Dabigatran etexilate is a new oral anticoagulant used for the prevention of systemic thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Acute bleeding episodes are known to occur with dabigatran etexilate therapy; however, only a few case reports in the literature describe such events. We describe a 70-year-old man treated with dabigatran etexilate for newly diagnosed, nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who developed a large hemopericardium that appeared to be temporally related to dabigatran etexilate administration. One month after starting the drug, an incidental finding of a small pericardial effusion was found on echocardiography. One month later, the patient came to his pulmonologist's office complaining of shortness of breath; a large pericardial effusion was found on a noncontrast computed tomographic scan, and the patient was admitted to the hospital. Laboratory monitoring of his coagulation status was limited due to the lack of assays available to directly monitor the therapeutic effects of dabigatran. The internal laboratory was able to perform a dilute thrombin time (DTT) test as part of a quality improvement project aiming to validate an assay for monitoring patients receiving dabigatran therapy. A DTT was therefore performed in conjunction with routine coagulation assays to evaluate the patient's coagulation status. After pericardiocentesis, the patient recovered without incident and was discharged without anticoagulant therapy. Although the Naranjo adverse reaction probability scale only indicated a possible relationship (score of 1) between the patient's development of hemopericardium and dabigatran etexilate therapy, investigation into the patient's clinical course, comorbidities, and laboratory results led us to conclude that dabigatran etexilate was responsible for the hemopericardium. To our knowledge, this report is the first to describe a case of potentially life-threatening pericardial bleeding that was temporally related to starting dabigatran etexilate therapy. Although we found that the DTT was a viable method of monitoring coagulation status in a patient receiving dabigatran etexilate therapy, the assay lacks approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration, which limits its clinical utility and widespread use at this time. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for life-threatening bleeding with use of this agent and the difficulty associated with monitoring and reversing this therapy in the setting of acute bleeding.

BackgroundThe ability of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) to detect clinically significant hemorrhage in hypotensive injured patients remains unclear. We sought to describe the sensitivity and specificity of FAST using findings at laparotomy as the confirmatory test.MethodsPatients from the Prospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) study that had a systolic blood pressure < 90mm Hg and underwent FAST were analysed. Results were compared with findings at laparotomy. A therapeutic laparotomy (T-LAP) was defined as an abdominal operation within 6 hours in which a definitive procedure was performed. The sensitivity and specificity of FAST were calculated.ResultsThe cohort included 317 patients that underwent FAST (108 positive, 209 negative). T-LAP was performed in 69% (n=75) of FAST(+) patients and 22% (n=48) of FAST(−) patients. FAST had a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 83%.ConclusionsIn our multicenter cohort, 22% of FAST(−) patients underwent T-LAP within 6 hours of admission. In hypotensive patients with a negative FAST, clinicians should still maintain a high index of suspicion for significant abdominal hemorrhage.Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Adrenergic β-antagonists, commonly known as β-blockers, are prescribed for many indications including hypertension, heart failure, arrhythmias, and migraines. Metoprolol is a moderately lipophilic β-blocker that in overdose causes direct myocardial depression leading to bradycardia, hypotension, and the potential for cardiovascular collapse. We describe the case of a 59-year-old man who intentionally ingested ~7.5 g of metoprolol tartrate. Initial treatment of bradycardia and hypotension included glucagon, atropine, dopamine, and norepinephrine. Despite these treatment modalities, the patient developed cardiac arrest. Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) and hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia (HIE) therapies were initiated during advanced cardiac life support and were immediately followed by return of spontaneous circulation. Further treatment included gastric lavage, activated charcoal, continued vasopressor therapy, and a repeat bolus of ILE. The patient was weaned off vasoactive infusions and was extubated within 24 hours. HIE therapy was continued for 36 hours after metoprolol ingestion. A urine β-blocker panel using mass spectrometry revealed a metoprolol concentration of 120 ng/ml and the absence of other β-blocking agents. To date, no clear treatment guidelines are available for β-blocker overdose, and the response to toxic concentrations is highly variable. In this case of a life-threatening single-agent metoprolol overdose, the patient was successfully treated with HIE and ILE therapy. Due to the increasing frequency with which ILE and HIE are being used for the treatment of β-blocker overdose, clinicians should be aware of their dosing strategies and indications.

We found that while practice patterns were quite consistent in regard to the management of prophylactic anticoagulation, it varied widely in patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation. It seems that prophylactic anticoagulation use did not affect bleed risk with PEG/PDT.