Objective:To explore women's experience with continuing breastfeeding when they returned to work. Design and Sample:A cross-sectional study was conducted. Participants were female employees at the University of Seville who gave birth in the last 10 years while working at University. Measures:A questionnaire in Spanish was used to collect information on sociodemographic variables, employment characteristics, continued breastfeeding behavior after returning to work and the dimensions of the validated scale the Workplace Breastfeeding Support Scale (WBSS). Results:A total of 197 women responded, consisting of 53.8% faculty and 46.2% administrative staff. Almost all the women had breastfed their children (92.9%). The proportion of women who continued to breastfeed after they returned to work was 51.3%. The main reason given for interrupting lactation was the challenge of reconciling family and work (53.1%). Faculty members took more breaks for breastfeeding (p = 0.002) and were able to arrange their breaks more easily (p < 0.001). Since it was easier for them to find a quiet place to pump breast milk (p = 0.025), they were more likely to continue breastfeeding after returning to work than were administrative staff (59.8% vs. 41.1%, p < 0.009). Conclusion:A designated lactation space and amenities should be provided in order to extend the duration of breastfeeding. K E Y W O R D Sbarrier, breastfeeding, lactation, support, workplace | 371 LEON-LARIOS Et AL.
Background In 2003, the World Health Organization recommended exclusive breastfeeding (EB) during the newborn’s first 6 months of life and, if possible, during the first 2 years. However, EB rates resist these recommendations. In developed countries, only 1 out of 3 babies is breastfed during its first 6 months of life, and great differences between areas and countries can be observed. Only 35% of the newborns receive breastfeeding at 3–4 months of age. There are diverse strategies described in the literature that have proven their efficiency in improving breastfeeding rates. It has also been proven that professional support is an effective tool to extend any kind of breastfeeding; besides, it has been observed that mother-to-mother support also increases breastfeeding initiation, sustainment, and exclusive duration. The overall aim of the study is to assess the impact of the support groups on the sustainment of exclusive breastfeeding until 6 months after birth. Methods/design This study is a cluster-random multicentric clinical trial with a control group and an intervention group, without blinding because it is impossible to mask the intervention. A randomization by centres of primary health (clusters) will be carried out. The women allocated to the intervention or control group will be randomized with a simple randomization sampling. The participants’ breastfeeding rate will be followed up at the first 10 days, and at 2, 4, and 6 months of their newborn’s life. Discussion There is a need to assess the impact of mother support groups on exclusive breastfeeding. This study aims to analyse the outcomes related to the support received and to identify what should the structure of these groups be; in other words, to describe factors related to a better breastfeeding experience in order to help women increase breastfeeding rates. Trial registration The trial is prospectively recorded at the ISRCTN registry (Trial ID: ISRCTN17263529). Date recorded: 17/06/2020.
The emergency contraception pill (ECP) is a non-prescribed medication in Spain. However, there is not enough evidence of its use among young people to define sex education contents. The aims of this research were to describe the experiences of the use of the ECP in university students and analyze their knowledge, attitude, and awareness regarding the ECP. The cross-sectional, analytic study was conducted with nursing degree students at the University of Seville. A total of 478 students answered the questionnaire. All of the students (100%) had heard about the ECP and had a positive attitude towards this contraceptive. A total of 25.7% had used the ECP, mainly because a condom had failed or because they did not use any contraceptive at all. Deficiencies in knowledge are related with the ECPs’ mechanism of action, efficacy after repeated use, and the type of ECP available. Female students who used no method at all or withdrawal, and who were over 20 years old, used ECP to a greater extent (p < 0.005). Further education initiatives focused on the use of the ECP, its efficacy, and typology are needed, particularly among future health professionals who will later educate other young people.
Objetivo: diseñar y validar un instrumento específico para valorar los mitos, estereotipos, tabúes y conocimientos sobre la menstruación. Diseño: estudio instrumental en el que se diseñó y validó un cuestionario. Emplazamiento: Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología de la Universidad de Sevilla. Participantes: 182 estudiantes. Intervenciones: índice de Osterlind, alfa de Cronbach, prueba KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin), test de esfericidad de Bartlett y método Varimax con normalización Kaiser. Mediciones principales: mitos, estereotipos, tabúes y conocimientos sobre la menstruación. Resultados: Se han realizado tres análisis factoriales, obteniendo un valor de convergencia general que explica el 67.978 % de la varianza total y fiabilidad global de .72422 ítems con 22 ítems y una validez de constructo que demuestra la existencia de 4 dimensiones con .653 en la prueba KMO y 777.53 en el índice de esfericidad de Barlett (p .50). Conclusiones: se ha obtenido una herramienta útil y válida para evaluar los mitos, estereotipos, tabúes y conocimientos sobre la menstruación que permita un manejo adecuado de la misma en consultas de Atención Primaria y/o en el entorno escolar.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.