This essay challenges the contention that Donne's "Extasie" is a
seduction poem, the now current reading initally resisted by distinguished
scholars such as Herbert J. C. Grierson, Helen Gardner, and Merritt
Y. Hughes. Their failure to defend Donne's seriousness is traced to
three main sources: 1) fashionable Freudian, New Critical, and/or New
Historical irony; 2) the semi-secrecy of the "voluptuous rationalist"
tradition behind the poem; and 3) Donne's technique of "scandalously"
challenging the conservative humanist and/or Puritan reaction against
incarnational Neo-Platonism. Focusing mainly on the two latter points,
this essay excavates the poem's roots in Plato, Epicurus, Cusanus,
Marsilio Ficino, Pico della Mirandola, and their late Renaissance
revitalizers: Michel de Montaigne, Paracelsus, Desiderius Erasmus,
and Sir Thomas More.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.