In April 1970, the BioSciences Information Service of Biological Abstracts, the Chemical Abstracts Service, and Engineering Index, Inc. began a five-part study to determine the relationships between and the overlap in coverage in their printed publications and computerreadable services. This study was designed to provide information needed by these three accessing services for planning future cooperative programs and for reconciling differences in policies and practices so as to make their publications and services more useful toIn April 1970, the BioSciences iformation Service of Biological Abstracts (BIOSIS) , the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), and Engineering Index, Inc. (Ei) announced a joint five-part study with the following objectives: .To determine the amount of overlap among the lists of primary journals each of the services regularly monitors. 2.To find out how the same journal articles are selected for analysis by more than one of the three services. 3. To study differences in the editorial policies and procedures employed by the three services as they relate to the form, the format, and the content of bibliographic descriptions and abstracts.
The symposium papers which follow are an outgrowth of a previous paper1 by the author in which the duplication of efforts in the area of physicochemical property data handling was pointed out, and the need for cooperative efforts was stressed.The need for cooperative efforts is even more strongly indicated by some recent work by the author and Steven Hildrich (unpublished work) in which a random sample of 145 abstracts of journal articles in Chemical Abstracts was checked for duplicate processing in several other abstracting and indexing services. Preliminary results indicate that the intellectual effort of processing these articles is repeated for better than half the cases by another abstracting and indexing service. Extrapolating these preliminary results to the total volume of publication in Chemical Abstracts, and using conservative figures for costs and time spent in quality abstracting alone leads to a total expenditure in duplicate costs of roughly two million dollars annually, and in duplicate time of 75 man-years annually.Considering the present climate of economic belt-tightening and the lack of good information personnel, such duplication of effort is unforgivable. The papers that follow were chosen to be representative of the present laudable efforts to eliminate some of the processing duplication in various areas of chemistry by cooperation, or to detail how cooperative effort has led to a more useable product. These examples of cooperation in the areas of abstracting and indexing (the first paper by C. M. Flanagan), information storage and retrieval systems (the next three papers by S. J. Martinez, S. A. Rossmassler, and P.Urbach, respectively), and structural data handling (the last two papers by C. E. Granito and W. J. Wiswesser et al.) are encouraging developments in working toward the ultimate goal of the most efficient processing of information to make maximum use of money and talent available to the information community.LITERATURE CITED announced a joint five-part study w i t h the following objectives: t o determine the amount of overlap among the lists of primary journals each of the services regularly monitors, t o find out h o w the same journal articles are selected for analysis, t o study differences i n the editorial policies and procedures employed by the three services, t o measure the degree of compatability or interconvertibility of the computer-readable files of each of the services, and to determine the similarities and differences of indexing policies. This paper reports the findings of the first t w o parts of this study.
Of 14, 592 primary journals being collectively monitored by the BioSciences Information Service of Biological Abstracts (BIOSIS), the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), and Engineering Index, Inc. (Ei) on 1 May 1970, only 4081 were being monitored by two or more of the services. The extent to which all three or any two of these services select the same journal article for coverage was determined by examining each service's selection records for the July 1969–June 1970 issues of these 4081 overlap journals. The maximum possible journal article overlap among BIOSIS, CAS and Ei was found to be 822 articles and between BIOSIS and Ei, 1428 articles. The journal article overlap between BIOSIS and CAS was found to be 48, 856 articles and between CAS and Ei, 21, 583 articles.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.