WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: Interventions to reduce screen time in preschool-aged children are promising. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS:A screen time intervention in 3-year-old children implemented in the primary care setting did not reduce screen time or BMI. abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine if an intervention for preschool-aged children in primary care is effective in reducing screen time, meals in front of the television, and BMI. METHODS:A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a primary care pediatric group practice in Toronto, Canada. Three-year-old children and their parents were randomly assigned to receive a short behavioral counseling intervention on strategies to decrease screen time. The primary outcome 1 year later was parent reported screen time. Secondary outcomes included television in the child' s bedroom, number of meals in front of the television, and BMI. RESULTS:In the intention-to-treat analysis at 1 year, there were no significant differences in mean total weekday minutes of screen time (60, interquartile range [IQR]: 35-120 vs 65, IQR: 35-120; P = .68) or mean total weekend day minutes of screen time (80, IQR: 45-130 vs 90, IQR: 60-120; P = .33) between the intervention and control group. Adjusting for baseline BMI, there was a reduction in the number of weekday meals in front of the television (1.6 6 1.0 vs 1.9 6 1.2; P = .03) but no differences in BMI or number of televisions in the bedroom.CONCLUSIONS: This pragmatic trial was not effective in reducing screen time or BMI but was effective in reducing meals in front of the screen. Short interventions focused solely on reducing screen time implemented in the primary care practice setting may not be effective in this age group.

Objective: To identify child and parental factors associated with screen time in 3-year-old children. Design: Observational study. Setting: Participants were recruited from a large primary-care paediatric group practice in Toronto, Canada. Subjects: Healthy 3-year-old children were included. A questionnaire was completed by their parents on screen time. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used to assess associations between child screen time and selected factors. Multivariable models included factors from the univariate analysis with P , 0?1. Estimated effects and 95 % CI are reported. Results: A total of 157 children were enrolled (91 % recruitment). The mean screen time per weekday was 104 min (similar for weekend day). In all, 10 % of children had a television (TV) in their bedroom; 59 % consumed at least one meal while watching TV; and 81 % of parents had household rules about screen time. Controlling for maternal education and age, eating lunch and dinner in front of the screen and mother being employed were associated with an increase in child weekday screen time of 96 (95 % CI 30, 192), 42 (95 % CI 12, 90) and 36 (95 % CI 6, 72) min/d, respectively. Eating lunch in front of the screen and an increase of 1 h of parental screen time were associated with an increase of 78 (95 % CI 36, 132) and 12 (95 % CI 6, 18) min/d in child weekend screen time. Family rules decreased child weekend screen time by 30 (95 % CI 6, 54) min/d. Conclusions: Interventions that include these important parental factors should be evaluated for their effectiveness in reducing screen time.

2510 Background: Anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy is a breakthrough treatment (tx) for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Despite impressive outcomes, non-response and relapse with CD19 negative disease remain challenges. Through dual B-cell antigen targeting of CD20 and CD19, with a first-in-human bispecific lentiviral CAR-T cell (LV20.19CAR), we aim to improve response rates while limiting CD19 negative relapse. Methods: Pts were treated on a Phase 1 dose escalation + expansion trial (NCT03019055) to demonstrate safety of a 41BB/CD3z LV20.19CAR T cell for adults with R/R B-cell NHL. Safety was assessed by incidence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) within 28 days post-infusion. Starting dose was 2.5 x 10^5 cells/kg with a target dose of 2.5 x 10^6 cells/kg. All pts received fludarabine+cyclophosphamide for lymphodepletion. Results: 11 pts have completed tx to date. 9 pts in dose escalation and 2 pts in expansion phase. Median age was 54 years (46-67) and histology included DLBCL = 5 pts, MCL = 4 pts, and CLL = 2 pts. In dose escalation, 3 pts were treated at 2.5 x 10^5 cells/kg, 3 pts at 7.5 x 10^5 cells/kg, and 3 pts at 2.5 x 10^6 cells/kg with no DLTs. As a result, 2.5 x 10^6 cells/kg was selected for expansion. In terms of safety, 6 pts developed Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and 3 pts had Grade 1-2 neurotoxicity (NTX). No patient had grade 3-4 CRS or NTX and none required ICU level care. 4 pts required 1-2 doses of tocilizumab for CRS. The day 28 overall response rate (ORR) for all pts was 82% (6/11 = complete response (CR) and 3/11 = partial response). All CR pts remain in remission, the longest > 1 year. All progressing pts underwent repeat biopsy, and all retained either CD19 or CD20 positivity. Additional pts are being enrolled in the expansion phase and updated data will be presented. Conclusions: Phase 1 results from the LV20.19 CAR T clinical trial demonstrate that infusion of 2.5 x 10^6 cells/kg is safe for further investigation with no DLTs among treated pts. Down-regulation of target antigens was not identified as a mechanism of resistance in progressing pts. With limited toxicity and encouraging ORR, dual targeted LV20.19CAR T cells merits further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT03019055.

This simple intervention administered during a health maintenance visit did not result in a decrease in iron depletion at 2 years of age but did result in a 60% reduction in prolonged bottle use.

No abstract

Daily cow's milk intake of >2 cups, longer breast-feeding duration, and a higher body mass index z score were modifiable risk factors associated with iron deficiency. Eating meat according to recommendations may be a promising additional target for the prevention of iron deficiency in early childhood.

No abstract

Background: CAR-T cell therapy directed against the CD19 antigen is a breakthrough treatment for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell NHL. Despite impressive outcomes, not all pts respond and many that respond still relapse. Affordability and accessibility are further considerations that limit current commercial models of CAR-T products. Commercial CAR-T manufacturing is complex, time consuming, and expensive with a supply chain starting at the treating center with apheresis of mononuclear cells, cryopreservation, and shipping to and from a centralized third-party manufacturing site. We addressed these limitations in a Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating a first-in-human bispecific tandem CAR-T cell directed against both CD19 and CD20 (CAR-20.19-T) antigens for pts with R/R B-cell NHL. Through dual targeting we hope to improve response rates and durability of response while limiting antigen escape. We eliminated third party shipping logistics utilizing the CliniMACS Prodigy, a compact tabletop device that allows for automated manufacturing of CAR-T cells within a GMP compliant environment within the hospital. Most materials and reagents used to produce the CAR-T cell product were single-sourced from the device manufacturer. Methods: Phase 1 (NCT03019055), single center, dose escalation + expansion study to demonstrate feasibility and safety of locally manufactured second generation 41BB + CD3z CAR-20.19-T cells via the CliniMACS Prodigy. Feasibility was measured by ability to generate a target CAR-20.19-T cell dose for a minimum of 75% of subjects. Safety was assessed by the presence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) through 28 days post-infusion. Dose was escalated in a 3+3 fashion with a starting dose of 2.5 x 10^5 cells/kg, a target DLT rate <33%, and a goal treatment dose of 2.5 x 10^6 cells/kg. Adults with R/R Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Follicular Lymphoma (FL), Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) were eligible. CAR-T production was set for a 14-day manufacturing process. Day 8 in-process testing was performed to ensure quality and suitability of CAR-T cells for a potential fresh infusion. On Day 10, pts eligible for a fresh CAR-T infusion initiated lymphodepletion (LDP) chemotherapy with fludarabine 30 mg/m2 x 3 days and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 x 1 day, and cells were administered after harvest on Day 14. Pts ineligible for fresh infusion received cryopreserved product and LDP was delayed accordingly. Results: 6 pts have been enrolled and treated with CAR-20.19-T cells: 3 pts at 2.5 x 10^5 cells/kg and 3 pts at 7.5 x 10^5 cells/kg. Median age was 53 years (48-62). Underlying disease was MCL in 3 pts, DLBCL in 2 pts, and CLL in 1 patient. Baseline data and prior treatments are listed in Table 1. CAR-T production was successful in all runs and all pts received their target dose. Three pts received fresh CAR-T cells and 3 pts received CAR-T cells after cryopreservation. To date there are no DLTs to report. No cases of Grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurotoxicity (NTX) were observed. One patient had Grade 2 CRS and Grade 2 NTX requiring intervention. The other had self-limited Grade 1 CRS and Grade 1 NTX. Median time to development of CRS was Day +11 post-infusion. All pts had neutrophil recovery (ANC>0.5 K/µL) by Day 28. Response at Day 28 (Table 2) is as follows: 2/6 pts achieved a complete response (CR), 2/6 achieved a partial response (PR), and 2/6 had progressive disease (PD). One subject with a PR subsequently progressed at Day 90. The 3 pts who did progress all underwent a repeat biopsy, and all retained either CD19 or CD20 positivity. Pts are currently being enrolled at the target dose (2.5 x 10^6 cells/kg) and updated results will be provided at ASH. Conclusions: Dual targeted anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 CAR-T cells were successfully produced for all pts demonstrating the feasibility of a point-of-care manufacturing process via the CliniMACS Prodigy device. With no DLTs or Grade 3-4 CRS or NTX to report, and 2/6 heavily pre-treated pts remaining in CR at 3 and 9 months respectively our approach represents a feasible and promising alternative to existing CAR-T models and costs. Down-regulation of both target antigens was not identified in any patient following CAR-T infusion, and in-process studies suggest that a shorter manufacturing timeline is appropriate for future trials (10 days). Disclosures Shah: Juno Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Lentigen Technology: Research Funding; Oncosec: Equity Ownership; Miltenyi: Other: Travel funding, Research Funding; Geron: Equity Ownership; Exelexis: Equity Ownership. Zhu:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Research Funding. Schneider:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Krueger:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Worden:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Hamadani:Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; MedImmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellerant: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Ostuka: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Johnson:Miltenyi: Research Funding. Dropulic:Lentigen, A Miltenyi Biotec company: Employment. Orentas:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Other: Prior Employment. Hari:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding.