As a result of our efforts to discover novel p53:MDM2 protein-protein interaction inhibitors useful for treating cancer, the potent and selective MDM2 inhibitor NVP-CGM097 (1) with an excellent in vivo profile was selected as a clinical candidate and is currently in phase 1 clinical development. This article provides an overview of the discovery of this new clinical p53:MDM2 inhibitor. The following aspects are addressed: mechanism of action, scientific rationale, binding mode, medicinal chemistry, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and in vivo pharmacology/toxicology in preclinical species.
Biomarkers for patient selection are essential for the successful and rapid development of emerging targeted anti-cancer therapeutics. In this study, we report the discovery of a novel patient selection strategy for the p53–HDM2 inhibitor NVP-CGM097, currently under evaluation in clinical trials. By intersecting high-throughput cell line sensitivity data with genomic data, we have identified a gene expression signature consisting of 13 up-regulated genes that predicts for sensitivity to NVP-CGM097 in both cell lines and in patient-derived tumor xenograft models. Interestingly, these 13 genes are known p53 downstream target genes, suggesting that the identified gene signature reflects the presence of at least a partially activated p53 pathway in NVP-CGM097-sensitive tumors. Together, our findings provide evidence for the use of this newly identified predictive gene signature to refine the selection of patients with wild-type p53 tumors and increase the likelihood of response to treatment with p53–HDM2 inhibitors, such as NVP-CGM097.DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06498.001
OBJECTIVE: To study the interactions of colistin (MIC 2 mg/L) at concentrations of 0.5 and 5 mg/L with ceftazidime (1 and 75 mg/L, MIC 0.5 mg/L), aztreonam (1 and 30 mg/L, MIC 0.12 mg/L), meropenem (1 and 25 mg/L, MIC 0.03 mg/L), gentamicin (1 and 10 mg/L, MIC 2 mg/L), piperacillin (5 and 100 mg/L, MIC 4 mg/L) and ciprofloxacin (0.25 and 4 mg/L, MIC 1 mg/L) using a representative strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from a cystic fibrosis patient. METHODS: The method used was a bacterial time kill curve with single agents and combinations. Using inocula of 106 CFU/mL, multiple sampling was performed over 6 h and in triplicate. The AUBKC of the time versus viable count curve, with single agents and combinations of agents, was taken as the endpoint for comparison. RESULTS: For colistin plus ceftazidime, colistin plus aztreonam, colistin plus meropenem and colistin plus ciprofloxacin, the pattern was for all the combinations (high or low concentrations) to produce smaller AUBKCs than single agents. In experiments using a bacteriostatic agent such as ceftazidime, the AUBKCs (log CFU/µL per h) for colistin 0.5 mg/L or 5 mg/L alone were 32.3±0.8 or 12.7±0.5, and for ceftazidime 1 mg/L or 75 mg/L alone they were 24.3±1.5 or 20.9±2.7. Combinations of colistin 0.5 mg/L plus either ceftazidime 1 mg/L or 75 mg/L produced AUBKCs of 23.8±1.8 or 16.1 mg/L. Combinations of colistin 5 mg/L plus ceftazidime 1 mg/L or 75 mg/L produced AUBKCs of 12.2±0.8 or 8.7±1.0. The AUBKCs for colistin 5 mg/L plus 75 mg/L are significantly smaller than those for the single agents, indicating synergy. In experiments using the bactericidal agent ciprofloxacin, the AUBKCs (log CFU/mL per h) for colistin 0.5 mg/L or 5 mg/L alone were 33.6±1.9 or 11.2±2.4, and for ciprofloxacin 0.25 mg/L or 4 mg/L alone they were 32.8±1.3 or 5.0±0.7. Combinations of colistin 0.5 mg/L plus either ciprofloxacin 0.25 mg/L or 4 mg/L produced AUBKCs of 32.2±0.9 or 4.3±1.4. Combinations of colistin 5 mg/L plus ciprofloxacin 0.25 mg/L or 4 mg/L produced AUBKCs of 10.7±1.5 or 4.2±0.6. Although combination AUBKCs were smaller than those for single agents, in no case did this reach statistical significance (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These studies indicate that addition of colistin to other antipseudomonal drugs tends to produce smaller AUBKCs and hence greater killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa than monotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.