No abstract

Heparin-based anticoagulant drugs have been widely used for the prevention of blood clotting during surgical procedures and for the treatment of thromboembolic events. However, bleeding risks associated with these anticoagulants demand continuous monitoring and neutralization with suitable antidotes. Protamine, the only clinically approved antidote to heparin, has shown adverse effects and ineffectiveness against low-molecular weight heparins and fondaparinux, a heparin-related medication. Alternative approaches based on cationic molecules and recombinant proteins have several drawbacks including limited efficacy, toxicity, immunogenicity, and high cost. Thus, there is an unmet clinical need for safer, rapid, predictable, and cost-effective anticoagulant-reversal agents for all clinically used heparins. We report a design strategy for a fully synthetic dendritic polymer-based universal heparin reversal agent (UHRA) that makes use of multivalent presentation of branched cationic heparin binding groups (HBGs). Optimization of the UHRA design was aided by isothermal titration calorimetry studies, biocompatibility evaluation, and heparin neutralization analysis. By controlling the scaffold's molecular weight, the nature of the protective shell, and the presentation of HBGs on the polymer scaffold, we arrived at lead UHRA molecules that completely neutralized the activity of all clinically used heparins. The optimized UHRA molecules demonstrated superior efficacy and safety profiles and mitigated heparin-induced bleeding in animal models. This new polymer therapeutic may benefit patients undergoing high-risk surgical procedures and has potential for the treatment of anticoagulant-related bleeding problems.

There is experimental evidence that low-molecular-weight fractions of heparin are as effective as the standard form but cause less bleeding. We therefore performed a double-blind, randomized trial comparing PK10169 low-molecular-weight heparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thrombosis in patients undergoing elective hip surgery. Prophylactic treatment with a fixed dose was begun postoperatively and continued for 14 days. Fifty patients in each treatment group underwent surveillance with [125I]fibrinogen leg scanning and impedance plethysmography. In the first 24 patients, venography was performed only if either surveillance test was positive. Because the rate of venous thrombosis detected in those patients was unexpectedly low, venography was requested in the remaining 76 patients, even if the screening tests were negative. In this latter group, venous thrombosis occurred in 4 patients (10.8 percent) given PK10169 heparin and 20 patients (51.3 percent) given placebo (P = 0.0002); the corresponding rates for proximal-vein thrombosis were 5.4 percent and 23.1 percent, respectively (P = 0.029). In the entire group of 100 patients, venous thrombosis occurred in 12 percent of those given PK10169 heparin and 42 percent of those given placebo (P = 0.0007), and the corresponding rates for proximalvein thrombi were 4 percent and 20 percent, respectively (P = 0.014). The observed hemorrhagic rate was 4 percent in each treatment group. We conclude that prophylaxis with fixed-dose PK10169 heparin is effective and safe for patients undergoing elective hip replacement.

The diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in critically ill patients is complicated by lack of information on the frequency of HIT relative to thrombocytopenia from other causes. In addition, results from HIT diagnostic tests have not been clearly evaluated for clinical utility. In this prospective study, we estimated the frequency of HIT and the predictive performance of the heparin-platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (heparin-PF4 ELISA) in 748 consecutive, heparin-treated patients in a combined intensive and coronary care unit. The criteria for diagnosis were as follows: two or more consecutive platelet counts below 150 x 10(3)/mm3 or a 33% or greater decrease in platelet count 5 or more days after beginning heparin, or any time after starting heparin for patients exposed to the agent within the previous 8 weeks; and a positive 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA), the reference standard. Specificity and predictive values for the heparin-PF4 ELISA were estimated in patients who met the clinical criteria for HIT. Of 748 patients, 267 were exposed to heparin for a sufficient length of time to be considered to be at risk for HIT. Forty of these patients (15.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.7%-19.3%) met the clinical criteria for HIT. Serum samples were available for 32 of these patients, one of whom tested positive by the SRA, yielding a HIT frequency of 0.39% (95% CI 0.01-2.1%). The specificity of the heparin-PF4 ELISA among thrombocytopenic patients with negative SRA results was 71%, and the positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of this test were estimated to be 10% and 100%, respectively. The point estimate of the frequency of HIT in critically ill patients was less than 1% in this cohort. The low PPV and high NPV of the heparin-PF4 ELISA suggest that it can be used to exclude HIT as a cause of thrombocytopenia in this patient population.

Newer PASs, for example, SSP+ and Composol, can maintain PLT integrity and moderate metabolism similarly to plasma but offer consistently lower PLT recoveries and limited osmotic balance.