Objective: To compare mortality and the principal intercurrent clinical conditions suffered by late-preterm newborn infants born with gestational ages of 34 full weeks to 36 weeks and 6 days, and full term newborns.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of all preterm newborn infants born at a public hospital from August 2010 to August 2011. The study sample comprised late-preterm infants (cases) and a group of full term newborns (controls). Three controls were enrolled for each case. Maternal, gestational and neonatal variables were analyzed. Means and standard deviations were used to compare numerical variables between case and control groups using Student's t test and the Mann-Whitney test; Pearson's chi-square was used for categorical variables. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to estimate risk. Results:The study sample comprised 239 late-preterm infants and 698 full term newborns. Mothers aged over 35 years and/or with a history of previous premature deliveries had a higher proportion of late-preterm children. The following gestational variables were associated with late-preterm delivery: hypertension, infectious diseases, rupture of membranes more than 18 hours previously and multiple pregnancies. When compared with full term newborns, late-preterms were statistically more likely to be subject to hypothermia/hyperthermia, hypoglycemia, respiratory pathologies, resuscitation in the delivery room, phototherapy, supplementary feeding, mechanical ventilation, venous infusions, antibiotics and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, resulting in a nine times greater neonatal mortality rate. Intercurrent conditions were inversely related to gestational age. Conclusions:Late-preterm newborn infants had a mortality rate nine times that of full term infants and were exposed to a greater risk of intercurrent conditions during the neonatal period. These intercurrent conditions were inversely related to gestational age.J Pediatr (Rio J). 2012;88(3):259-66: Newborn, infant, premature, preterm, complications. ResumoObjetivo: Comparar as taxas de óbito e as principais intercorrências clínicas entre recém-nascidos pré-termo tardios nascidos com idade gestacional entre 34 semanas completas e 36 semanas e 6 dias e recém-nascidos a termo. Métodos:Estudo transversal envolvendo todos os recém-nascidos pré-termo tardios nascidos entre agosto de 2010 e agosto de 2011. A população do estudo foi constituída pelos recém-nascidos pré-termo tardios (casos) e um grupo de recém-nascidos a termo (controles), sendo selecionados três controles para cada caso. Foram analisadas variáveis maternas, da gestação e neonatais. Na análise estatística, utilizaram-se médias, desvios padrão e testes t de Student e de MannWhitney para variáveis numéricas, o qui-quadrado de Pearson para variáveis categóricas e estimativa de risco pela odds ratio com intervalo de confiança de 95%. Resultados:A população do estudo foi constituída por 239 recém-nascidos pré-termo tardios e 698 recém-nascidos a termo. As gest...

Object Trauma is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in children, young people, and working-age adults. Because of the high incidence of intentional and unintentional injuries in young people, it is necessary to implement injury-prevention programs and measure the efficacy of these initiatives. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of an injury-prevention program in high school students in a city in southern Brazil. Methods In a randomized controlled study, 1049 high school students were divided into a control group and intervention group. The study was conducted in the following 3 stages: a questionnaire was applied 1 week before the educational intervention (P0), shortly after the intervention (P1), and 5 months later (P3). In the control group, a questionnaire based on the Pense Bem Project was applied at the 3 time stages, without any intervention between the stages. Results The postintervention analysis evidenced a slight change in knowledge about unintentional spinal cord and brain injuries. Regarding attitudes, the only significant improvement after the intervention lecture was in the use of helmets, which remained high 5 months later. A substantial number of students only partially agreed with using safety behaviors. The only significant postintervention change was the major agreement to check swimming pool depth before entering the water (P0 89% and P1 97.8%, p < 0.001; P2 92.8%, p = 0.005). Conclusions An educational intervention based on a single lecture improved students' knowledge of traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries, but this type of intervention did not modify most attitudes toward injury prevention. Clinical trial registration no.: U1111-1121-0192.

No abstract

Object A previous study published by the authors showed that a single intervention could not change the baseline attitudes toward neurotrauma prevention. The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of multiple interventions in modifying knowledge and attitudes for the prevention of neurotrauma in Brazilian preteens and adolescents. Methods In a randomized controlled trial, fifth-year primary school (PS) and second-year high school (HS) students were divided into a control and 2 intervention (single/multiple) groups. The study was conducted in the following 8 stages: T1, questionnaire to measure baseline characteristics; T2, lecture on trauma prevention; T3, reapplying the questionnaire used in T1; T4, Traffic Department intervention; T5, a play about trauma and its consequences; T6, Fire Department intervention; T7, Emergency Medical Service intervention; and T8, reapplying the questionnaire used in T1 and T3. Positive answers were considered those affirming the use of safety devices “always or sometimes” and negative as “never” using safety devices. Results The sample consisted of 535 students. Regarding attitudes, students in all groups at any stage of measurement showed protective behavior more than 95% of the time about seat belt use. There were only differences between attitudes in PS and HS students on T8 assessment concerning the use of safety equipment on bikes in the multiple-intervention group and concerning the use of safety equipment on skateboards and rollerblades in single- and multiple-intervention groups. These differences were caused mainly by the reduction in positive answers by the HS group, rather than by the increase in positive or protective answers by the PS group. However, there was no difference when the control and intervention groups were compared, independent of the attitudes or the student groups studied. The most important reason for not using protective devices was the belief that they would not get hurt. Conclusions Multiple and different types of educational interventions, such as lectures, scenes from plays about trauma and its consequences, traffic and fire department intervention, and medical emergency intervention directed to preteens and adolescents from public and private schools did not modify most students' attitudes toward injury prevention. Clinical trial registration no: U1111–1121–0192 (National System of Ethics and Research in Brazil).

Objective: Evaluate the predictive value of the Lasègue sign on self-reported quality of life measures (HRQoL) in patients who undergo microdiscectomy. Methods: 95 patients with clinical and radiological diagnosis of LDH who underwent microdiscectomy were included. The patients were assessed by a neurological examination and answered validated instruments to assess pain, disability, quality of life, and mood disorder in the preoperative period, and 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results: Preoperative Lasègue sign was identified in 56.8% (n=54/95) of the cases. There was no difference between the groups in the preoperative period regarding HRQoL. At one year follow-up no statistically significant difference in HRQoL was observed in the Lasègue group. The discrimination capacity of the preoperative Lasègue sign to determinate variations in HRQoL outcomes one year postoperatively was low. Conclusion: Lasègue sign is not a good predictor of outcome after microdiscectomy for LDH.Keywords: Intervertebral disc displacement; Quality of life; Prognosis; Spine/surgery. RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o valor preditivo do Sinal de Lasègue em medidas de qualidade de vida (HRQoL) em pacientes submetidos a microdiscectomia. Métodos: 95 pacientes com diagnóstico clínico e radiológico de HDL submetidos à microdiscectomia foram incluídos. Os pacientes foram avaliados por exame neurológico e responderam instrumentos validados para medir dor, incapacidade, qualidade de vida e transtornos do humor no período pré-operatório e 1, 6 e 12 meses após a cirurgia. Resultados: O sinal de Lasègue no pré-operatório foi identificado em 56,8% (n = 54/95) dos casos. Não houve diferença entre os grupos no pré-operatório em relação à HRQoL. Em um ano de pós-operatório não foi observada diferença estatística com relação à HRQoL no grupo com Lasègue. A capacidade de discriminação do Sinal de Lasègue pré-operatório para determinar variações na

Introduction A previous study published by the authors showed that a single intervention could not change the base line attitudes toward neurotrauma prevention. The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of multiple interventions in modifying knowledge and attitudes for the prevention of neurotrauma in Brazilian preteens and adolescents. Materials and Methods In a randomized controlled trial, fifth-year primary school (PS) and second-year high school (HS) students were divided into a control and two intervention (single/multiple) groups. The study was conducted in the following eight stages: T1, questionnaire to measure baseline characteristics; T2, lecture on trauma prevention; T3, reapplying the questionnaire used in T1; T4, Traffic Department intervention; T5, a play about trauma and its consequences; T6, Fire Department intervention; T7, Emergency Medical Service intervention; and T8, reapplying the questionnaire used in T1 and T3. Positive answers were considered those stating that safety devices were used “always or sometimes” and negative as “never” using safety devices. Results The sample consisted of 535 students. Regarding attitudes, students in all the groups at any stage of measurement showed protective behavior more than 95% of the time about seat belt use. There were only differences between attitudes in PS and HS students on T8 assessment concerning the use of safety equipment on bikes in the multiple intervention group and concerning the use of safety equipment on skateboards and rollerblades in single- and multiple-intervention groups. These differences were caused mainly by the reduction in positive answers by the HS group, rather than by the increase in positive or protective answers by the PS group. However, there was no difference when the control and intervention groups were compared, independent of the attitudes or the student groups studied. The most important reason for not using protective devices was the belief that they would not get hurt. Conclusion Multiple and different types of educational interventions, such as lectures, scenes from plays about trauma and its consequences, traffic and fire department intervention, and medical emergency intervention directed to preteens and adolescents from public and private schools did not modify most students' attitudes toward injury prevention. Clinical trial registration no was U1111–1121–0192 (National System of Ethics and Research in Brazil).

No abstract