No abstract

Background. Cardiac troponin levels have been reported to add value in the detection of cardiovascular complications in noncardiac surgery. A sensitive cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assay could provide more accurate prognostic information. Methods. This study prospectively enrolled 142 patients with at least one Revised Cardiac Risk Index risk factor who underwent noncardiac surgery. cTnI levels were measured postoperatively. Short-term cardiac outcome predictors were evaluated. Results. cTnI elevation was observed in 47 patients, among whom 14 were diagnosed as having myocardial infarction (MI). After 30 days, 16 patients had major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Excluding patients with a final diagnosis of MI, predictors of cTnI elevation included dialysis, history of heart failure, transoperative major bleeding, and elevated levels of pre- and postoperative N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Maximal cTnI values showed the highest sensitivity (94%), specificity (75%), and overall accuracy (AUC 0.89; 95% CI 0.80–0.98) for postoperative MACE. Postoperative cTnI peak level (OR 9.4; 95% CI 2.3–39.2) and a preoperative NT-proBNP level ≥917 pg/mL (OR 3.47; 95% CI 1.05–11.6) were independent risk factors for MACE. Conclusions. cTnI was shown to be an independent prognostic factor for cardiac outcomes and should be considered as a component of perioperative risk assessment.

A large proportion of patients with hypertension need a second drug to reach satisfactory control of blood pressure (BP), but there are few well-designed controlled trials comparing the efficacy of drugs added as a second option. In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, 82 patients with uncontrolled BP, receiving hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg daily, were selected to receive amiloride 2.5-5 mg/day (n = 39) or enalapril 10-20 mg/day (n = 43). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was done before and after 12-weeks of treatment. Office BP was measured in the 4(th), 8(th), and 12(th) weeks. The doses of amiloride and enalapril were doubled in the fourth week, and propranolol was added in the 8th week if office BP was above 140/90 mm Hg. There was a greater BP reduction in patients treated with enalapril. The ABPM delta values between the groups were 3.6 +/- 2.2, 3.9 +/- 2.2, and 1.1 +/- 2.7 mmHg for 24-h, daily, and nightly systolic blood pressure, respectively, favoring enalapril. For diastolic blood pressure (DBP), the deltas were 1.7 +/- 2.0, 3.2 +/- 1.5, and 1.2 +/- 1.9 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.039 for daily DBP). Office SBP decreased more and sooner in patients allocated to enalapril (p = 0.003). More patients taking amiloride required propranolol to control BP (p = 0.035). Potassium increased 0.3 mEq/L on the average in both groups. Cough, albeit predominantly mild, was reported more frequently by participants treated with enalapril. We conclude that enalapril is more effective than amiloride to lower BP of patients on hydrochlorothiazide with uncontrolled BP.

NT-proBNP is a powerful short-term marker of perioperative cardiovascular events in high risk patients. Postoperative levels were less informative than preoperative levels. A single preoperative NT-proBNP measurement should be considered in the preoperative risk assessment.

No abstract

Treatment of patients with stage I hypertension for 18 months promotes favorable effects in the LA and LV remodeling. This improvement in cardiac end-organ damage might be associated with reduction of long term clinical consequences of hypertensive cardiomyopathy, particularly heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

High blood pressure (BP) is associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events, even in stage I hypertension (HTN) and prehypertension (preHTN). Lower left ventricular (LV) systolic function, assessed by global longitudinal strain (GLS), has been demonstrated in individuals with HTN compared to individuals with normal BP, but a comparison of individuals with preHTN and stage I HTN was not described to date. The PREVER study includes two randomized double‐blind controlled trials, performed in volunteers with preHTN (PREVER‐prevention trial) or stage I HTN (PREVER‐treatment trial), aged 30‐70 years. A subsample of patients of both trials had GLS measured from 2D echocardiograms performed at baseline and after 18 months of follow‐up. We compared baseline data from both studies and, among stage I HTN patients, clinical and echocardiographic correlates of GLS were determined. Participants with preHTN (n = 91;53% female; 55 ± 9 yo) and stage I HTN (n = 105; 44% female; 55 ± 8 yo) had similar clinical parameters beyond the expected differences in BP levels. Participants with stage I HTN had lower GLS (−17.5 ± 2.5% vs −18.2 ± 2.4%, P = .03) compared with those with preHTN. In stage I HTN, lower GLS was associated with lower e' and lower LV ejection fraction. In conclusion, patients in Stage I HTN may already express changes in GLS compared with individuals with preHTN, suggesting that even mildly difference in BP can be impact in subclinical systolic function.

No abstract