutions of better regulation and their impact on policy outcomes. It includes both technical and analytical material, prepared by staff and experts in the field. Together, the papers provide valuable context and background for OECD publications on regulatory policy and governance. OECD Working Papers should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries. The opinions expressed and arguments employed are those of the authors.
The papers are generally available only in their original language English or French with a summary in the other if available. This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.