PurposeTo report the surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with inferior retinotomy without the need for scleral buckling in primary inferior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) with inferior retinal breaks and Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) grades B or C.MethodsRetrospective, consecutive series, single‐center study of patients that underwent PPV with inferior retinotomy for primary inferior RRD with inferior retinal breaks (4:00 to 8:00 clock hours) and PVR grades B or C. Data were obtained from patients’ medical records from October 2014 to November 2020. The primary outcomes of the study were retinal reattachment and visual acuity improvement. Data collected before and after surgery was compared between groups using chi‐square analysis and paired samples t‐test. The resulting p‐values significance level was set at p = 0.05.ResultsThirty‐two patients (32 eyes) met the inclusion criteria. PVR in stage B was present in 19 patients and stage C in 13 patients. Macula‐off RRD was diagnosed in 25 patients while the other 7 patients had RRD with the macula attached. Regarding primary outcomes, 31 out of 32 (97%) patients achieved retinal reattachment with no differences between PVR groups (p = 0.406). The best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly in eyes with macula‐off RRD at presentation (p < 0.001). Although macula‐attached RRD eyes had higher final BCVA, its improvement was not statistically significant (p = 0.370). Besides one retinal redetachment, no other significant complications were reported after surgery.ConclusionsInferior retinal breaks are associated with surgical failure following PPV for inferior RRD repair, especially if advanced PVR is present. Our results suggest that, in these less common and more challenging cases, PPV with an inferior retinotomy is associated with very favorable anatomic and visual outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.