Many dialysis centers depend on clinical laboratories or a commercially available dip culture to determine the contamination levels in water and dialysate. To determine whether these standard clinical culture procedures adequately quantitate bacterial contamination in hemodialysis center water and dialysate, test results of two routine clinical media was compared, trypticase soy agar (TSA) and plate count agar (PCA), with those of nutrient-poor R2A medium. Dialysate samples demonstrated significant differences in media, the temperature of incubation, and plating techniques (pour plate versus spread plates). Purified water for dialysis demonstrated significant differences only for media; however, temperature was an important variable. Selective growth on R2A agar of some water- and dialysate-contaminating species was studied by velvet disk and loop transfer of colonies. A strong selectivity for water-borne bacteria was demonstrated by R2A agar; the bacteria that did not grow on TSA and PCA have been identified.
The purified water supplies and randomly selected dialysates of 51 chronic and acute dialysis centers in the central United States were surveyed to assess the relative risks to dialysis patients from microbial and endotoxin contamination. A culture medium more sensitive than those generally employed in routine quality assurance assays was used for recovery of bacteria from water. With this medium, 35.3% of the water samples and 19% of the dialysate samples were out of compliance with the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standards: 200 and 2,000 colony forming units (CFU)/ml, respectively. There was no correlation observed between the type of water purification system or the frequency of disinfection of the system and the bacterial and endotoxin contamination levels. There was also no correlation found between the bacterial and fungal CFU per ml and the endotoxin concentration per ml (EU/ ml). It is recommended that more sensitive culturing methods be used to provide adequate bacterial monitoring of dialysate center water supplies. Dialysis centers should monitor endotoxin in dialysate on a regular schedule and immediately after any endotoxemic‐like patient reactions. Yeast and fungi were observed in 10% and 64% of the water systems, respectively. Dialysate was contaminated by yeast and fungi in 30% and 70% of the centers, respectively. The concentrations of these microbes in both fluids were much lower than bacteria. However, they were observed often enough to warrant further investigation of their impact on the well‐being of dialysis patients.
The bacterial and endotoxin levels of purified water and effluent dialysate were examined in a cross section of dialysis centers in the central United States. All samples were collected within a four-hour drive of the University of Louisville and were collected, processed and analyzed by our personnel, to eliminate variability in sample handling. A medium capable of higher bacteria recovery from aqueous environments than those ordinarily employed in clinical assays was used. Endotoxins were determined by a quantitative colorimetric assay. By the more sensitive bacterial assay 53% of the centers had bacterial counts above the AAMI standard of 200 colony-forming units per ml (CFU/ml) for water and 35% of the centers had bacterial counts above the 2000 CFU/ml standard for dialysate in at least one sampling period. The samples showed 35% and 19% of water and dialysate above the standards, respectively. While there are no standards for endotoxin concentrations in water used to prepare dialysate, 2% of the centers had endotoxin levels in their water above five endotoxin units per ml (5 EU/ml = 1 ng/ml in our assay kit), the limit set by the AAMI standards for reprocessor water. Both bacterial and endotoxin levels tended to be elevated in dialysate, with the highest levels of endotoxin in dialysates posing an obvious potential risk when high-flux dialyzers are used.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.