Testosterone supplementation (TS) is assumed important for cognitive functioning in men, but conflicting results have prevented firm conclusions. The current study systematically reviewed available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on effects of TS on cognitive functioning in men, subjected the findings to meta-analysis, and explored between-study differences as possible moderators of the effects. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, two authors independently searched for eligible records in the electronic databases of PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, and Embase and determined eligibility using the following (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) criteria: population, male adults (>18 years); intervention, TS; comparison, placebo; and outcome, results of standardized neuropsychological tests. Following duplicate removal, 3873 records were screened with 92 remaining for full-text screening. Twenty-one papers reporting results of 23 independent RCTs were included, of which none treated samples of clinically hypogonadal men. The small improvement found in overall cognitive functioning (Hedges g = 0.09; CI 95%: −0.02 to 0.19) failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.108) and approached zero when adjusting for possible publication bias (g = 0.04). The effects for the 11 individual cognitive domains did not reach statistical significance (g: −0.04 to 0.19, P: 0.061 to 0.989). Small statistically significant (P < 0.05) effects were found for five study subsets but failed to meet the fail-safe criterion. The available evidence indicates that effects of TS on cognitive functioning in men with testosterone levels within normal ranges are less robust and of insufficient magnitude to be of clinical relevance. The effects in clinically hypogonadal men remain to be investigated.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Evidence suggests that patients with prostate cancer (PCPs) receiving androgen‐deprivation therapy (ADT) are at risk for cognitive impairment. Research with other populations with cancer indicates that cognitive impairment may also occur before systemic treatment. The authors assessed cognitive impairment in untreated PCPs referred to ADT and explored associations with structural brain networks, endocrine status, and selected genotypes. Methods Forty untreated PCPs and 27 healthy controls (HCs) who completed a questionnaire package underwent neuropsychological testing, magnetic resonance imaging, and blood sampling. Cognitive impairment was defined as a z score ≤−2 on 1 neuropsychological test or ≤−1.5 on 2 neuropsychological tests. Structural brain networks were investigated using diffusion‐weighted imaging and graph theory. Associations of cognitive performance with patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs), brain networks, testosterone levels, and genotypes (apolipoprotein ε [APOE], catechol‐O‐methyltransferase [COMT], and brain‐derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF]) were explored. Results PCPs performed poorer than HCs on 7 of 15 neuropsychological tests and exhibited a higher frequency of cognitive impairment (57.5% vs 22.2%; P ≤ .01 to .03). All neuropsychological outcomes were associated with ≥1 PROM (P ≤ .01 to .04). Compared with the HC group, the PCP group exhibited altered global network organization as well as disrupted regional network characteristics in frontal and temporal regions (P < .01). PCPs had lower testosterone levels (P < .01) than HCs, which correlated with better visuospatial performance (r = −0.33; P = .04). No effects were found of APOE, COMT, or BDNF. Conclusions The current results suggest that untreated PCPs may demonstrate cognitive impairment and that psychological and behavioral symptoms (PROMs), as well as impairment in structural brain networks, might be the underlying mechanisms.

No abstract