Abstract. Glaciers on Kilimanjaro are unique indicators for climatic change in the
tropical midtroposphere of Africa, but their disappearance seems imminent.
A key unknown is their present ice thickness. Here, we present thickness
maps for the Northern Ice Field (NIF) and Kersten Glacier (KG) with mean
values of 26.6 and 9.3 m, respectively, in 2011. In absence of direct
measurements on KG, multitemporal satellite information was exploited to
infer past thickness values in areas that have become ice-free and therefore
allow glacier-specific calibration. In these areas, KG is unrealistically
thick in the existing consensus estimate of global glacier ice thickness.
<p>The glaciers on Kilimanjaro are unique indicators for climatic changes in the tropical mid-troposphere of Africa. Glaciers in the tropics have shown a severe retreat since the Last Glacial Maximum and the glaciers on Mt. Kilimanjaro are no exception, with an 85% reduction in glacier area from 1912 to 2013. This history of severe glacier area loss raises concerns about an imminent future disappearance. Yet, the remaining ice volume is not well known.</p><p>By combining state-of-the-art techniques from satellite remote sensing and glacier mass balance modelling with data assimilation, we inferred the&#160; glacier ice thickness of two selected glaciers on Mt. Kilimanjaro. We reconstruct thickness maps for 2000 and 2011 for the Northern Icefield and Kersten Glacier and find mean thickness values of 26.6 and 9.3 m for 2011, respectively. Model validation was difficult for Kersten Glacier, as no ice thickness&#160; measurements were available. Thus, the first attempt to use decadal retreat information, to infer past glacier ice thickness, which are used to do a glacier-specific calibration of the ice thickness reconstruction, was conducted by creating a generic margin thickness from glacier outlines and DEM differencing. This approach proved to be reasonable for Kersten Glacier, where a more common glacier type was assumed, but seemed to underestimate ice thickness at the Northern Icefield, because of the complex topography.</p><p>The poster summarizes the results obtained from the thickness reconstructions and compares them to thickness maps from an existing global consensus estimate. In comparison to our results the consensus estimate shows unrealistically thick values for KG in areas that are meanwhile ice-free. A rough projection on glacier recession based on the generated thickness data agrees with other estimates pointing towards the disappearance of the glaciers between 2040 and 2060.</p>
2) from 2005-2013 generated with the distributed, physically-based MB model by Mölg et al. (2008, 2009a). Background: hillshade of the KILISoSDEM (Sirguey and Cullen 2013).
Abstract. Glaciers on Kilimanjaro are unique indicators for climatic changes in the tropical mid-troposphere of Africa. The history of severe glacier area loss raises concerns about an imminent future disappearance. Yet, the remaining ice volume is not well known. We reconstruct thickness maps for 2000 and 2011 for the Northern Icefield (NIF) and Kersten Glacier (KG) that are informed by ground-truth thickness measurements and multi-temporal satellite information. For 2011, we find mean thickness values of 26.6 and 9.3 m, respectively. The existing consensus estimate for global glacier ice thickness shows unrealistically thick values for KG in areas that are meanwhile ice-free.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.