A B S T R AC TContact plans for children in adoption and long-term foster care are decided on a case-by-case basis, as directed by the paramountcy principle in the Children Act (1989). The idea that birth family contact helps children resolve issues around attachment, separation and loss, and identity is prevalent in social work practice. However, evidence revealing the detrimental impact of contact has been used to support increasingly restrictive legislation. The current review aims to provide policy-makers and social workers with a resource to guide decisions in permanency planning by evaluating this evidence and reported outcomes for children. The research question and exclusion/inclusion criteria were formulated and used to develop a search strategy. Of the 412 potential titles returned, 11 were of sufficient quality to include in the thematic synthesis. Results were mixed and significantly influenced by moderator variables such as the pre-existing relationship between children and their birth families. Outcomes were particularly positive when there was a collaborative approach between birth families and adoptive parents or foster carers. Outcomes tended to be poorest for children who had ongoing contact with maltreating birth parents. The review findings support current policy and previous research in recommending a more reflexive approach to assessing and planning contact.
Surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is often indicated to restore functional stability and prevent early degeneration of the knee joint, as there is little biological healing capacity of the native ACL. Although a reconstructed ACL does not fully restore the original structure or biomechanics properties of the native ACL, the graft used for reconstruction must not only have structural and mechanical properties that closely resemble those of the native ligament, it must also have minimal antigenicity and enough biological potential to incorporate into host bone. There are several considerations in graft selection: autograft versus allograft, and soft tissue grafts versus grafts with bone plugs. Commonly used grafts include bone-patella tendon-bone, hamstring, and quadriceps; among allografts, options further include tibias anterior and posterior, Achilles, an peroneal tendons. Optimal graft selection is not only dependent on graft properties, but perhaps more importantly on patient characteristics and expectations. The purpose of this review is to summarize the relevant biological, biomechancial, and clinical data regarding various graft types and to provide a basic framework for graft selection in ACL reconstruction.
Background: An intra-articular infection after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is a rare complication but one with potentially devastating consequences. The rare nature of this complication raises difficulties in detecting risk factors associated with it and with worse outcomes after one has occurred. Purpose: To (1) evaluate the association between an infection after ACLR and potential risk factors in a large single-center cohort of patients who had undergone ACLR and (2) assess the factors associated with ACL graft retention versus removal. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All ACLR procedures performed at our institution between January 2010 and December 2018 were reviewed; a total of 11,451 procedures were identified. A retrospective medical record review was performed to determine the incidence of infections, patient and procedure characteristics associated with an infection, infection characteristics, incidence of ACL graft retention, and factors associated with the retention versus removal of an ACL graft. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential risk factors for an infection after ACLR. Results: Of the 11,451 ACLR procedures, 48 infections were identified (0.42%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed revision ACLR (odds ratio [OR], 3.13 [95% CI, 1.55-6.32]; P = .001) and younger age (OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02-1.10]; P = .001) as risk factors for an infection. Compared with bone–patellar tendon–bone autografts, both hamstring tendon autografts (OR, 4.39 [95% CI, 2.15-8.96]; P < .001) and allografts (OR, 5.27 [95% CI, 1.81-15.35]; P = .002) were independently associated with an increased risk of infections. Overall, 15 ACL grafts were removed (31.3%). No statistically significant differences besides the number of irrigation and debridement procedures were found for retained versus removed grafts, although some trends were identified ( P = .054). Conclusion: In a large single-center cohort of patients who had undergone ACLR and those with an infection after ACLR, patients with revision cases and younger patients were found to have a higher incidence of infection. The use of bone–patellar tendon–bone autografts was found to be associated with the lowest risk of infection after ACLR compared with both hamstring tendon autografts and allografts. Larger cohorts with a larger number of infection cases are needed to determine the factors associated with graft retention versus removal.
Background: Kaplan fibers are distinct deep layers of the distal iliotibial band (ITB) that anchor the ITB to the distal femur and have a role in rotational stability of the knee. However, the incidence of Kaplan fiber injury in the setting of acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is unknown. Purpose: To determine the reliability of identifying and evaluating Kaplan fibers on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations based on previously reported characteristics and to report on the incidence of combined ACL and Kaplan fiber injuries based on MRI examinations. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with an acute primary ACL tear who obtained a postinjury MRI scan at our institution and were treated with ACL reconstruction between January 1, 2007, and May 31, 2012, were identified from an institutional registry. Each patient’s postinjury MRI scan was reviewed by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists, who identified Kaplan fibers and graded them as intact, injured, or not visualized. Intrarater reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and interrater reliability was measured using the kappa statistic. Results: A total of 72 patients were identified. For the proximal Kaplan fibers, 50% versus 58% were identified as injured, 32% versus 29% were identified as intact, and 18% versus 13% were not visualized by radiologist 1 and 2, respectively. For the distal Kaplan fibers, 46% versus 60% were identified as injured, 43% versus 28% were identified as intact, and 11% versus 12% were not visualized by radiologist 1 and 2, respectively. The ICC intrarater reliability measurements were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.93) for proximal Kaplan fibers and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.51-0.78) for distal Kaplan fibers. The interrater reliability measurements for both radiologists showed substantial agreement (kappa = 0.7) for proximal Kaplan fibers and moderate agreement (kappa = 0.51) for distal Kaplan fibers. Conclusion: Kaplan fibers were visualized on MRI studies in the majority of cases, with substantial reliability for the proximal fibers and moderate reliability for the distal fibers. There was an associated injury to either the proximal or distal or both Kaplan fibers in the majority of acute primary ACL tears.
Although the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injuries continues to rise, return to sport (RTS) rates remain low and risk of the second injury remains high. No gold-standard criteria exist for medical clearance to RTS after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The lack of consensus may be driven by the multifactorial nature of the clinical decision that includes a combination of physical and psychological factors. Tools such as the Quality of Movement Assessment, which identifies physical deficits and faulty movement patterns to provide targeted recommendations for safe RTS, and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale, which determines psychological readiness by measuring an athlete’s emotions, confidence, and risk appraisal, have been developed in recent years. This review summarizes the existing evidence regarding RTS and highlights the need for a comprehensive evaluation of an athlete’s readiness to return.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.