Summary1. Combining landscape demographic and genetics models offers powerful methods for addressing questions for eco-evolutionary applications. 2. Using two illustrative examples, we present Cost-Distance Meta-POPulation, a program to simulate changes in neutral and/or selection-driven genotypes through time as a function of individual-based movement, complex spatial population dynamics, and multiple and changing landscape drivers. 3. Cost-Distance Meta-POPulation provides a novel tool for questions in landscape genetics by incorporating population viability analysis, while linking directly to conservation applications.
Diet of the northern river otter (Lontra canadensis (Schreber, 1777)) has been examined throughout much of its range and across many habitat types. Few studies have examined prey selection based on prey abundance estimates, however, and prey selection results have been inconsistent. We determined composition, seasonal variation, and prey selection of otter diet in northern Utah comprising multiple habitat types and prey communities. We evaluated the hypothesis that otters take prey according to availability and in inverse proportion to swimming ability. Fish was the primary class of prey taken by otters (96.5%), followed by crustaceans (16.9%). Among families, otter diet was composed primarily of Salmonidae and Cottidae, the two families that dominated the fish community of the main-channel habitat. Otter diet varied seasonally for nearly all classes (G [24] = 127.8, P < 0.001) and families (G [18] = 132.94, P < 0.001) of prey. In particular, fish occurrence was lower during summer than during other seasons (P ≤ 0.05), whereas crustacean (i.e., crayfish (Astacoidea)) occurrence was higher (G [3] = 71.1, P < 0.001). At the family level, occurrence of Salmonidae was greatest during fall (G [3] = 11.7, P < 0.01). Within one of our habitat types, we found otters to select for prey in proportion to abundance and in inverse proportion to swimming ability, with otters selecting for Catostomidae and Cyprinidae, against Salmonidae, and Cottidae according to its abundance. We conclude that habitat type may be the initial driver of prey selection, while factors such as abundance, agility, and life history of prey may be secondary drivers.Résumé : Le régime alimentaire de la loutre de rivière (Lontra canadensis (Schreber, 1777)) a été étudié dans la majeure partie de son aire de répartition et dans de nombreux types d'habitats. Peu d'études se sont toutefois penchées sur la sélection de proies à la lumière d'estimations de l'abondance des proies, et les résultats touchant à la sélection de proies se sont avérés peu cohérents. Nous avons déterminé la composition, les variations saisonnières et la sélection de proies de l'alimentation de la loutre dans le nord de l'Utah, une région qui comprend de nombreux types d'habitats et communautés de proies. Nous avons évalué l'hypothèse voulant que les loutres choisissent leurs proies selon leur disponibilité et de manière inversement proportionnelle à leur capacité natatoire. Les poissons constituaient la principale classe de proies prises par les loutres (96,5 %), suivis des crustacés (16,9 %). En ce qui concerne les familles, le régime des loutres était principalement composé de salmonidés et de cottidés, les deux familles dominantes de la communauté de poissons de l'habitat de chenal principal. Le régime alimentaire des loutres variait selon la saison pour presque toutes les classes (G [24] = 127,8, P < 0,001) et familles (G [18] = 132,94, P < 0,001) de proies. En particulier, la présence de poissons était plus faible durant l'été que durant d'autres saisons (P ≤ 0,05), alors que ...
Gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus Schreber, 1775) populations in portions of the eastern United States have experienced declines whose trajectories differ from those of other mesocarnivore populations. One hypothesis is that gray fox declines may result from interspecific interactions, particularly competition with abundant coyotes (Canis latrans Say, 1823). Alternatively, gray foxes may respond negatively to increased urbanization and reduced forest cover. To evaluate these hypotheses, we used single-species occupancy models of camera trap data to test the effects of habitat covariates, such as the amount of urbanization and forest, on coyote and gray fox occupancy. Additionally, we test the effect of an n-mixture based index of the number of coyotes at each camera trap site on gray fox occupancy. Results indicate that occupancy probabilities of coyote and gray fox relate positively to the amount of forest, but they provided no evidence urban cover impacts gray foxes. Additionally, gray fox occupancy was negatively related to the index of the number of coyotes at each site. Our models support the idea that interactions with coyotes impact gray fox occupancy across the eastern U.S. These results illustrate how large scale studies can relate mechanisms identified within specific landscapes to phenomena observed at larger scales.
The southeast corner of the East Anglian Fens supports a large concentration of Nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos territories. A total of 382 territories were located in extensive surveys in 1999 and 2000, probably representing over 5% of the English population. Transect counts revealed that the Fenland population is restricted in distribution and is associated with localized thickets of scrub. The highest densities are found on humus‐rich soils, suggesting that soil type, in addition to habitat availability, may have a strong influence on the Nightingale's distribution in this region. This paper provides the first assessment of habitat requirements of the Nightingale in scrub, which now forms a principal habitat for the species in England. Detailed studies of the attributes of over 100 Nightingale territories revealed subtle differences in the vegetation structure of these thickets when compared with paired, unoccupied, but apparently similar thickets. The Nightingale territories tended to have a higher proportion of bare ground or short vegetation in the field layer under the canopy, whereas paired sites were more likely to have low field layer vegetation beneath the canopy. The bare ground within the thickets is a feature of shading beneath very dense foliage cover. Within Nightingale territories, low field layer volume and shrub twig volume at the thicket edges was higher than in unoccupied thickets. The differences detected in vegetation structure suggest that a dense and continuous canopy forming a shell over bare ground but with dense low foliage at thicket edges provides the ideal vegetation structure for Nightingales in scrub habitats. Our study suggests that Nightingales occupy scrub of a very specific structure, and specific stage in vegetation succession. This structure probably provides an optimal combination of foraging habitat, microclimate and cover from predators. It is suggested that humus‐rich soils may be preferred because they may support a particularly rich source of invertebrate food, but this remains to be tested empirically.
The success of species reintroductions can depend on a combination of environmental, demographic, and genetic factors. Although the importance of these factors in the success of reintroductions is well‐accepted, they are typically evaluated independently, which can miss important interactions. For species that persist in metapopulations, movement through and interaction with the landscape is predicted to be a vital component of persistence. Simulation‐based approaches are a promising technique for evaluating the independent and combined effects of these factors on the outcome of various reintroduction and associated management actions. We report results from a simulation study of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) reintroduction to three watersheds of the Pend Oreille River system in northeastern Washington State, USA. We used an individual‐based, spatially explicit simulation model to evaluate how reintroduction strategies, life history variation, and riverscape structure (e.g., network topology) interact to influence the demographic and genetic characteristics of reintroduced bull trout populations in three watersheds. Simulation scenarios included a range of initial genetic stocks (informed by empirical bull trout genetic data), variation in migratory tendency and life history, and two landscape connectivity alternatives representing a connected network (isolation‐by‐distance) and a fragmented network (isolation‐by‐barrier, using the known existing barriers). A novel feature of these simulations was the ability to consider the interaction of both demographic and genetic (i.e., demogenetic) factors in riverscapes with implicit asymmetric movement probabilities across the barriers. We found that connectivity (presence or absence of barriers) had the largest effect on demographic and genetic outcomes over 200 yr, with a greater effect than both initial genetic diversity and life history variation. We also identified regions of the study system in which bull trout populations persisted across a wide range of demographic, life history, and environmental connectivity parameters. Finally, we found no evidence that initial neutral genetic diversity influenced genetic diversity and structure after 200 yr; instead, genetic drift due to stray rate and population isolation dominated and erased any initial differences in genetic diversity. Our results highlight the utility of spatially explicit demogenetic approaches in exploring and understanding population dynamics—and their implications for management strategies—in fresh waters.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.