Proliferation markers, such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), Ki-67, and thymidine kinase 1 (TK1), have potential as diagnostic tools and as prognostic factors in assessing cancer treatment and disease progression. TK1 is involved in cellular proliferation through the recovery of the nucleotide thymidine in the DNA salvage pathway. TK1 upregulation has been found to be an early event in cancer development. In addition, serum levels of TK1 have been shown to be tied to cancer stage, so that higher levels of TK1 indicate a more serious prognosis. As a result of these findings and others, TK1 is not only a potentially viable biomarker for cancer recurrence, treatment monitoring, and survival, but is potentially more advantageous than current biomarkers. Compared to other proliferation markers, TK1 levels during S phase more accurately determine the rate of DNA synthesis in actively dividing tumors. Several reviews of TK1 elaborate on various assays that have been developed to measure levels in the serum of cancer patients in clinical settings. In this review, we include a brief history of important TK1 discoveries and findings, a comprehensive overview of TK1 regulation at DNA to protein levels, and recent findings that indicate TK1’s potential role in cancer pathogenesis and its growing potential as a tumor biomarker and therapeutic target.
Data independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry methods provide systematic and comprehensive quantification of the proteome; yet, relatively few open-source tools are available to analyze DIA proteomics experiments. Fewer still are tools that can leverage gas phase fractionated (GPF) chromatogram libraries to enhance the detection and quantification of peptides in these experiments. Here, we present nf-encyclopedia, an open-source NextFlow pipeline that connects three open-source tools—MSConvert, EncyclopeDIA, and MSstats—to analyze DIA proteomics experiments with or without chromatogram libraries. We demonstrate that nf-encyclopedia is reproducible both when run on a cloud platform or a local workstation and provides robust peptide and protein quantification. Additionally, we found that MSstats enhances protein-level quantitative performance over EncyclopeDIA alone. Finally, we benchmarked the ability nf-encyclopedia to scale to large experiments in the cloud by leveraging the parallelization of compute resources. The nf-encyclopedia pipeline is available under a permissive Apache 2.0 license—run it on your desktop, cluster, or in the cloud: https://github.com/TalusBio/nf-encyclopedia.
Data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry methods provide systematic and comprehensive quantification of the proteome; yet, relatively few open-source tools are available to analyze DIA proteomics experiments. Fewer still are tools that can leverage gas phase fractionated (GPF) chromatogram libraries to enhance the detection and quantification of peptides in these experiments. Here, we present nf-encyclopedia, an open-source NextFlow pipeline that connects three open-source tools, MSConvert, EncyclopeDIA, and MSstats, to analyze DIA proteomics experiments with or without chromatogram libraries. We demonstrate that nf-encyclopedia is reproducible when run on either a cloud platform or a local workstation and provides robust peptide and protein quantification. Additionally, we found that MSstats enhances protein-level quantitative performance over EncyclopeDIA alone. Finally, we benchmarked the ability of nf-encyclopedia to scale to large experiments in the cloud by leveraging the parallelization of compute resources. The nf-encyclopedia pipeline is available under a permissive Apache 2.0 license; run it on your desktop, cluster, or in the cloud: .
Proteomics analyses can be adapted to samples as small as a single cell, however such sample reduction severely limits the number proteins identified and quantified. Multiple software pipelines exist for processing the raw data to quantitative protein tables. For very small sample amounts, the sensitivity of software algorithms can have a significant impact on the final results. We collected whole blood samples for two subjects by venous blood draws. Using antibody guided flow cytometry cell sorting, we separated B and T cell lymphocytes. For two subjects and two different blood collections, five replicates of 145 B cells or T cells were prepared for mass spectrometry for proteomics using the AutoPOTS workflow. Using the raw files from these forty runs, we perform protein quantification with a selection of common tools such as MaxQuant, ProteomeDiscoverer, and FragPipe and compare the number of identified and quantified proteins. In small sample proteomics, the primary objective is obtaining the most quantified proteins. Although each tool has advantages in terms of usability, speed, and sensitivity, our primary concern is sensitivity. At such a low sample input, we observe that the number of quantified proteins increases by 30% using the most sensitive algorithm. For identifying and quantifying proteins from small samples, the sensitivity of the software is the most important factor to consider. In addition to the identification sensitivity of each algorithm, we are exploring optimal parameters for increased protein quantification. Differences between samples appear regardless of the processing tool, showing that using a less sensitive tool will still characterize the trends but with a significant cost to the number of proteins. Using the most sensitive algorithm for small sample proteomics will greatly improve the number of proteins identified and quantified. Citation Format: Michaela A. McCown, Carolyn Allen, Daniel D. Machado, Samuel H. Payne. Comparison of proteomics identification pipelines for lymphocyte characterization [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 274.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.