This article reports findings arising from a systematic review of literature relating to mentoring new head teachers. The review found that all major studies of formal mentoring programmes for new heads reported that such programmes have been effective, and that the mentoring of new heads can result in a range of perceived benefits for both mentees and mentors. However, the nature of the research evidence presented to support such findings is inconclusive and there are notable gaps in the evidence base. With a view to advancing academic knowledge in the field, the authors highlight those areas where further research is most needed.
This research collected information from English and Welsh local education authorities (LEAs) on primary/first school entry policy; and the academic achievements of children in relation to their 'season of birth'. The findings indicate that LEAs are adopting a range of policies, the most common of which are annual (44 per cent), termly (25 per cent) and biannual (23 per cent) patterns of entry. Most schools take four-year-olds, and just under a third of LEAs have changed their policy recently, all in favour of admitting younger fours. The main reason given for changes in entry policy is to address the needs of 'summer-born' children, who are thought to be disadvantaged by spending less time in school than their older classmates. Data from key stage 1 (KS1) and General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) assessments confirm that children who are older in the year-group perform best (although there are some anomalies evident in the month on month trends). It is argued that these findings are due to the differences in age when taking the tests, but may also be influenced by 'age-position effects' and entry policies. A number of strategies are outlined, aimed at reducing the disadvantages suffered by children who are the youngest in the year-group.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.