The not uncommon association in clinical practice of problems existing simultaneously in the kidney and ear, prompted a closer look at these two distant organs, revealing in fact that they may be comparable in a variety of ways. Anatomical similarities were seen especially at the ultra‐structural level. Physiological mechanisms of fluid and electrolyte balance are present in both organs, and this common function is reflected in similar pharmacological actions of certain drugs. Congenital syndromes which have both renal and hearing defects have been the subject of much investigation attempting to relate a single etiological process in a common pathogenesis. To investigate a possible existence of shared antigenicity the tools of immunochemistry and immunohistochemistry were employed in experimental studies comparing the kidney with the lateral cochlear wall. The experimental animals chosen were the rat and guinea pig. Anti‐rat sera and anti‐guinea pig sera were produced using the goat or rabbit respectively as the antibody producing animal. In order to produce the antisera, specimens of stria vascularis were dissected from the cochlea. The collected specimens were then placed in saline and Complete Freunds Adjuvant, emulsified and then injected into subcutaneous sites of rabbits. After about 10 days the blood was withdrawn and the serum extracted from the blood. This crude serum was then used in subsequent experiments as the anticochlea antibody (AC Ab). In a similar manner glomerular basement membrane antibody was prepared (AGBM Ab). Two methods of immunofluorescent staining were used, namely, the indirect and direct method. In the indirect method, frozen sections of normal cochlea or renal tissue specimens were treated with the previously prepared AC Ab or AGBM Ab and then counterstained with Fluorescein labeled goat anti‐rabbit gamma globulin serum (GARG‐Fl). In the direct method tissue specimens from guinea pigs that had been injected with either AC Ab or AGBM Ab were stained directly with GARG‐Fl. In a third part of the experiments, the left cochlea from each animal injected with either AGBM Ab or AC Ab was taken for light histology. The results of these experiments are summarized in Tables I, II, and III. Of marked significance in our studies is the observation that AC Ab is capable of staining renal tubular epithelium. This presents compelling evidence of antigenically similar epithelial components. In conclusion, there is a fascinating similarity between the cochlea and the kidney. This similarity extends through a variety of modalities. There is even experimental evidence of a possibility of antigenically similar epithelial components.

In a survey of 49 papilloma patients accurate maternal condyloma history was obtained in 31 instances and of these, 21 were positive for the presence of condyloma during pregnancy or parturition. Molecular virological studies indicate that positive hybridization could be demonstrated to human papilloma virus 2 in both laryngeal papilloma and condyloma by the Southern blot technique. Immunoperoxidase staining illustrated the presence of virus-related particles only near the surface of the mucous membrane papilloma, which is in contrast to the definite staining of the stratum granulosum and stratum corneum of verrucae. Collectively this provides convincing evidence for an etiological relationship between condyloma acuminata and some laryngeal papillomata. The highly contagious nature of human papilloma virus infection is discussed and the possibility of cesarian section in the presence of active condyloma must be considered.

No abstract

No abstract

Hearing loss in renal dialysis and renal transplant patients occurs quite frequently. An assessment of the likely etiological factors is nearly impossible in a retrospective analysis of any one patient because many factors exist simultaneously. In a prospective study of a large series of patients an identification of factors contributing to the hearing loss was possible in the majority of patients. During the study it became increasingly apparent that what was observed at any one time was the combined effect of many factors. Although one factor seemed to precipitate the hearing loss it was inadvisable to attribute total responsibility to that agent or circumstance. Further, this combined effect was not a simple addition of effects but potentiation. The serious implications of this phenomenon are discussed.